Why is Raj sympathized for being a victim of a forced marriage whereas Dev too was blackmailed to marry Durga ?
Raj is a criminal but Dev is an innocent person.
Raj had a crime to hide but Dev only wants to find his friend.
Raj had plans to eliminate Sakshi as soon as he finds the tape but Dev is clueless even if Nitya loves him and will he be able to let Durga go out of his life.
If we talk about love, even Dev is suffering a forced marriage.We all know Nitya is Dev but Dev has no clue about it. So , there is no reason why Dev's pain can be taken for granted. Lets say he comes to know that Nitya and Durga are same person and yet refuse to take this girl for she is not really NItya anymore.Nitya was straightforward whereas Durga we have to agree is pretty much a manipulative person. We have keep this option open for this man also. He has the right to decide if he will love Nitya as Durga.
Sakshi blackmailed Raj and married him.Raj knows she was Mrs. Rehmat Khan before marrying him but Dayal not only blackmailed but also let Durga forge her identity to marry Dev.
So my question is :
Why DevGa marriage is morally correct and Raj- Saksh marriage is morally incorrect? What decides the legality of a blackmail ? The motive ?
Your views please:
Please note : 1. It is not a bashing post or a negative post
2. Please stick to the objective of the topic.
3. NO personal comments, bashing, calling names please.
Edited by dey.bh - 10 years ago