Originally posted by: SholaJoBhadkey
I don't agree with that. The same principle of immunity gets applied there too. I remember when I was teaching at a school, there was this first-grader who had made life hell for his teacher and other kids. Never listened to anyone. He even used to hit the teacher and the kids. One day, during recess he was asked by me to pick up his rubbish and put it in the bin. He refused. I asked him a second time, and he refused. I asked him a third time and he spat on me. All I could think of at that moment was a smack! He didn't cry, he did what he was told and behaved after that. If I hadn't smacked him that day, the other students would have got the impression that it was ok to disobey.
Spoilt lil kiddy SJB - sometimes it does take a smack. Wouldn't fly in the US, but never stopped the teachers in India from whacking us on the knuckles (especially the nuns!!!) or having us kneel on the concrete halls (much worse for a girl )
Hello DewDrop! ๐ I can appreciate the concept of punishment by taking away priviliges or favorite things, or giving incentives for good behavior. I just haven't seen it work out particularly well in practice.
I do think part of that has to do with the environment and community we grow up in. Having seen both worlds and experienced more of the one with physical punishments, I'd have to say it worked for me.
I've turned out to be a pretty good kid, and I don't say that to boast but to provide a live example. My sister and have often been praised by family and friends for our good behavior, being well-mannered, etc. This usually comes from parents who practice the "time-out" and "grounding" route, and don't scold, let alone hit their kids.
This again, comes from a person who's grown up first in a military world where it was physical punsihment for most infractions. Neighborhood me sab bachchon ko daat toh padhti hi thi, saath me do-chaar thappad bhi milte the.
I then grew up in America where my parents still followed the Indian practice of smacking the kid to teach a point. This, while I lived my American aunt and saw her counting to three 5-6 times a day. Eventually she got fed-up of all the back-talk her daughter gave her (4 yrs old) and resorted to the occasional smack. I don't know if that's why her kid is a pretty well behaved girl now, or if something else influenced along the way. I can only guess based on what I saw.
True people do end up accepting a beating as routine. There was a point where I would hear the beginnings of a lecture and expect the slap. You start to expect and prepare yourself for it. The tears stop and you learn to keep up a stoic face. Doesn't mean the slap stings any less or the lesson loses its significance. I think the acceptance and expectation is a mechanism of self-defense, at least mentally.
Before I start sounding like some physically abusive, sadistic lunatic, let me make it clear that I only approve of corporeal punishment within appropriate limits. It's not a method to be implimented on a daily basis at every given opportunity. It also shouldn't be taken to extreme levels. A smacking or spanking is fine. But beyond that, when excessive physical force is used, it's just plain abuse.
Your last sentence actually made me pause the most... for a society that relies heavily on physical punishment to discipline it's children, I have to say, Indians aren't the most agressive of people in nature. Our history and our present global position are proofs enough. For some reason I've never equated the Indian population with agression. But yours is an interesting point with potential truth to it.