Tripur so soon???

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Kal El

@Kal El

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#41

Seriously? Karanvir as Mahisha? 😆

Originally posted by: .Vrish.
Timelines - the CVs have no idea what happened when. Durga was first created for Mahishashur, w/ the various deities (not Parvati) invoking her, giving her their shaktis and astra-shastras. The story of Shumbha happened later, when Durga was a part of Parvati. Oh, and one more thing - Kartikeya was one of those who gave Durga his shaktis in both stories, but as per this serial, he's not born as yet.

On the contrary I think they do know what happened when. Clearly they are deliberately making changes because they feel it's better that way, to spice up the storylines, add more asurs to Taraka's story to make it cooler and so on. Although why they didn't use the South Indian version I don't know; because that one has a zillion asurs already in the story. 😆

Edited by Kal El - 12 years ago

Quote

Vrish

@Vr15h

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 12 years ago

#42

But that they'd have had to have started from day 1. They can't introduce Tarakasura as the ruler of the asuras, and then suddenly, one fine day, introduce Surapadman and Simhamukha. It just wouldn't have made sense.

But I do hope that after Kartikeya slays Taki, he marries Devasena.

If they wanted to spice up the story, showing Shumbha & Nishumbha reforming makes little sense. Reminds me of the ASR track where Kumbhakarna fell asleep in the battlefield, and a number of rakshashas were sent to wake him up, and finally, Indrajeet managed it.

Karanveer as Mahishashur - just my brainwave, Kal. I doubt it will happen, though.

Edited by .Vrish. - 12 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Kal El

@Kal El

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#43

Originally posted by: .Vrish.
But that they'd have had to have started from day 1. They can't introduce Tarakasura as the ruler of the asuras, and then suddenly, one fine day, introduce Surapadman and Simhamukha. It just wouldn't have made sense.[/quote]

That's what I meant. They should have gone with that version from the beginning. You have a lot of asurs there in the story already. There would have been no need to create brand new ones or drag Vritra and others into the story.

Quote

Khushi Grover

@Amor.

Stunner

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#44

just read ur discussion guyz
well i dnt hv any idea abt tripur but after reading i totally support u all n yes i read the durga puran n m very much disappointed with the mahaepi thy showed which just distorted the story...

one more thing which is irritating is devi parwati despite of being a part of aadi shakti was shown confused, she dnt know anything crying n sobbing like a normal women :/ her mother maina wati always jump to rescue her comforts on kailash... i mean wat is gong on CVs hv to wake up i noe the show is abt mahadev but that doesn't mean that aadi shakti dnt noe anything n she alwayz need mahadev's brains to think wat is right or wrong...

they are just spoiling a gud show day by day

Edited by BhartiKhushi909 - 12 years ago