Top ten shows 23/01 to 29/01 DID @10

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Ankit

@ankit_nyc

Inactive

Posted: 14 years ago

#31

Originally posted by: Rapier

😛 ummm no unfair would be to say that DID Doubles is not nearly as good as DID 2 when it comes to ratings........because as the evidence shows, they are both pretty much the same in ratings......😛

Quote

Rapier

@Rapier

Rocker

Posted: 14 years ago

#32

Originally posted by: ankit_nyc

😛 Compare whatever you want.....the result is still the same, the difference between DID Doubles and DID 2 is miniscule in terms of ratings..........So people who keep saying that DID 2 was head and shoulders above DID doubles in terms of ratings are misleading the public.........😛 Terrence and Remo leaving DID has not impacted DID Doubles in any significant manner.....It is still the top dance show in the country and amongst the top 10 shows in the country.........😛

u compare things that are similar. it's a simple concept ankit.

and i guess its useless to tell u to stop misquoting people. u are saying the same thing over and over again, and i don't understand ki mujhe hi kyun suna rahe ho yeh sab when i didn't say any of this. when ur debating with me, u debate over stuff i posted and i will debate stuff over what u posted. that's how its done.

so in conclusion, DID Doubles did not do as well as DID 2 did in its intial 4 weeks. that was my point and that's the truth. what happens for the rest of season and what happened for the rest of the season in DID 2 is not the point.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Ankit

@ankit_nyc

Inactive

Posted: 14 years ago

#33

Originally posted by: Rapier

u compare things that are similar. it's a simple concept ankit.

and i guess its useless to tell u to stop misquoting people. u are saying the same thing over and over again, and i don't understand ki mujhe hi kyun suna rahe ho yeh sab when i didn't say any of this. when ur debating with me, u debate over stuff i posted and i will debate stuff over what u posted. that's how its done.

so in conclusion, DID Doubles did not do as well as DID 2 did in its intial 4 weeks. that was my point and that's the truth. what happens for the rest of season and what happened for the rest of the season in DID 2 is not the point.

😛 The truth if you really want to hear it is that Terrence and Remo's absence from DID has not hurt the DID brand in the slightest manner..........DID Doubles is pulling in the same high ratings that DID 2 pulled in...........😛 So at the end of the day, it really doesn't matter who the judges are as long as the contestants are good.........It's not as if Terrence took a bulk of the ratings from DID over to CDC....that show can't even do a 2 rating in its second season.......😛 The show is bigger then every single mentor, and all mentors can be replaced without the show suffering as this season of DID Doubles has proved already......😛

Quote

Prud123

@Prud123

Inactive

Posted: 14 years ago

#34

Hi Rapier

I will write what i have been writing in my other posts.Will try to be clearer.DID season2 did well the intial four weeks but then fell low to about trps of 2.Which means that it was initially doing well but later on was not doing as well.Now when comparing another show to this we cant compare the phase in which they were doing well only(also that phase was only 4 weeks) we need to compare over all.That is what i am saying an average of whole of did season 2 and then very week the average of did doubles should be compared to see how well is did doubles doing.If trps for did doubles goes down in the next weeks then avg will automatically become lower and then we can see who is doing better.And yes no one is accusing you of saying that ratings were 5 or 6 .In fact after reading your other posts i now think that you are one the members who watches the show for dance and not the mentors.Which is great.

Quote

1 2 3 4

Top ten shows 23/01 to 29/01 DID @10 - Page 4

Related Topics

Explore Topics