🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: Match 19 - Final: India vs Pakistan @Dubai🏏
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread- 29th Sept 2025.
BOOTH ROAMING 28.9
PAAV PHISLAA 29.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 29 Sep 2025 EDT
🎶🎵Tribute to Lata Mangeshkar on Her 96th Birth Anniversary🎵🎶
Geetanjali to die?
And Janhvi gives another flop!!
India Won Asia Cup 2025- Trophy Missing! Glory Without the Trophy?
Maan and Geet- Love Wins Against All Odds..
Aishwarya Rai at the Paris fashion week
101 ways to patau your pati
Bhagwan Ke Charnon Mein Swarg
Trump's 100% tariff on Bollywood films
✦ Font-astic Voyage Contest Voting Round 1 | Invites ONLY ✦
That is making things senseless if raghav is unaware, we as viewers is aware of it and very much know abt the life of jhanvi so we are not blaming raghav... infact asking cv's for showing a person having feelings for a married woman wid out knowing anything abt her ...so if no one are at fault who are to be blamed ?The question was why does even Raghav love her? So Sia ka to sawal hi nahi hai yaha. Raghav does not know Sia is married and he started have feeling for her.
Even i am talking abt raghav 😊 where did i mention that there is a restriction on a married woman falling in love again ? 😕 i haven't said in any of my posts but there is a proper way for it its not like guy comes and says "i love u it happened" (though he is unaware of it) but she wouldn't react the same way saying "yes it happens and i love u too" particularly from a married woman perspective and in this show sia is best example for the same plot as till now we only got to see raghav's feelings for her and no improvement from sia 's side which is justified ...We are discussing Raghav's love here ... and he does not know she is married so he is very much normal only lol And there is no restriction on a married woman falling in love again specially those in similar situation as SIa but komal's response is regarding Raghav's love not Sia's
Ooops didn't see shivu responded
Sorry i didn't get how evilness of bad character has anything to do wid raghav falling in love? seriously it is getting things complicated ...what was the need for them to show him having feelings first ? i don't find any logic there itself 😕 now sooner or later he would come to know abt jahnvi's past then what would he think abt ...i don't think he would stare at her same way as he is doing now and wish he thinks only abt her pain and all that she went through ...so there's hell lot of difference in having feelings just like that and having them after knowing abt her past so in this case i prefer raghav feelings for sia after knowing abt her rather than before ..having said this i am not blaming raghav here i want to know what made cv's show a person having feelings for jhanvi wid out any base ...Does not that happen in the most of the show that viewers are always aware of all the evilness of bad character.
In Jhanvi and her husband case viewers were aware of all the torture and his game but CVs revealed it to her at very later in the show. So have patience CVs will reveal to Raghav also.
Ya i felt it differs for raghav and sia becoz now just imagine the same words what komal has written between raghav and sia ...if raghav says the same thing (though he is unaware of her ) to sia do u think sia accepts it normally ? 😕 i am sure no girl in sia's place would first think "whether raghav know abt her or not they just can't react normally once they get to know abt person feelings for them ...raghav's feelings at this phase doesn't effect sia anyway so what was the need to show him having feelings ? i don't find any base for him to have feelings on sia right now just as the way tm posted in her topic and yes in other post normal couple in the sense two ppl who are single wid no commitments wid others before ...Komal's reply was regarding raghav .,, you quoted her and wrote "that may be true for normal couples ..."
What does that mean? That you are saying its odd in Raghav's case that its love at first site for him (though i don't believe it was but thats not the argument here) is not right as its not normal couple
This is what anyone would understand reading your post and hence i replied to that ... if you did not mean that and meant something else then there is no argument at all