**Dhruv Tara - Samay Sadi Se Pare Episode Discussion Thread #5 ** - Page 88

Originally posted by: aekiel

Tara will never (knowingly) go against her father. Any gandharva vivah could happen accidentally before the announcement of the Tara-Senapati marriage, but never after the announcement- zero chance.

She's an ITV FL, and ITV FL's never go against their fathers 😛

They don't really need a secret/fake marriage though- showing that photo frame in the mandap will be enough to do the trick.

Always thought Senapati would benefit more from the reveal of the D-T marriage; he can then ask for part (or even the whole) kingdom in exchange for that marriage promise being broken.

Tara being Tara she will never go against her family at any cost 😔

Writers ko thoda balance rakhna chahiye tha directly indirectly Tara ki family ki wajah se Dhruv ka childhood ruined ho gaya papa ka pyar bhi nahi mila bechare ko

Tara ke chakkar me family aur career ko pichhe chhod diya usne aur ab bhaiji ke hatho marna bhi padega😭 aur kitna torture karoge ssp ab bas bhi karo😡

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CtnuONaIFMo/?igshid=YmM0MjE2YWMzOA==

Originally posted by: Utkarsha999

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CtnuONaIFMo/?igshid=YmM0MjE2YWMzOA==

Senapati be like..

Who speard kachara and waste papers on the Palace 😆

Originally posted by: MyDriYa

Senapati be like..

Who spread kachara and waste papers on the Palace 😆

Ab unhe kaun batae koi sapno mein unki na hone wali wife ke saath romantic dance kr raha ,wahi par saara pyaar kaagaz ban baarish kr raha h😃

Feel like DT union is impossible!

We fans simply love DT pair but if we see deeply to the story they are meant to be separated only like RadhaKrishna!

RK's love were eternal and beyond the time! Still ppl worship them! Can say, the only pair who were not meant to be together by fate but together by their heart!

Likewise here, Dhruv also being as Krishna..

1.Krishna was born as Devki Nandan but Yashoda maiya brought up him!

Dhruv also brought up by Shuseela but his biological mother is Taiji

2.Krishna goes to Kamsa and fight for his Mom-Dad and release them from Prison!

Dhruv also fought (verbal) with Maharaj and released Maharani ji(actually knowingly or unknowingly his Uncle also from the Prison who he consider as his own Father)

3.Krishna ji did all leela to save his devotees as we read.. He was an all-rounder at the time.. He makes impossible as possible..

Dhruv as a Doctor doing the same! From Saving lifesto to Creating new things like Krishna ji do!

4. Krishna does his Magic wherever he goes!

Dhruv also doing the same! Wherever he goes he does his work by his heart..

5.Even doing all leelas, Krishna left Radha because he knows he is born to do some great things especially Mahabharata

Dhruv also will soon understand, DT are meant to be separated like RK and he will go to 21st Century leaving Tara!

Maybe we will surprisingly get to see Rukmini's track(playing by Riya maybe) in 21st Century and Dhruv's love story once again 👍🏼 like Krishna's love story with 21st Century Tara 😳

400yrs back their love story wasn't possible and why not now on 21st century? DT can't break the timeline however by uniting..

It's all just my theory... It could be wrong too!

The idea of a rebirth for Tara in the 21st century, whilst probably a logical option, doesn't quite appeal to me as a viewer.

She won't quite be his Tara after all.

I personally don't mind Dhruv staying in the 17th century, potentially wiping his future self out of existence, and him staying alters the timeline and gives his uncle-father a fresh chance at life in the future- the U/F will be young again and there will no time-travelling folks to take him to the past.

That theory probably breaks several time-travel laws, but it's also something that Dhruv would do- stay in a time alien to his so that his u/f gets a fresh shot at life in the future again, and Susheela gets to spend the prime of her youth with her husband.

Originally posted by: aekiel

The idea of a rebirth for Tara in the 21st century, whilst probably a logical option, doesn't quite appeal to me as a viewer.

She won't quite be his Tara after all.

I personally don't mind Dhruv staying in the 17th century, potentially wiping his future self out of existence, and him staying alters the timeline and gives his uncle-father a fresh chance at life in the future- the U/F will be young again and there will no time-travelling folks to take him to the past.

That theory probably breaks several time-travel laws, but it's also something that Dhruv would do- stay in a time alien to his so that his u/f gets a fresh shot at life in the future again, and Susheela gets to spend the prime of her youth with her husband.

He will reach 21st century means 2023 right which is currently going on?

I mean Maharani told 19yrs back she went to future means probably Maharani reached there while 2004 right? Now how will F/U endup to 2004?

Well as per your theory if U/F reaches to 2004 and starts his life with Shuseela means, still Dhruv is already there as a Kid of Taiji n?

Originally posted by: MyDriYa

He will reach 21st century means 2023 right which is currently going on?

I mean Maharani told 19yrs back she went to future means probably Maharani reached there while 2004 right? Now how will F/U endup to 2004?

Well as per your theory if U/F reaches to 2004 and starts his life with Shuseela means, still Dhruv is already there as a Kid of Taiji n?

No, the older version of the uncle-father doesn't go back. He remains in Vallabhgarh as does Dhruv. The u/f dies in due course, but none of his actions have affected his own future self's birth.

Dhruv marries Tara and stays in 17th century. The earlier 21st century timeline is forgotten. In the newer 17th century timeline (which has D-T marriage and D staying in 17th), 400 years later, Ravi still gets married to Susheela. In this new timeline, Maharani doesn't go to Navrangvan or time travel. Neither does Tara, because Mahavir is already okay.

Ravi leads a normal life with Susheela. Nobody time travels or visits them from the 17th century.

Depending on what the time-travel laws are, maybe Dhruv gets born in the 21st century again; maybe he does not.

Originally posted by: aekiel

The idea of a rebirth for Tara in the 21st century, whilst probably a logical option, doesn't quite appeal to me as a viewer.

She won't quite be his Tara after all.

I personally don't mind Dhruv staying in the 17th century, potentially wiping his future self out of existence, and him staying alters the timeline and gives his uncle-father a fresh chance at life in the future- the U/F will be young again and there will no time-travelling folks to take him to the past.

That theory probably breaks several time-travel laws, but it's also something that Dhruv would do- stay in a time alien to his so that his u/f gets a fresh shot at life in the future again, and Susheela gets to spend the prime of her youth with her husband.

Even I don't want the rebirth of Tara in 21st century as you said she won't be the same Tara with whom Dhruv fell in love with. It's not like they both are taking rebirth and get united in the 21st century.

Originally posted by: aekiel

No, the older version of the uncle-father doesn't go back. He remains in Vallabhgarh as does Dhruv. The u/f dies in due course, but none of his actions have affected his own future self's birth.

Dhruv marries Tara and stays in 17th century. The earlier 21st century timeline is forgotten. In the newer 17th century timeline (which has D-T marriage and D staying in 17th), 400 years later, Ravi still gets married to Susheela. In this new timeline, Maharani doesn't go to Navrangvan or time travel. Neither does Tara, because Mahavir is already okay.

Ravi leads a normal life with Susheela. Nobody time travels or visits them from the 17th century.

Depending on what the time-travel laws are, maybe Dhruv gets born in the 21st century again; maybe he does not.

Do Dhruv agree stay in 17th century itself? Leaving his whole family? Forgetting them?