How does V walk away with no questions ever- how could he tell a woman he was getting married to have no expectations because he was committed, keep her in the same roof as his "ex" and expect his wife to be cool with it. Sai told him NOT to marry her and gave him a choice to leave..she ultimately agreed because she trusted her fathers judgement of trusting V to take care of her. She was in her most vulnerable state and yet she asked him about his marzi, asked him why he is agreeing to villagers. It was he who CHOSE to take her responsibility AND tell her that she can leave once her studies are complete. She kept talking about deal but this claiuse was introduced by Shri Shri Virat Chavan. It is mind-blowing how utterly pathetic the writers are.
I am very very disappointed that they have made out Sai to be some selfish gold figging opportunist who made a oneway profitable deal for her own good! Seriously?!
This writing is just plain CRAP!
I am extremely upset to see V present a warped version of the deal status as if Sai suggested it. Who was the one who claimed to be committed to another woman and never be able to give a place to any other person in his life. Koi ummeed mat rakhna. Yehi kaha tha. And just because he changed his mind sooner than Sai, now she's obligated to follow?!