Originally posted by: Angela_Grokes
See dear, what you said about being chosen as the 'Best Leader' and the consequences - that was the way they represented your action. You opened your hair. There was nothing wrong in that. But! They way they (whoever they were) presented your action, it was looked as a wrong action. Just like some people say that Duryodhan was wrong to use the rules. But he was not! Right. He broke no rule but he used the rules in a way which they benefitted him. Mso his means were not wrong. Hence blaming the means makes no sense. So even if people see means first rather than the complete action in this case, it makes no sense entirely. And in my FF too you should better look at the end because everyone knows what will happen but the ending of this track is still under the sheets of fog. Then I never said Duryodhan discriminated on the basis of Cates for creed. In fact I consider him better than Pandavs in this case. As of you said that promoting a wrong message in the society doesn't make you unjust, why doesn't it! It does make you unjust. Because you support the wrong with will lead to injustice. Right or not? All of them who were present in Dyut Sabha were unjust. Why? Because they never spoke against never spoke against the injustice Draupadi had to go through. So they were unjust because they never spoke out in favour justice and promoted a wrong message. And Dharma can never be bound to some text or Many Samhita. Because Krishna himself said that Dharma changes with time a d is different in every situation. So how can you decide that someone was just or unjust on the basis that he followed Manu Samhita's laws. Though I agree here that Dhritrashtra was unjust. Like I said a good administrator can be unjust. Dhritrashtra was unjust when he put his family ahead his subjects but he was a good administrator. Punishment and revenge are to faces of the same coin. Some may call punishment revenge but it cannot be called wrong. In EHT too they call punishment revenge. They showed revenge as a form of punishment. Just like I am presenting in my FF. And I do completely agree that Pandavs were no followers of Dharma, wholly. Because whatever great deeds Yudhishtir did in his life, he will always be called faulty for his silence in Dyut Sabha and his wrong decisions he made in Dyut Sabha will always be criticised and the same rests for the other four.
193