In reply .... - Page 2

Originally posted by: westindian

Totally agree...

P.S. Love your dp

Originally posted by: mandu

We have great taste !!😃

Originally posted by: mandu

We have great taste !!😃

You are so right. Even I was baffled as to how can one even think that Kam..la and Pa..akhi are positive characters; a very twisted concept of good they have. I actually fear for the people who think this way. Not only are the portrayal of these two ladies unrealistic, they are extremely unhealthy. They have even taken altruism to the extent of it seeming pathological. In their desire to maintain her so called "goodypants" character and the future plot as it seems, they have made Paakhi spit meaningless dialogues and scenes to support the planned story without letting it grow out of her as a character. What I see is that the writers, creatives, and directors just did not FEEL the characters. The lost whatever vision they had. Everything; the characterization, story, editing, and acting were choppy.

I feel that maybe the creatives didn't have a strong concept of the characters to begin with. Or perhaps they bit off more than they can chew. What they show doesn't match the message they expect to get across. They might have wanted to portray the complexity of the relationships and situation but failed miserably? If the writers are unable draw out a solid and convincing characterization of the characters, the directors wouldn't be able to bring it out on screen and the same goes to the actors who will only be portraying caricatures.

It is quite obvious that they are just trying to highlight certain aspects of the characters with exaggerated and out of place dialogues. The team think that they can just get their point across with loads and loads of ornate dialogues without the appropriate scenes to support it. If only they put their effort into shaping crisp and solid characters and scenes, they would have been able to get the desired message across and evoke the desired emotional responses from the audience.

Originally posted by: Syama_Luna

You are so right. Even I was baffled as to how can one even think that Kam..la and Pa..akhi are positive characters; a very twisted concept of good they have. I actually fear for the people who think this way. Not only are the portrayal of these two ladies unrealistic, they are extremely unhealthy. They have even taken altruism to the extent of it seeming pathological. In their desire to maintain her so called "goodypants" character and the future plot as it seems, they have made Paakhi spit meaningless dialogues and scenes to support the planned story without letting it grow out of her as a character. What I see is that the writers, creatives, and directors just did not FEEL the characters. The lost whatever vision they had. Everything; the characterization, story, editing, and acting were choppy.

I feel that maybe the creatives didn't have a strong concept of the characters to begin with. Or perhaps they bit off more than they can chew. What they show doesn't match the message they expect to get across. They might have wanted to portray the complexity of the relationships and situation but failed miserably? If the writers are unable draw out a solid and convincing characterization of the characters, the directors wouldn't be able to bring it out on screen and the same goes to the actors who will only be portraying caricatures.

It is quite obvious that they are just trying to highlight certain aspects of the characters with exaggerated and out of place dialogues. The team think that they can just get their point across with loads and loads of ornate dialogues without the appropriate scenes to support it. If only they put their effort into shaping crisp and solid characters and scenes, they would have been able to get the desired message across and evoke the desired emotional responses from the audience.

Even the actors are just buying the crap they are asked to portray. Either they are so sucked into the characters or are afraid to accept or let sink in that they are portraying these horrifying characters.

You're right. Instead of blaming and ridiculing audience and fans, they should look at their work and analyse why they are unable to elicit the responses they sought. It is astonishing that they haven't realised that it is them that have failed, not the audience.

Originally posted by: Infofan

Oh yes we do. 😆

Agree with rest of your post too but too tired of ranting on this topic.

Quoting from one of my previous post -

Kamla and Pakhi are the two worst written 'positive' and 'good' characters on TV. They fail to evoke any empathy or sympathy and people can not relate to them. Crappy story line just adds to people's intolerance and dislike of them.