Top ten shows 23/01 to 29/01 DID @10 - Page 3

Originally posted by: Rapier

and ur point is? 3.87 is greater than 3.9? sure, if u say so.

i never said it is not doing well. maybe it is. just that its not doing as well as its previous seasons. that's about it! i did check ur post. u didn't provide TRPs in the same time range. i can't make any conclusions with that info.

Originally posted by: ankit_nyc

😕 Same range? ummmmm the average rating for the first 4 weeks of DID 2 was 3.34....and the average rating for DID Doubles for the first 4 weeks has been 3.33.........I hope that's clear enough for you...........😕 There were many claims made on the forum that DID 2 was averaging a 5-6 rating..........As you can clearly see this information was false and misleading.............It's also misleading to say that DID Doubles has suffered in ratings due to absence of Terrence and Remo.........😕 unless you think that a decrease of .1 percent in rating is suffering..........😊 DID 2 went down big time in ratings as the show progressed.......let's see what happens with DID Doubles as the weeks progress......😊

Originally posted by: Rapier

😃 So Terrence and Remo not being on the show has only cost Zee roughly a .8 or so decline in ratings..........😃 and here I thought people were saying Terrence and Remo made DID what it was...........losing .8 percent in rating doesn't mean a whole lot apparently as DID Doubles is still the most popular dance show on television and amongst the top 10 shows in the country.........😛 So much for the argument that Terrence and Remo were the life of DID............😛 their absence has resulted in a decline of .8 percent ratings..........😃

Originally posted by: Rapier

uhhh but according to Prud's info, it is 4.05.😕 and it wasn't me who made those claims of being in the 5-6 range. i'd appreciate it if u don't misquote me. thank u! and i cannot predict the future ankit ji. so arguing about the future of the show is useless.

Originally posted by: ankit_nyc

i do not appreciate u accusing me of saying stuff i did not. find me one post where I (only I, ankit. don't quote other people. what they post is none of my business) said remo and terence were the only reason DID ever did well and then i'll speak to u. jesus!

my point was DID Doubles is not doing as well as DID 2. i think i proved that and i think u guys proved it with ur info as well. so i don't see what's hard to accept.

Originally posted by: Rapier

😃 DID 2 season averaged a 3.34 rating and DID Doubles thus far is averaging a 3.33.......😛

Originally posted by: Prud123

Hi Rapier

Sorry but avg rating is not 4.05 just because in two weeks the ratings were above 4 doesnt make the avg ratings 4 .Average needs to be taken over a complete period of time.As i said in my earlier post may be i should calculate the average ratings for whole DID season 2 and then we can compare DID doubles avg every week to determine if its doing as well or not

Ankit

I completely agree with you that absence of terrence and remo has not affected DID.Their ratings are still strong.Like i have said before lets watch DID for the dances and not the mentors

Originally posted by: ankit_nyc

i hope ur not averaging the whole season of DID 2 cuz that would be unfair and that does not prove anything.

Originally posted by: Rapier

unfortunately we don't have all the TRP ratings for the rest of the season for doubles to make the comparison and i don't see why u can't just take the average of the first 4 weeks. the are both in the same time frame.