Therz thin line difference b/w romance - Page 2

Megha dear....i dont agree wid u in this.....i watch DV wid my parents n nt at one single moment i found it vulgar or thought of changing the channel.............. all the scenes were cute n both RT-MC acted vry sweetly widout brking that thin line........

btu which vulgar scene came how did i miss it, mujhe to koi vulgar scene dekhai hi nahin dera raha

Megha...I don't know what to say!! Its of course your opinion and I can see that nuff been said abt the stone aged romance. I would rather look at this century and to me vulgarity at this age means soooooo much more that it is even impossible to compare it with romance. I don't think its ok to look at physical contacts as just 'touch' - it can carry so much more meaning when you look at the moments before and after that touch. Was it accidental or incidental? or was it portrayed as intentional? and after that 'touch', was there a loving apology in their eyes or desire to take this further??? I don't think Veer or Shera, in their acts portrayed anything that would encourage any teens to extremism of romance or vulgarity. In fact teens should appreciate that how much an eye contact can say much more than words or any physical moves. Just my opinion 😊 No hard feelings!!

-Neeli

Originally posted by: neelresh

Megha...I don't know what to say!! Its of course your opinion and I can see that nuff been said abt the stone aged romance. I would rather look at this century and to me vulgarity at this age means soooooo much more that it is even impossible to compare it with romance. I don't think its ok to look at physical contacts as just 'touch' - it can carry so much more meaning when you look at the moments before and after that touch. Was it accidental or incidental? or was it portrayed as intentional? and after that 'touch', was there a loving apology in their eyes or desire to take this further??? I don't think Veer or Shera, in their acts portrayed anything that would encourage any teens to extremism of romance or vulgarity. In fact teens should appreciate that how much an eye contact can say much more than words or any physical moves. Just my opinion 😊 No hard feelings!!

-Neeli

awwwww Jaaaan !! i m speechless !!! 👏👏👏

Originally posted by: sarajee123

awwwww Jaaaan !! i m speechless !!! 👏👏👏

Rajat and Mughda are Friends they've worked with each other before and Im sure that their minds arent in the gutter when they act a romantic scene together😳
As for calling their scenes vulgar well....
Vulgar would have been inappropriate touching, kissing, and pretty much acting in a way that was completely disgusting and shameless.

There is nothing like that in any of their scenes together
In fact the affection shown between them in their scenes is more than some teenage crush/puppy love its actually quite mature and I think the love is shown more in the non physical aspects of the scenes like the eye contact and the smiles.


Rajat and Mughda are close friends who have worked together before and its this affecton that comes across on screen.

Of course you are entitled to your opinion.
And DharamVeer is nothing like Dill Mill Gaye.
Rajat has never acted a scene the way Karan does.

Aisha xxx😊

Itz hard to believe that someone who pulled off romantic scenes cutely and innocently... without making the viewers feel awkward in anyway as Sanyogita in Dharti Ka Veer Yodha Prithviraj Chauhan was unable to do so in DharamVeer' Shera was introduced as a daku in the show but looking at the amount of fragility that has cropped up in the character (particularly in the way she walks) i wonder what the makers are trying to show. The number of touching scenes they are showing between Veer and Shera clearly reflects the way makers perceive romance. For them romance is only physical.. and they make sure that they show physical proximity b/w V-S at all possible places' sometimes even creating situations for it.. like making Shera fall again and again.. and Veer supporting her. And then they claim DharamVeer's target audience to be teens and kids.

What the makers don't realize is that they are validating such objectionable stuff among teens and are in a way encouraging such behaviour. What do the makers want the viewers to interpret out of the 'bonfire scene' between V-S? Do they want us to term such physical closeness among teens as correct? Didn't the on-screen ages of Veer and Shera (between 15 and 17) come to their mind even once while shooting that sequence? Or worse, they preferred to ignore it.. or worst, they preferred to cash in on it.. aajkal yahi bikta hai? TRPs and popularity at the cost of corrupting young and impressionable minds!! 👎🏼

No matter how open and broadminded our society becomes there is a limit to what teens should know and what they should see. This is important for their physical and mental well being as well as healthy psychological development. The makers are forgetting that they have a history of making good mythological and historical shows and so have an implied social responsibility to show stuff that is not objectionable. Once in a while a romantic scene, if shown in a healthy manner, is refreshing.. but frequent touching and such closeness among teens is definitely not healthy.

VERY TRUE ,here vulgarity line is being touched even sometimes crossed!

And if their inspiration is drawn from shows like Dil Mil Gaye and Kayamath then I must remind them that in these shows actors as well as characters are 'adults'. In DV, the lead actor (Rajat) is a minor and the characters Veer and Shera are minors too.

It was such an embarrassment for me to be seeing that scene (jo kuch zyada hi ho gayaa tha) along with my mom. I myself, don't think high of such a scene' and if makers keep showing such stuff.. then they would truly be insensitive'

PS: I sincerely request the makers not to show such seemingly 'cute' bonfire scenes or the like anymore and even reduce the number of touching scenes between Veer and Shera.

Originally posted by: pearly rajat

megha yes i agree that there is a very thin line diff bw romance and vulgarity.but darling 13 century was a time when ppl got married at this age. and about the physical contact btw veer and shera then darling what makes their romance standout is the kind of shyness and discomfort that they themselves feel while doing all this. prithvi sanyo record 10 hugs yet beautiful yet enchanting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! aur bonfire tou sirf aik impact create karne k liye.and then their characters . shera a dakoo doesnt know much about being girlish and all and veer tasahan mein rehne wala cheetah . in saare scenes ko rewind kar k dekho tou doono ki aankhon mein respect nazar aye gi na k vulgarity. they touch and realize that no............... yeh kya horaha hai!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i salute rajat and mug and again rajat that they while doing these scenes made me believe that true love can exist in this age also. aur jahan tak aaj k teeanagers ki baat hai tou har kisi ka perspective 'alag hota hai. kuch tou burai mein bhi acchai dekhte hain aur kuch acchai mein bhi burai

p.s : i respect ur opinion and i hope that u will respect mine

Megha they why are you looking at them as lovers they are friends as well and as far as I know that friends of all age hug and in that scene that hug was totally a friend supporting the other in the time of distress there wasn no other thougth in their mind accept well bring of Dharam and there was no reason to think that it was anyway vulgar.