\|/Doubts & Discussions about Lord Shiva Part-1\|/ - Page 48

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

183.6k

Users

111

Likes

2.2k

Frequent Posters

Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: shruti.nil

@Vrish and Varaali-i guess they are trying to use known asurs rather than unknown self created ones,since people know those asurs existed,they needed villains so they have changed the time frame!its bit strange but thats how the cvs though...


That'd be like having a serial where Rama & Krishna are both living at the same time, and Rama, Lakshman, Shatrughan, Krishna, Yudhisthir & others have discussions on how to defeat an alliance of Ravan & Duryodhan, which has Bheeshma, Drona etc defending Lanka as a part of this deal.

Really strange!
varaali thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
^^^^ Are the creative heads of DkDM trying to out do the creatives of DBSK? 😆
kkr531 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago

The Show has gone very far from the mythology its not even 20 percent accurate with respect to
the original shiva and sati story.

However as long as they convey the given message it should be fine, but i too feel they are taking too much liberty in this respect.

for example sati never in her whole life even thought for a second about marrying some body else
let alone consider it. That point is really hurting me very hard as both mata parvati and lord shiva are my favorite gods in Hindu pantheon.

For the record Vritasura according to puranas is born from yagnya fire to defeat Indra by Tva??? descendent of bhrigu in order to avenge his son visvaroopa's death. He is killed by Indra using vajrayudha which is made from spine of rishi dadhichi.

Regards
Krishna
Sia889 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: kkr531


The Show has gone very far from the mythology its not even 20 percent accurate with respect to
the original shiva and sati story.

However as long as they convey the given message it should be fine, but i too feel they are taking too much liberty in this respect.

for example sati never in her whole life even thought for a second about marrying some body else
let alone consider it. That point is really hurting me very hard as both mata parvati and lord shiva are my favorite gods in Hindu pantheon.

For the record Vritasura according to puranas is born from yagnya fire to defeat Indra by Tva??? descendent of bhrigu in order to avenge his son visvaroopa's death. He is killed by Indra using vajrayudha which is made from spine of rishi dadhichi.

Regards
Krishna



Completely agree wid u Krishna..i mean tey r taking it too far..adding alll modern stuff like going on a date before marriage and that Vritraasur's soul taking over Satbheesh's with those shining eyes n stuff it reminds me of this horror show Aahat!
what r they trying to do yaar..come on its high time they should come on track n move the show fwd with more sensible n digestible facts abt Shiv n Sati


Regards

Sia

Edited by Killer_Shark - 13 years ago
qwertyu thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: mnx12

On a lighter note marriags are made in Heaven & broken on Earth😆

Now a serious thought-
Marriage is a partnership a life partnership, where 2 people who are destined to be with each other meet, are united with Marriage rituals. Every individual is born with certain amount of karmas which we call destiny. He/she enjoys, suffers due to those Karmas.
Destiny is divided into 3 types 1) 100% unchangable, that generally forms 40% of our destiny, which is actually the result of our previous birth's karmas, good, bad excellent or worst.
2) 60-40 , ie 60% unchangable, same as 1st, but remaining 40% can be changed. These are the cases where an event will happen, but we can change the result with our hard work or efforts. If one doesn't put any effort to improve here, then it gives same result as 1st one. 2nd type of destiny is same as this. This is our remaining 30% destiny.
3) For balance 30%, God gives us freedom to do whatever we want. Here we perform karmas which will give result in this birth & can be carried foreword to the next birth too. This part of the destiny, we creat with our own free will, or are forced to do something unwillingly, our thought pattern plays a mojore role in whatever we do. Here our 'Sanskar", efforts & the circumstances makes or ruins our destiny.
Marriage an important part of our life is decided by these 3 types. 2 people gets married because of their unchangable destiny. What they do to make or break this relation that is decided by above 3 types. If they have unchangable destiny to live together forever, then no one can seperate them, this bond they have earned due to their past good deeds. If their marriage falls in the 2nd type then with some effort their relation will survive with adjustments. But if they are not ready to adjust or put an effort then marriage doesn't survive. if their marrige is destined to be of 3rd type then they are only responsible for making or breaking their relation.
The soulmate concept exists, very lucky people gets their soulmate as their life partner.


Thank you Meenakshi! You have answered a very difficult question very clearly :) If possible can you also tell me the source for this? Is it some sacred granth or something?
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
Thank you Meenakshi! You have answered a very difficult question very clearly :) If possible can you also tell me the source for this? Is it some sacred granth or something?
This is all based on my study of Astrology & interest in finding out about Karmas. Can not name any particular book, it's saar of many books & personal observation purly from academic interest.
kkr531 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
just now saw


the precap


satbish ( or vritasur what ever crap)

is able to touch sati this is absolutely ( what can i say)

i mean how can person other than shiv who touches maaa aadishakti he will surely

burn down to ashes

show is becoming more and more ( i have no words to say)



regards
Krishna

-Nymphadora- thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 13 years ago
@Vrish and Krishna...i agree...i like the show every much,but i do think in terms of the story they are taking "creativity" way too seriously...
for starters Satbhish had no connection with Sati what so ever-yes as per the swayamvar track she did have some suitors but none of them are mentioned...
about Tarkasur and Vritrasur they may have even existsed at that point of time-however by getting Takasur his boon now-of being killed by Shivas son,rather than during Pravatis time has distorted the story completely..beacuse Tarkasur is supposed to be one of the main reason for Pravati and Shiva union,not Satis...
also Satbhish with glowering red eyes..seriously?..is he possessed by Ra.One or by an asur...
they do show a disclaimer before the show-that this is "inspired" from the scriptures and is meant for entertainment purposes only..but its high time they come on track!
shruti
-Nymphadora- thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 13 years ago
now my doubt...😆...
what does the word OM mean?why is it associated with Shiva?,and why do most of the mantras like the Gayatri Mantra start with an OM?
please reply
thanks in advance
shruti
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
A humble request to all, let this thread be only about discussions of Lord Shiva & Devi Shakti connected matters. Your grievences about the show should be posted in WU or other threads. Let this thread have divine feelings only like I've said earlier.😆

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".