For a Reader to Digest- part2 page11 - Page 8

Originally posted by: Tiyali

This post is perfection!

I.agree.with.each.and.every.word.

As a writer, at the end of the day, can simply write and present your view, your creativity, vision to the best of your ability ( which is limitless and grows with time). The rest is upto the reader, really.

My friend had told me about you. Expect some serious stalking. 😆

Originally posted by: V323

I am not trying to say what a reader should do, and what they shouldn't do. They are my readers, and I respect the fact that they are taking the time out to READ. It is basically people who merely skim the update, to whom this is directed. Please don't misunderstand the intent of this post.

-V

Originally posted by: Inked

At the risk of displeasing Yash (but pleasing Arnav), I have a 6th point to add:

6. I appreciate a reader who takes a moment to click LIKE even if they only liked parts. I view the LIKE button as more of an "ACKNOWLEDGED" button. I see the number of likes as a barometer to gauge interest level. If I see LIKES going down over an extended period of time, I means I need to take a critical look at my work or maybe recognize that the story has reached a natural end and that it is time to start something new.

maya hill

Originally posted by: RamnVij

Interesting topic for discussion!

As a person who is predominantly a reader on this forum, and who really enjoys a Good read 😊, I feel the following are some of the traits which a 'good' reader could possess:

1) As you rightly said, one who really reads what the writer has put up. Takes time to soak in the plot nuance, characterization, turn of phrase, imagery, attention to detail. I feel the whole experience becomes a lot more worthwhile if the piece is savored as you would a delectable bit of Toblerone or Guylian chocolate- take the time to absorb all the aspects 😊.

2) Taking the time to 'Like' or Comment if the story touched/ impressed/ entertained them- this cements the bond between the writer and the reader. But I do feel knee jerk 'likes' or proforma 'Nice Update' comments just for the sake of commenting, are counter productive. If the reader feels a particular update didn't really live up to the standards the author may have set from their previous writing, I guess what is needed is a polite comment expressing what the reader really felt. Most of the really good authors anyway appreciate constructive criticism, and there is no point fueling the ego of those others who mandate only praise!

3) Further to the above, 'constructive criticism' by definition means identifying what worked well as well as what didn't. Witty pot shots and sarcasm cannot form part of a constructive critique. I have seen reader comments using terms which seemed to be comments on the writer's personality and behavior rather than their writing. Definitely to be avoided, unless the reader is spoiling for a slanging match 😊

Lastly, would like to put forward that the good writer/ good reader discussion is 2 sides of the same coin, really. Good readers can encourage the writer with their constructive response, while a good writer can generate and nurture interest from the readers by being open to feedback. As to who comes first- that's the chicken and egg situation again, isn't it !!

Cheers...