Sita is already gone - Page 2

Originally posted by: Dimple_

But when Sati time traveled into the future wouldn't Parvati already be born. ...I thougth it would be the same thing...?

Surya that is dumb Sati dies only than can she be born as Parvati. Gods can time travel. It was probably dumb of the CV's to show Ram and Sita in Sati phase.

I guess Cvs are really trying to make us hell lot curious

Though I have to say it would be cool if Sati met Parvati😆

Yes I remember Debo though not active on the forum at that time I understand that track was crucial because Sati lost her Vamaangi adhikar. At that time I did not like it so much because I felt it was not needed.
Guys don't be confused now will be the real story of Ramayan first Dashanan will become Raavan which lead to Ramayan.

Originally posted by: deboleena.manna

guys they showed that when Sati asked Mahadev k woh kiska dhyan karte hai to Mahadev ne Sri Ram k bare main bataya..she didn't blv that it is Narayan so she want to test him...n that y she went to that era by time traveling n took Mata Sita's disguise but Narayan recognize her...Mahadev also appear there n they bless the Shivling made by Sri Ram...that Shivling is know as Sri Rameswar Jotyirling...this story is taken from Shiv Puran..n bcz of this Devi Sati loose her right to sit on Mahadev's left side as his wife...when they showed this we had a good discussion on this...for more info check the thread "Doubts & Discussion on Lord Shiva 1"...but yes that Tulsi story told by Prasuti was a blooper..

Originally posted by: Ranjusha

They shld not have shown Ram during Sati at all it is very strange.

Actually the scene based on Sati and ram is based on Ramayan scripture. i believe i maybe wrong.