I really respect your opinion, but I kind of disagree.
Regarding kamini and Ramnath, what you've said is correct but to an extent. I mean maybe he is closer to her and sharing stuff but that doesn't mean he simply keeps his brother out of the picture. And kamini, according to what you've written, should be closer to lalaji, that is her spouse. So I still don't see the logic in this. You just don't keep family members out of things and that too such important matters. At least kamini should go and share all this with her husband, if Ramnath has so much difficulty.
Nirmala was a lady who would flee in every difficult situation. That is correct! But you would think that after all these years, one learns a lesson. And doesn't repeat the same things again. CVs tried to show her as the victim and ram as the culprit. But in the end, she is equally the culprit because she is one selfish lady.
I agree, when parents are involved, certain things change. However, here It wasn't even about that matter anymore. This was only about her pct. And Shravan heard the essential part, he didn't miss the important part that sumo told Ramnath. Which is why he was able to recall it later inside the conference room. And sumo wasn't even being rude to Ramnath, she questioned him. For which, Shravan's anger was not needed. And you know when you're someone's true friend and a problem occurs, you don't go and butcher their life regardless of the fact if parents are involved or not. And it's true Shravan isn't aware of his fathers deeds, however as a true friend, he could've asked sumo to move her pct elsewhere and he wouldve helped in finding a plot for her. This would just prevent the demolition. But wait, he didn't even study the case properly, so he was unaware about pct. okay fine! But after hearing all that, he could've sat with her and discussed the matter with her instead of asking her to get lost.
And I didn't say Pushkar and Sumo's friendship is new. I meant that these two know each other for a lesser amount of time than Shravan and Sumo know each other. And you would think that a person who knows someone for over a decade would trust them since he/she is his/her true friend. But here, Pushkar has known sumo for a lesser amount of time and still believes in her. He values the friendship. And I agree, Shravan has trust issues. But tbh, his trust issues are quite absurd. In the real world, if anyone's mother abandons them, the child would grow up as a much stronger person. And wouldn't judge everyone based on that because he would learn from his past. And the fact that Shravan called sumo a liar and a selfish person doesn't even fit in. Because what sumo did was not a selfish act at all. Shravan seems to value his father a lot because he has no proof against his father, when his father is actually evil in real. Didn't he think about how hurt sumo was when her pct, which was on her mother's name, was demolished? Instead he shouted. I couldn't understand this at all. A true friend understands each other. At least sumo had realized her mistake of hurting him and his great father. Shravan just goes on to say he did the correct thing.
So all these things really bothered me in yesterday's episode. I know I disagreed with quite a bit of your opinion, but I still respect it and I know what you were trying to say. :)
Jodha Akbar
Anupamaa
