Are Radhika and Sam really that different?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Vimal M

@VIMAL.SM

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

#41

Radhs has right to fall for any one .Love happens without thinking.But she should not keep anyone be it Sam or Saral in darkness .She should say the truth to Saral n break her engagement with him.

Quote

Erika

@roni_berna

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 10 years ago

#42

Originally posted by: VIMAL.M
Sam is not perfect she has flaws .That's what made me to get attracted to Sam than Radhika .No human is not so perfect.

Sam is attracted to Arjun.It will take Sam to understand that she truly loves Arjun or it's just infatuation.

Reg Sam not seeing Neil love for her.For past 20 years Neil has been doing the same .That's being her pillar of support,cheering her up when she is upset or has bad mood .This not nothing new to Sam .Because she knew as a friend Neil has been always there for her.So she is not seeing the love Neil has for her.Because she has always seen him as a friend only.

How old is Sam and Neil? Sam I guess was a kid when she was friends with Neil and best friends always support each other but now since Neil feels for Sam, it shouldn't take time to realize that he loves her. He does give her hints at times but she doesn't get it and hence Neil said that "Will Sam ever understand my love for her?" Now Sam is still looking immature to understand the meaning of love and hence she is playing pranks to prove her point which doesn't sound sensible. She doesn't understand the TRUE MEANING OF LOVE. That's what her character is shown as for me.

Originally posted by: sumanbuttan

Small town girls are generally grown up in a conservative families same as Radhika but Sam's upbringing was done in a modern family. This is the difference between their backgrounds.

Radz enjoyed the intimacy and her smiling face was the proof of that and after Arjun left the lift then she had a tear in her eyes .May be she remembered her background and after gaining her sense she stopped him in the swimming pool. But in the lift she was totally confusing.

Rads was more lost than enjoying the intimacy. She then wanted to apologize to Arjun as she thought that he only wanted to save her and not that she wanted to kiss him or wanted him to kiss her.

Radhika's character isn't confusing but she is now confused as she is falling for Arjun. There is a saying that "Love doesn't have any explanation. When it happens, it just happens. One doesn't see if they are committed, married, or think about the other person they are falling for. Ishq kar zor nahin hai ye voh aatish ghalib Jo lagaye na lage aur bujhaye na bane."

If Radhika is falling in love, it isn't wrong but yes, if she wants Arjun in her life without breaking her engagement, it would be wrong as Indian audience is still narrow minded and doesn't accept such relationships even though it's absolutely LEGAL. She first needs to end her relationship with Saral and then marry Arjun.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

clarity

@clarity

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 10 years ago

#43

Neither Rads or Sam are "at fault" for getting close to Arjun. Why is Arjun not being blamed here for getting close to different girls? Why? Just because he is a guy? I don't think any of them are at fault here, including Arjun. Physical proximity is a natural part of love and everyone who loves someone, would want to be close to them. Don't you like hugging your friends, sisters etc? Why is there a taboo against romantic proximity? It's just the culture of always blaming women for 'upholding their honour'. Why is the onus always on them? I don't understand.

So, IMO, neither Radhika or Sam are 'wrong'.

Quote

Anju..

@Anju..

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

#44

@erikalui i disagree with indian audience narrow mind statement at any place its not acceptable even if its legal

Quote

Anju..

@Anju..

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

#45

@clarity sorry for gng offtopic When sam cant love a person in few weeks then 1day is so very less isnt it? Calling sams feeling for arjun infatuation is ridiculous coz sam got emotionally attached to him d way he talked to samrat n brought him to party made her like him its may not be love but not infatuation r anything physical for sure

Quote

Erika

@roni_berna

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 10 years ago

#46

Originally posted by: arshita235
@erikalui i disagree with indian audience narrow mind statement at any place its not acceptable even if its legal

OK this is your viewpoint and I respect that.

At the same time I don't know how Radhika and Arjun's relationship isn't acceptable if they are both unmarried. This BF stealing and committed thing is what used to happen in ancient times.

If Sam loves Arjun in spite of her being hurt because of him, it doesn't make her practical as it would be just being blindly in love with a man who wants to destroy you. She doesn't understand love then and now her love is immature. It's Neil who loves her unconditionally.

But anyways, I guess I've already said what I feel. 😳

Quote

AnuMP

@AnuMP

Rocker

Posted: 10 years ago

#47

Clarity (Apu, I think)

I simply don't get why Sam is thought of as wrong here. She was acting on what she believed was a mutual attraction between otherwise unattached people. I have seen posts about her lacking in small town values, as if values are not universal! I have seen posts about Sam's 'aukad'. I know what the word means, but what did that post mean?

I mean we somehow managed to get to a population of 1 billion. There must have been some physical interaction, no?😆

But somehow when a woman is honest about her desires she is painted as fast / loose.

I don't think Rads can be blamed either because she is not actively looking to fall in love. But, if she does, she will need to clarify her situation with Saral and check with Sam before acting on her attraction to Arjun. Legality is one thing but ethics is something else. I thought the way she got her job was completely unethical and definitely passive-aggressive. Hopefully, she won't go the same route with her personal relationships.

I would call Sam naive and Rads foolish. Sam for blindly believing the first man who shows signs of affection. Rads for putting up with physical abuse and apparently being attracted to bullying and violence, that is in addition to being slightly unethical.

Arjun, OTOH, can and should be blamed for the immoral/unethical/criminal things he has done. And what if he retreats? Does that take away the harm he has already caused to Sam? AND WHAT ABOUT BONNIE? He has already cost her emotionally and professionally; no one may hire her given the record of corporate sabitage.Is Arjun not going to pay for that? Or are 'fast' girls like Bonnie considered roadkill?

Edited by AnuMP - 10 years ago

Quote

Megha (Vishav Kirti) Sharma

@dmegha

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

#48

People are behaving illogically and commenting like kids as if they haven't been given their fav you!
Neither Sam nor Radz is to be blamed.
The whole forums is divided into team Radz and team Sam
Nobody is team Manmarzian.
Sam still has to realize meaning of true love and Radz needs to stop acting immaturely at times.
And for god sake stop saying that radz enjoys intimacy with Arjun and that she stole him from Sam.
Arjun is not a thing or a status symbol!!

Quote

Anju..

@Anju..

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

#49

Agree neil loves her unconditionally but its not mandatory for sam to reciprocate d same fellings ryt

Quote

clarity

@clarity

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 10 years ago

#50

Originally posted by: AnuMP
Clarity (Apu, I think)
I simply don't get why Sam is thought of as wrong here. She was acting on what she believed was a mutual attraction between otherwise unattached people. I have seen posts about her lacking in small town values, as if values are not universal! I have seen posts about Sam's 'aukad'. I know what the word means, but what did that post mean?

I mean we somehow managed to get to a population of 1 billion. There must have been some physical interaction, no?😆

But somehow when a woman is honest about her desires she is painted as fast / loose.

I don't think Rads can be blamed either because she is not actively looking to fall in love. But, if she does, she will need to clarify her situation with Saral and check with Sam before acting on her attraction to Arjun.

I would call Sam naive and Rads foolish. Sam for blindly believing the first man who shows signs of affection. Rads for putting up with physical abuse and apparently being attracted to bullying and violence.

Arjun, OTOH, can and should be blamed for the immoral/unethical/criminal things he has done. And what if he retreats? Dies that take away the harm he has already caused to Sam? AND WHAT ABOUT BONNIE? He has already cost her emotionally and professionally; no one may hire her given the record of corporate sabitage.Is Arjun not going to pay for that? Or are 'fast' girls like Bonnie considered roadkill?

You got it right, Anu. It's Appu.

@bold- Unfortunately, they are. Guess you didn't get the memo. 😕 Girls like Bonnie deserve everything they get and more, according to the world.

I completely agree with your assessment. Is Arjun not wrong for his grand revenge plan where he has already managed to affect Sam to an extent? Everyone seems to be pointing fingers at Rads/Sam, but nobody is thinking that these situations are happening spontaneously and it's not a sign of their 'aukad' if they choose to react a certain way. Why shouldn't Sam be able to act on a mutual attraction, as you said? Radhika should clarify things with both Saral and Sam, as you said. I don't understand why romantic intimacy is so vilified. It's just a natural process of love.

Also, the degree of 'self-control' girls supposedly show in these situations is not a yardstick to judge their moral fiber. 😡

Quote

1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8

Are Radhika and Sam really that different? - Page 5

Related Topics

Explore Topics