Samrat and pulkit way to go 👍👍 - Page 4

Originally posted by: Bana

I don’t think u quite understand the issue. The issue is not whether Sai is right or wrong. Even if she was wrong, does it justify her husband locking her up in their room?

Forget justified or not, what right does he have to do that? I don’t know if u are married or not but let me point out that marriage is a union of equals & neither spouse has the right to lock up or beat or starve or evict or abuse the other. Even if the other is wrong. Our law does not allow a husband to punish his wife if she doesnt behave according to expectation - if he doesnt like her behaviour he is free to divorce her, but not to abuse her.
Thirdly, when he himself has been emotionally unfaithful, he has no business expecting anything from his wife.

Lastly, he himself has committed other immoral acts like lying to the family & covering up other people’s lies, who is he to lecture or teach his wife appropriate behaviour?

Rehne do Bana ji, kuch bhi kehna bekaar hai, aap apna time aur energy na waste karo. It's just sad at this point how people blame a victim for her abuse.

Originally posted by: Guneet80

0h yes I'm not saying neil is a bad actor, I'm just saying Neil has incredible nuance so even other actors don't seem to match upto him even in those cases where he doesn't do much but this scene, Yogi stole the show. This is probably only a few times that someone has outshone Neil.

While, I still think Yogi needs to work on his emotional scenes but I totally believe he nails the angry scenes like no other male actor in the show. I'm thoroughly impressed by him!

Oh...mine was a serious question. I was actually thinking about how an actor should enact such a scene....where he is to be remorseless about a villainous thing he did and yet technically does not happen to be the villain 😳 .

Am I making sense? 🙈

Yogi did have emotional scenes in the beginning....but he was still finding his feet....if you see even his dialogue delivery was bad initially. So hopefully his emotional scenes will be better than the initial ones.....guy seems to have potential for that.

Interesting question. I wonder how Neil does this nonsense with any conviction.

Originally posted by: Bana

Interesting question. I wonder how Neil does this nonsense with any conviction.

I think generally Neil falters when he is not convinced ....which happened during ousting track. Surprisingly he pulled off the PD lunch kaand ....he was convincingly scary.

The locking up must have been a very unconvincing scene for him...I don't know if he was trying to convey something that we didn't get...or was there something even there to convey🤔. Or he was just lacklustre. Even as he was smug he was subdued - that part was probably right...how can a guilty party stand up or face a forcefully righteous person? But other nuances.....I don't connect to his actions...so difficult to say.

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

I think generally Neil falters when he is not convinced ....which happened during ousting track. Surprisingly he pulled off the PD lunch kaand ....he was convincingly scary.

The locking up must have been a very unconvincing scene for him...I don't know if he was trying to convey something that we didn't get...or was there something even there to convey🤔. Even as he was smug he was subdued - that part was probably right...how can a guilty party stand up or face a forcefully righteous person? But other nuances.....I don't connect to his actions...so difficult to say.

Originally posted by: nethraa_99

I think generally Neil falters when he is not convinced ....which happened during ousting track. Surprisingly he pulled off the PD lunch kaand ....he was convincingly scary.

The locking up must have been a very unconvincing scene for him...I don't know if he was trying to convey something that we didn't get...or was there something even there to convey🤔. Or he was just lacklustre. Even as he was smug he was subdued - that part was probably right...how can a guilty party stand up or face a forcefully righteous person? But other nuances.....I don't connect to his actions...so difficult to say.

He stood there as if he has punished some criminal...being so proud about it.. That bothered me..Zero shame..Zero guilt...and top of that wanted to extend it even after being told how wrong he was...I personally found him off today and yesterday...he generally comes out beyond script, but sadly not in the last few episodes..

Originally posted by: Guneet80

I loved the part where Samrat asks Virat, how long has Sai been locked then screams chaabi de and Ashwini wakes up by the noise. The authority with which he spoke shut everyone up and I loved seeing that.

In fact, in the moment I felt he was the actual male lead than the trash of a husband of Sai who still held his head high in pride after locking his wife up like one would to an animal

Guys, Yogi has INCREDIBLE potential specially with angry scenes like these. Sorry but Neil looked lacklustre in front of him for the first time. Neil does emotional scenes really well but holy moly Yogi nailed the quiet angry man demeanor.

I hope they give him more screenspace, he totally deserves it.

Samrat stood for Sai like like her husband has never... (Probably he did during Devkit marriage.. ) He did not let others talk nonsense about her...he stooped them from bad mouthing her and warned them from misbehaving with her.. He gave them a plain Shut Up call ..BAS!! No making faces and raising hands , bas shut up call..

Yogi was the star for sure...his voice modulation , expressions and dialogue delivery...Everything was damn good.. His Chaabi de is still stuck here..

Originally posted by: Bana

Interesting question. I wonder how Neil does this nonsense with any conviction.

I think he acts very well

Virat is doing something .. which virat himself has not thought that he could do ..

Neil is playing that quite well ..

he feels he has done nothing wrong .. but in his heart he knows .. Neil has played this well .. the diffident virat ..

Originally posted by: Bana

The first thing Ashwini asked when she came to know if Virat's kaand was to ask "What did Sai do". The cracks are showing.

Unbelievably pathetic! This lady Ashwini never impressed me from the start. She is decent enough not to hurt people but she is definitely not mahaan. She has never stood up properly for herself. She let Devi down by not probing deeper into what troubles her. She has failed to correct Virat except mildly on a couple of occasions. She projects Virat’s faults & failings onto Sai as she did today. She loves Sai because she knows Sai is good for her son. And, also because Sai gives Ashwini a voice - the evil trio were bang on when they once taunted that Ashwini is merely using Sai to shoot from her shoulder.

Unfortunately she is being portrayed as this wonderful mahaan character who is the best saas ever, and the trp aunties will be loving her & modelling themselves on her - so if they ever see their son beating his wife they can immediately ask what mistake did she do, not how dare u hit her.

I think I am in the minority who still feel for Ashwini. Many are disappointed that she never takes stand for Sai or for anybody. Coz till now she doesn't hv the guts to stand against her family. If a fearless n courageous girl like Sai has to go through somuch in that mad house, we can only imagine what she must have gone through in her entire life. Her husband and only son never stood up for her. Rest of the family treats her like she is nobody. Even PP treats her badly. 😡So I think to survive in that house she has become a submissive person.

But she is a mother whose heart is at right place. She loves Sai and wants to protect her. That's why today she immediately realized the mess is definitely related to Sai. But instead of asking what happened to Sai,she asked what did Sai do now? 😆

Anywz I loved today's episode. Samrat was on fire today. 🥳 Sai spoke about the emotional attachment of Virat with PP. 👏very very appropriate. We all are fed up with Virat 's double faced behavior. Devi Tai is ❤️.

I got irritated seeing Virat 's expressions. He didn't hv any valid reasons to justify his act ,only giving those weird expressions 😡show mei hi kuch nahi tha justify karne ko toh interview mei Neil kya itna bol raha tha khudko justify karne ke liy Royally ignored a certain someone 😃

Overall it was a good episode.

Congratulations to the team of Ghum for completing 300 episodes. Also congratulations to the fans who have shown tremendous patience in tolerating the show onscreen and Offscreen. 😃🥳

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

Don't think he is unconvinced with virat locking sai drama by seeing his interviews in segments about this scene. He said both sai & virat are right in their places. While doing hand holding scene he openly said virat is wrong but this time🙂.

Interview part is a separate argument....these guys will say anything..😵

The thing is as an actor, logically, it is very hard to connect to certain scenes because the actions are contradictory to other established aspects of his character....so acting-wise it will be difficult to do such scenes.