Originally posted by: chatbuster
sure about that? dont camels do the equilavent thing of stocking up?😉
now even taking your example, why is going hunting after other animals even if u are hungry a decidedly "right" thing to do? isnt that also a matter of perspective? one animal's meat is another animal's hide😉
Could be because Domino's Pizza doesn't deliver there?😊 Now I don't think you want me to go into the obvious and discuss animal life, but I am sensing you are debating for the heck of it or fun of it maybe.😛
Although we think of ourselves to be center of the universe and judge with our limited capability , our logic pales when compared to laws of nature.
Simply put death is absolute universal truth to all living things and right to life is a moral construct for human beings. Right to life supersedes all other rights in our moral and legal systems... but not always as it is evident in war times, decision to kill fetus when mothers life is threatened or in self defense - so killing to us can be both wrong and right not because of relativism but due to laws of nature..when armed with morals we get confused with the duality when the focus must be from nature's point of view- on feeding not on killing .. this was my point about animals not hunting as a hobby but to feed themselves..Rights and duties are not one and the same. one doesn't necessarily have right to live (as is evident by one's station in food chain) but one has duty/dharma to live as long as they can. This is inherent in our DNA and we don't have to think if and when it is right or wrong.. I feel one will end up doing the right thing if one follows duty then when the action is to fulfill one's own rights or whims..