Originally posted by: universe_megha
Itz hard to believe that someone who pulled off romantic scenes cutely and innocently... without making the viewers feel awkward in anyway as Sanyogita in Dharti Ka Veer Yodha Prithviraj Chauhan was unable to do so in DharamVeer? i dont think that shera is like sanyogita and she has to do all the same like her Shera was introduced as a daku in the show but looking at the amount of fragility that has cropped up in the character (particularly in the way she walks) no dear its just that she is tired i wonder what the makers are trying to show. The number of touching scenes they are showing between Veer and Shera clearly reflects the way makers perceive romance. i think there is no harm in showing decent romance For them romance is only physical.. and they make sure that they show physical proximity b/w V-S at all possible places? moke ka fayida kyun na uttaya jaey sometimes even creating situations for it.. like making Shera fall again and again.. and Veer supporting her. ok they are trying to make romantic scenes but i dont think that they showed any vulgarity And then they claim DharamVeer?s target audience to be teens and kids. aajkal bache kya nahin dekhte..
What the makers don?t realize is that they are validating such objectionable stuff among teens and are in a way encouraging such behaviour. no dear its not objectionable What do the makers want the viewers to interpret out of the ?bonfire scene? between V-S? it was very cold and there was a demand of such scene Do they want us to term such physical closeness among teens as correct? a friend was helping his friend and ya he touched her shoulders and they were covered with shawl i cant understand where was the vulgarity Didn?t the on-screen ages of Veer and Shera (between 15 and 17) come to their mind even once while shooting that sequence? i think you are not living in this world many of the students starts romancing in just fifth class and they r big enough and as said b4 in 13th century they were getted married in these ages and ya it happens now also in some places Or worse, they preferred to ignore it.. or worst, they preferred to cash in on it.. aajkal yahi bikta hai? TRPs and popularity at the cost of corrupting young and impressionable minds!! đđź do not agree they have alot good stuff
No matter how open and broadminded our society becomes there is a limit to what teens should know and what they should see.This is important for their physical and mental well being as well as healthy psychological development. they know more then usđ The makers are forgetting that they have a history of making good mythological and historical shows and so have an implied social responsibility to show stuff that is not objectionable. Once in a while a romantic scene, if shown in a healthy manner, is refreshing.. but frequent touching and such closeness among teens is definitely not healthy. dont think that they are crossing their limits and it will harm teens mentality
And if their inspiration is drawn from shows like Dil Mil Gaye and Kayamath then I must remind them arrey woh iss se inspire hoon ge that in these shows actors as well as characters are ?adults?. In DV, the lead actor (Rajat) is a minor and the characters Veer and Shera are minors too. characters are not minor
It was such an embarrassment for me to be seeing that scene (jo kuch zyada hi ho gayaa tha) along with my mom woh tu hum log v-s ke sharmahat dekh k sharmaane lagte hain u cant say it embarrasment I myself, don?t think high of such a scene? and if makers keep showing such stuff.. then they would truly be insensitive?
PS: I sincerely request the makers not to show such seemingly ?cute? bonfire scenes or the like anymore and even reduce the number of touching scenes between Veer and Shera. touching scenes can b little less but romance shud continue
Anupamaa
