Is this correct on Vatsal's part?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#21

Originally posted by: dey.bh

This pic we all know what it is about. It cannot dignify crime in any manner, As i have already said , it is just one of those pics we get to see in every show. Even, newspaper these days come with such photographs which are infact a real life picture and not any fiction.

What?😲 Which newspaper has shown selfies with dead body in a smiling pose? Kaunse area ka paper hai? Enlighten me please.

Press has certain standards in place. Nobody publishes BS like this.

Quote

dey.bh

@dey.bh

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#22

Lol atominis.. Indian media has been in rounds for insensible things. This is quite common. One such picture was from Gujarat riots. Quite recently a picture from the Badaun case was there. I shall not name the newspapers here to avoid controversy.

Remember the Mumbai attacks, the media went on to give each detail about how the policemen were working thus faciliting the job of the terrorists.It was then some guidelines were issued for media. Thankfully, now they have some limitations.

At least 2 years ago Assam was rocked by a case of molestation. The media shamelessly recorded the whole event and later put it on the television. None of them thought of calling the police instead. Height of insensitiveness.

Atominis, I can give you a whole list of insensible media cases. Only, I wont name them here.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#23

I know about those. I specifically asked about anyone smiling besides a dead body and taking selfies.

Quote

dey.bh

@dey.bh

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#24

Originally posted by: atominis
I know about those. I specifically asked about anyone smiling besides a dead body and taking selfies.

Lol.. wasn't that a fictional scene ? How can we have such pics in other sources ? I am only comparing insensible actions of the society and other instituions . Vatsal in this regard is only flaunting a fake photograph.

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#25

Originally posted by: dey.bh
Lol.. wasn't that a fictional scene ? How can we have such pics in other sources ? I am only comparing insensible actions of the society and other instituions . Vatsal in this regard is only flaunting a fake photograph.

Flaunting a fake photo on real profile.

Point is the kind of photo that it is. Never seen any other actor who plays villain, flaunt acts like this and have fans laughing over it.

Fiction should have remained limited to fiction that is on TV.

What next? Selfies of rape scene shooting?

Quote

dey.bh

@dey.bh

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#26

All I can say is you have a point of view and I respect your point of view.

My approach is more practical. I see this just as another picture and nothing more than that. In any case, Vatsal's actions do not bother me anyways. I am more concerned about Shaurya's selfie. I always thought it wasn't necessary thing to show.

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#27

I had stopped this debate earlier also. To each his own. I personally hated this action both in show and now its flaunting on social networks. And I believe EHT is glorifying and glamorising villains like Yash Chopra did in Darr.

Quote

@bugsbunny12

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#28

Ok Ok...i see u are not to be convinced...

lets end the matter here...u win...but i still say vatsal is not promoting the crime that has happened onscreen...he just put it up as a memory of the scene he shot not done in reality ...he wouldn't have even thought that ppl would take its meaning like this? and its unreal so its not a big deal...its just a simple difference between reel and real...and u say its not shaurya goenka account, its vatsal's right? well...shaurya is fictional...vatsal is real...the pic is fictional...the acting is real...hope u understand...anyway...

we both have different POVs and they'll never match...so no point arguing it out...

no hard feelings

Quote

dey.bh

@dey.bh

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#29

Lol.. Indian shows have some liking for criminals. In some cases, they just wind up the tracks and people suddenly turn a new leaf

i know this incident is not relevant here but this was kind of funny. Quite a few days back, in another forum we were discussing if mental harassment was any harassment at all. Surprisingly, there are few members don't think mental harassment is any kind of torture.😆One saas forces her bahu to severe all relations with her maika, would not let her visit her maika and also not to forget forced her to testify against her maika in the court and all these are not to be taken as 'torture' or 'harrasment' because Sasusa was not in her senses then. Therefore, she deserves no punishment.

I don't understand, ye log ( show makers) acche lawyer pe thoda paisa kyu kharch nahi kar sakte jo inko legal baatien thoda bohot sikha sake. They have no idea what is legal and what is ilegal.😆

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#30

Originally posted by: kriya37
Ok Ok...i see u are not to be convinced...

lets end the matter here...u win...but i still say vatsal is not promoting the crime that has happened onscreen...he just put it up as a memory of the scene he shot not done in reality ...he wouldn't have even thought that ppl would take its meaning like this?

@BOLD

There is no match going on here where one has to lose or win. Thank you for the sarcastic response.

How you assumehe wouldn't have thought people would take meaning like this or not? He clearly enjoys the responses and laughs along himself as if Shaurya's acts are something funny.

Quote

1 2 3 4

Is this correct on Vatsal's part? - Page 3

Related Topics

Explore Topics