Pray for long life of husband, but dont act. What a rule. - Page 2

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

@Simran we need to understand for some men, women are still property. Property to be owned. And it is 1940.

Acid attacks the worst thing that happens to a woman due to this property mentality. If you cant be mine, then you will live, but you wont be anyone else's

So CVs using it for Awdhesh I am fine. It shows his sanskaar( or rather lack of it). Yes I agree. RM understood Awdhesh's other intention that is why she gave RGD the poison.

And I guess RM has also understood who killed Yasodha. And she rightly said. Murder has happened so evidence will come. I am damn sure Koki is gonna do something foolish to hide her guilt which will land her in trouble for sure.

shruthi, am cool with them showing Avdesh's lack of sanskar. my gripe is their attempt in giving it a romantic spin, wit hthe fall & catch and that stupid song.
That romanticizes an evil intention.

Koki- waht'll happen when caught? RM has hid this frm RNj.Will he deliver justice to a loyal employee ?

@Simran if you have watched EHT you wouldn't have felt anything with that song. Because we know it is just lust, not romance and it looks just that. The ring tone they had given to Shaurya Goenka in EHT and the way he touches Durga even post her marriage to Dev, even after her denying, his attempt to hold her 🤢, I would say Awdhesh was much better. RNJ has to deliver justice to Yasodha. But then proof has to come. Because king can deliver justice only when proof is there. But for that RM has to know why Yasodha was killed. That " Why" is the big question mark here. Her connection to Lakhan

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

@Simran if you have watched EHT you wouldn't have felt anything with that song. Because we know it is just lust, not romance and it looks just that. The ring tone they had given to Shaurya Goenka in EHT and the way he touches Durga even post her marriage to Dev, even after her denying, his attempt to hold her 🤢, I would say Awdhesh was much better. RNJ has to deliver justice to Yasodha. But then proof has to come. Because king can deliver justice only when proof is there. But for that RM has to know why Yasodha was killed. That " Why" is the big question mark here. Her connection to Lakhan

I watched only few epis of EHT and mt understanding is Durga was a challenge to Shaurya, she deliberately provoked his massive ego and he just wanted to bed her to prove his supremacy.
I've not heard the song or watched post marriage scenes. I think, Shauraya didn't see her a "thing" like Avdesh here to be taken, Durga was someone he wanted to win.

Here, RGD is samae as the Rajmahal & other trappings that go with it for Avdesh. she just happens to be a pretty face he rescued before.

@bold- true. That's why RM is hunting for proof. I liked it they showed a Dr briefing her, after postmortem probably.

What do you win Simran. Can a woman be won. Can she be a deal. Can she be a bet. The moment a bet is kept on a woman she becomes a property. Shaurya wanted to win Durga because he wanted to win the bet of 5 crore. A price tag put on a ONS with a woman. And yes driver's daughter Nithya Mitra's price tag was 1lac and Dr Dayal Thakur's daughter's price tag became 5 crore. She was like anything he bought. Cars, gadgets, champagne. Use and throw.

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

What do you win Simran. Can a woman be won. Can she be a deal. Can she be a bet. The moment a bet is kept on a woman she becomes a property. Shaurya wanted to win Durga because he wanted to win the bet of 5 crore. A price tag put on a ONS with a woman. And yes driver's daughter Nithya Mitra's price tag was 1lac and Dr Dayal Thakur's daughter's price tag became 5 crore. She was like anything he bought. Cars, gadgets, champagne. Use and throw.

Durga only made that winning the bet an obsession as Shaurya's ego didn't allow him to lose the bet.

One way or the other men like Awadhesh, Shaurya and many real life men like them use woman as a property.

Shruthi, agree with you.

i didn't now abt the bet part, as i watched only couple of episode randomly and assumed S was just after her to boost his ego.

And that's what differentiates men like RNJ Simran. Even RNJ gets a beautiful lady as wife, before his feelings are evoked for her, he couldn't go near her physically. Men like Awadhesh wouldn't have thought second time to bed a woman like G if they got her even as a deal.

Shruthi...I think we are all old fashioned...for us equality does not imply conflict...it does not even mean 50-50...it means give and take where the needle tilts in favour of one partner or the other...and but it all evens out in the end...!

Yes Bertie. The beauty of the marriage is to know when to step in front and when to move back. That is where mutual respect and understanding happens. Even Vedic marriage rituals shows man walking in front of 4 pheras and woman walking in front for 3 pheras. So that itself symbolizes depending on the situation one has to take charge and other has to follow. And there is no harm in following when the need rises is my take.

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

Yes Bertie. The beauty of the marriage is to know when to step in front and when to move back. That is where mutual respect and understanding happens. Even Vedic marriage rituals shows man walking in front of 4 pheras and woman walking in front for 3 pheras. So that itself symbolizes depending on the situation one has to take charge and other has to follow. And there is no harm in following when the need rises is my take.

MCP can tell they got 1 phera extra, feminists can tell with 3 they equal 4. Whatever be the case it all boils down to mutual love, respect and understanding in the end.

Wife or husband cannot force the other to do what they seem is right.