What do they mean - Mj is Kalyug ka ram?? - Page 3

Originally posted by: LeenaRG

Just my point, in MJ, we've seen both these forms, the characterization was perfect so why add another angle to it, that too a completely different one? I understand the sentiment behind it, but given that they have already established MJ as Shiv, I don't see the relevance of bringing Ram into the picture. I feel it was unnecessary & doesn't sit well with the story. If we must have Devi Devtas in our shows the least they can do is stick with one. Neel/Mrityunjay, Ram. Who next?😕

PS: I think we've digressed from Anjana's question, so I'll leave the topic here for others to continue with their thoughts.

Originally posted by: misty85

Plus in terms of marital relationships analogy of ram-sita is given ... not that of shiv-parvati...

Originally posted by: misty85

Right... but Shiv was married before... though parvati is considered to be sati's avtar... when it come to define best jodi people use only ram & sita... because when ram was asked to marry again to perform rituals, etc he refused.

Originally posted by: dsnair

Yes he made a dummy of sita Instaed ...

Also i feel ths ram ref is for the audience ,

As Tara ws questioning on Mjs character and kakas support for his daughters killer

Bt as anjana said people wi'll get worried whthr MJ will abandon Tara 😆

Originally posted by: dsnair

Yes he made a dummy of sita Instaed ...

Also i feel ths ram ref is for the audience ,

As Tara ws questioning on Mjs character and kakas support for his daughters killer

Bt as anjana said people wi'll get worried whthr MJ will abandon Tara 😆

well he is already going to... in ME... he asked tara to go to her mom's place before as well... this is also kind of abandoning... but kaka gave the best allegory available in mythology. 😉

Originally posted by: Shaina_b

Shiv-Parvati is also given!!!!!

Given the fact that Ram left Sita when she was pregnant, they are hardly an idea pair!!!!!

Shiva on the other hand even lay down at Kali's feet to cool her anger!!!!!

Did Mrityunjay not stay quiet when Tara was angry and tolerate everything??

I'm getting your point... I already said Ram's character had many flaws... & your objection is very much valid... but Ram's analogy is perfect in the case because 1. Ram left his kingdom to keep his father's promise (here MJ seems to be leaving property, etc for the promise of Nirmala) 2. In his life time Ram never married again.
I've already said that MJ's character draws many things from shiva so it won't be wrong if I say MJ is combination of both Shiva & Ram... So for me analogy was perfect.

Ram ne 14 saal vanvas kata MJ umarkaid katne wala hai.
Ram apni sauteli maa kaiykai ke vachan ki wazah se vanvas gaye. MJ ne bhi apni maa se koi vada kiya hai jis wazah se wo jail wapus jayega.

MJ raam hai pe tara sita nahi.

Originally posted by: misty85

I'm getting your point... I already said Ram's character had many flaws... & your objection is very much valid... but Ram's analogy is perfect in the case because 1. Ram left his kingdom to keep his father's promise (here MJ seems to be leaving property, etc for the promise of Nirmala) 2. In his life time Ram never married again.
I've already said that MJ's character draws many things from shiva so it won't be wrong if I say MJ is combination of both Shiva & Ram... So for me analogy was perfect.

Originally posted by: misty85

well he is already going to... in ME... he asked tara to go to her mom's place before as well... this is also kind of abandoning... but kaka gave the best allegory available in mythology. 😉

Originally posted by: poojaluvnbt

Ram ne 14 saal vanvas kata MJ umarkaid katne wala hai.
Ram apni sauteli maa kaiykai ke vachan ki wazah se vanvas gaye. MJ ne bhi apni maa se koi vada kiya hai jis wazah se wo jail wapus jayega.

MJ raam hai pe tara sita nahi.