😃 Again I am writing for the same topic "Why Qazi".
See every person has his own views so why one person likes someone and the other dosent shouldnt be an issue of discussion. Like once Jagjit Singh had said I would never ever sing Bappi Lahiri type songs though we both admire each other very much. So here the question liking comes and why sumone likes sumbody and not the other one cant alwsy be expaliend by logics. Who accepts what and why is really difficult to define?
SO lets discuss it from Gurukul perspective. Gurukul has appointed four judges they are supposed to judge who should be in danger and who shouldnt. These are all musically trained people so we shdnt question their ability. These judges have found till date Qazi the weakest (they send him most number of times ie 7 in danger zone), then Shamit (second highest in rank may be 5 or 6 times not quite sure) , then Arijit and Rex (4 times each). If we say Qazi was send there coz he cant sing and others due to controversy, I feel we are being a bit partial. If controversy is there then why not with Arpita or Ruprekha, means they didnt give the judges the least possible chance also point at them. SO lets rank them according to the results ( I mean danger zone and top student).
1. Ruprekha
2. Arpita
3. Arijit
4. Rex
5. Shamit
6. Qazi
Now lets take the case of other talented singers like Anubhav, Mona, Kirti and people who had to leave. If u see statistics all of them were placed in danger zone lesser number of times than Shamit or Qazi. So if we go by that, Shamit and Qazi and then Arijit should leave and others should stay (if judges had to decide only and Janta and students and faculty were not there this would have happened long ago). But now we are seeing Qazi always saved by Janta, Shamit always saved by students and any thrid person who is in danger zone with them has to leave. This is happening week after week, if Qazi fans are chanting "Qazi is improving, Qazi is improving", Shamit fans are chanting "he deserves it, he deserves it"
My question is if Qazi is improving and Shamit really deserves it why cant judges see that. I understand Janta is voting for "CRAP" and students voting for "Bhaiya" but judges why are they thinking both Qazi and Shamit equally "CRAP" and putting them in danger zone together everytime when as per Qazi fans Qazi doesnt sing well but is trying to improve and has very good X-factor but as per Shamit fans he is the best and one of the most talented ones in Gurukul.😕
Now if judges make the WORST and BEST stand in the same platform every time what bechara untrained and having a "CRAP sense of music" Janta supposed to do. They understand the Bappi Lahiri thing more they are saving Qazi and Jagjit Singhs are going home. If u keep diamond and american diamond together common people will use American Diamond only not the real one they cant afford to even understand its quality, they have their limitations. But judges they should understnad whos the Diamond and whos the American Diamond. If judges too think Shamit is not the real Diamond and place him with American Diamond Qazi everytime I really have to suspect Shamit's ability.
And as per Symbionn if judges are also reading out of a script then it will go as per the script whether someone deserves of not hardly matters.
So guyz let us vote for the contestant we like and lets everyone hope that our favorites win. Coz if u expect common Janta will start buying diamonds when they have a substitute u are wrong. They will always go for the glittery thing rather than the gold. This is called mass appeal this is called showmanship.
Book Talk
Anupamaa
