Why a mother would give up her child? - Page 2

Originally posted by: munnihyderabad

Sabeeha.. there you go with the logic part...

3:40 minutes drive took them more than 18 hrs 😕

SB's son - do we see Ekta's twist here 😕 i guess not ..but what are the other rare chances of a mom leaving behind her baby

Originally posted by: sabeeha

Lol, I'm pretty much the opposite; been up to my eyes in work but I'm guessing that's the difference between a teacher and a pupil :P

That just really stood out for me because honestly every now and again, they keep throwing these horrendous bloopers in. I've been in bad traffic, but that surely takes the biscuit rofl

Originally posted by: Virmanishal

have to see where SB track goes.cant comment much there.

about the rest, well they need a lot of logic.. There are stupid bloopers and inconsistencies every single day.

One you already mentioned,

J's running away never had any meaning.. Next, they allowed Manvi to keep 9 days fast and now they aren't letting her fast for even one day..i know KC is tougher, navratris are relatively more flexible but still 9 days !!

Virat's and Manvi's maturity quotient vary more than Manvi's height in VirMan hugs. Two months they keep chanting how Virat has matured and the next day,bam!! Vadheras are back to their old jaap.Same goes for Manvi.Its like they have nothing to show, they insert a maturity scene.

And the list goes on.

Originally posted by: -Pj-

But Munni, I could understand a character (women) leaving their child, (if the writing matched up) however it doesn't fit for Swamini because of her maternal closeness to Viren. Unless she is a person who can love other peoples children but can't handle having their own. (But I don't think that fits either)

P.S Munni ignore this, as it makes no sense

Originally posted by: -Pj-

Don't be mistaken I had work, I still have some. But I don't have to go to work.

Bloopers and inconsistencies are everywhere and there not even that we have to search for them. There obviously, pointing you in the face. The Biggest blooper for me is simply Maanvi's hair

Originally posted by: munnihyderabad

pooja - i agree if a dad left his son ... that is quite probable had the mom moved away from dad and never told him of conceiving

but how can we justify a mom leaving her baby and not once is she aware or lost in thoughts of the baby.. you know what i mean .. she never ever mentioned or thought back of her son ..if she knew he was alive..

the only possible twist is ekta twist ,.. they dadaji or her husband might have told her of the baby being still born

Originally posted by: sabeeha

Lmao, yes, yes, you teachers pretty much have a heck load more to do. I could not possibly be a teacher for the fact alone of marking homework and coursework, even if you get like three months off.

Oh Manvi's hair, I'd kinda brushed that to the side after Jeev's giving her that wig on the mehendi. In my mind, she's still wearing a wig! And like someone else said, erm, do we actually know why Jeevika really ran away?

Originally posted by: -Pj-

A dad is a different story entirely. However, I think IF (and I mean if) it was portrayed in a way that she could have either her child or given it up for adoption, with a valid reason that can make sense. You never know Swamini could have been off the rails as a teenager. Yet, I still agree that thought should not be lacking from Swamini's part.

I don't no if they can do an Ekta twist as she saw the guy in the show as an adult. So if she was told her child was a still born then that wouldn't match up.

Originally posted by: munnihyderabad

now don't get me over J's running away .. I vented on every possible way .. hell .. now she is no more di .. she is just Jeevika- aadarsh mature bahu of vadheras and wife of Viren ...

and the most annoying thing is Vadheras accepting her without a single question