🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: AFG vs SL, 11th Match, Group B at Abu Dhabi🏏
HEALING SHUROO 18.9
Nerdtastically Navratri (CC Game, Sign Up Open)
Akash Ambani constantly holding radhika's hand and waist
Deepika Removed From Kalki 2
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 18, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Bigg Boss 19 Daily Discussion Thread - 19th Sept, 2025
The Ba***ds Of Bollywood - Reviews
VICTIM KAUN 🤧 19.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 19, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: India vs Oman, 12th Match, Group A at Abu Dhabi🏏
Buddhiya ki Nautanki
ABC Pulls Jimmy Kimmel Off Air for Charlie Kirk Comments
How quickly time changes
Anupamaa 18 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Pari's hate for Tulsi
Alia bhatt special topic
Armaan has always been the victim
Baseer rental house
Anupamaa 19 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
@ CanadianAddict ... You have echoed my thoughts 👏 👏!!!! There's absolutely no justification for that type of behaviour ... don't care how "hot" he is, he is nothing more than abuser!!! That's the way insecure and weak men try to prove that they are strong... ! No woman should have to take that sort of treatment ... !!!!
@CanadianAddict, I agree with your points, but I for one think this is a great show and it's showing the reality and and portraying it very much in a realistic manner.
The question is whether they are telling a love story, or a story of a girl who finally takes a stand and moves on from this.For me, she needs to move on, because anything other than her leaving him and moving on would be validating all the regressive lines spouted both on the show by many of the characters, as well as some of the thinking on how Urmi should change Samrat.How can one make a show concerning a topic, if they don't show the ugliness of the topic? The question is whether they validate all this ugliness and regressive thinking, or they have an ending telling us such views should not be validated and women shouldn't be expected to stick to such marriages.As for Urmi, her actions are realistic. See what her grandmother did. Girls go through this every day with their family telling them to adjust and stick it out, and make the marriage work. So again, I say, it's not a problem that they show Urmi still defending Samrat and acting a blind fool. The question is where this all leads. That is what will deem whether or not this show is regressive and misogynist.P.S. I too am down with the show. But my usage of the term differs to yours.😆 I commend this show and think the makers are doing a great job so far, and look forward to watching it every day.
Originally posted by: naina2010
Such a lovely post. 👏. You have told every thing. But this show is show casing those type of men, which are in this society and women are living with them from time immemorial.
But this show is showing what a women dreams and what is the reality. If you see a show where show is completely domestic violence and abusive husband, who treats women as shit, and director names it as pyaar.How rediculous just imagine, forum members think it's hot pair and support all nonsense shown their just because it's hot pair. This is the level of minds , what more can you expect.
I agree with you. This show is a mirror to millions of Men who are just like Samrat. Samrat makes my blood boil, but there are Men just like him. Yes, Urmi should move away from him - but breaking a marriage is not that easy either. They can show that Urmi finally masters the courage to get out - for breakings the norm in a society takes courage - esp. in a society when everyone tells to compromise and accept. Lets hope Cvs show a positive power of womenhood and how they can stand on their own feet...@CanadianAddict, I agree with your points, but I for one think this is a great show and it's showing the reality and and portraying it very much in a realistic manner.
The question is whether they are telling a love story, or a story of a girl who finally takes a stand and moves on from this.
For me, she needs to move on, because anything other than her leaving him and moving on would be validating all the regressive lines spouted both on the show by many of the characters, as well as some of the thinking on how Urmi should change Samrat.
How can one make a show concerning a topic, if they don't show the ugliness of the topic? The question is whether they validate all this ugliness and regressive thinking, or they have an ending telling us such views should not be validated and women shouldn't be expected to stick to such marriages.
As for Urmi, her actions are realistic. See what her grandmother did. Girls go through this every day with their family telling them to adjust and stick it out, and make the marriage work. So again, I say, it's not a problem that they show Urmi still defending Samrat and acting a blind fool. The question is where this all leads. That is what will deem whether or not this show is regressive and misogynist.
P.S. I too am down with the show. But my usage of the term differs to yours.😆 I commend this show and think the makers are doing a great job so far, and look forward to watching it every day.