Falling in love with more than one person - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

149

Views

10.9k

Users

45

Frequent Posters

Pradarshak thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#41

In the movie the lady lives with the pain of her secret love affair(4 days) for the rest of her life. The four day love affair she wrote down in a three volume diary. I am not saying she did wrong by falling in love, but she was wrong in not committing to it. It's not that she could forget it as time passed. In a way she cheated her spouse as all the time she was living with secret romance memories. If I am not wrong, the message of the movie was one should do whatever is necessary to find happiness in life.

Edited by Pradarshak - 18 years ago
Groovychick thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#42

Originally posted by: s.priya

Why not... Love is like any other emotion, which can happen at any time. Love need not be physical either. So it is very much possible for a person who is well and happily married and in love with her spouse to also like and love another person.

How one handles such an emotion is what then decides the future course of their lives and their desiny.

I also believe that if a person indulges in extra marital affairs, there is nothing taboo about it either. After all, it is only an emotion and nothing more than that. Emotional attachments and dalliances often lead u to trouble. If u r emotionally very stable and your affairs do not cloud up your mind and heart, then there is no problem at all.

Priyaji, if you are happily married..how can you see another women from that angle..i find it quite sick actually..!
I believe if you do have a wife/husband and love them with your full heart then any other person that you claim to love..i think its not love..but its lust..just an obsession..

I am strongly against such affairs..if what you are saying is right then you can have one wife and love thirty four other people😕lol..ofcourse not every pati is the seedha-sadha type saying that they won't ever even set their eye on a woman but if you knew you weren't in love or were never going to fall in love with your wife..then why marry them anyway?! This is a kinda playboy situation..

btw..attraction is not necessarily a sign of love..im attratced towards eijaz khan..but I most cvertainly do not look at him in that way..

Tina xx

Edited by Groovychick - 18 years ago
lighthouse thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#43
I was talking more about emotional and mental love rather then physical. In the movie Bridges of MC , being a hollywood movie(or even in Bollywood movie KANK for that matter) they carried the affair to the physical level which violates marital and spousal relationship, definitely a no no.

On a lighter note, I heard someone say that if you are in love , you love 2 people. Ourselves and the lover.!!!!
193980 thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#44
Love is just an emotion. It is not necessary be physical. I believe that it is possible to fall in love with more than one person even for the happily married ones. Sometimes one gets attracted to a trait ones' spouse doesn't possess. That is love too. When that attraction crosses the boundaries of a committed relationship the love and trust which was there in the previous relationship ceases to exist.
chatbuster thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#45
haha, if we're dreaming about the make-believe filmi world of old-world love, then i suppose it's not possible to love another. juliet can kill herself but her quota of one romeo is all she'll ever have; Nargis will shoot herself before anyone other than Raj will ever touch her; Meena can be a woman scorned but she'll never stop loving Raj saat-janamon tak. 😆

but if we step out of this celluloid reel world and get real, then i think anything goes. the essence of romantic love, which i think is what we are talking about here, is to my mind emotional and physical desires. yeh kambhakhat dil kab phisal jaata hai, pata hee naheen chalta hai- these spicy events might come unheeded and unwanted, but dont these possibilities make life exciting? dont they send the heart beating faster, the pulse racing again? if it's taboo, if it's dangerous, if it is hidden, it is all the more passionate. 😉

we may start out with these feelings for a spouse, but over time the relationship usually goes downhill romantically. the guy inevitably develops an ungainly paunch. it's the outcome of those years of being a monday morning quarterback. instead of a charming "honey, where are we going for dinner?", it becomes a snarling "where's my dinner?". romantic love goes out the window. the candlelits turn fluoroscent. our emotional and physical needs go unfulfilled. it is then not just possible but probable that we would transfer our affections elsewhere. that's just our self-preservation tendency. after all, who doesn't want to feel desired/ wanted. it's a sin only if we actively seek out these thrills. but if it was all as uncontrollable as those nervous tics, then who are we to judge? 😆
Edited by chatbuster - 18 years ago
Prenz~13 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#46
the meaning of lov has changed over the years...
about 50 years ago, a husband and wife were eternally committed to each other, but if you look at the scenario today,its completely different...
love isnt based on looks anymore, love is more about emotional stability..trust and compassion..
if a woman finds all this in a man, she falls in love with him, and its the same for a man.
but people change...if a woman has an unhappy life after marraige, and she finds support from sumone else,then she falls in love with that someone else...sort of like wat happened in KANK
i feel if the both the girl and boy,remain the same people they were before marraige,then theres no need to stray..maybe you feel attraction for a person, but that all it is...attraction..
chatbuster thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#47

Originally posted by: coolgirl_13

the meaning of lov has changed over the years...
about 50 years ago, a husband and wife were eternally committed to each other, but if you look at the scenario today,its completely different...
love isnt based on looks anymore, love is more about emotional stability..trust and compassion..
if a woman finds all this in a man, she falls in love with him, and its the same for a man.
but people change...if a woman has an unhappy life after marraige, and she finds support from sumone else,then she falls in love with that someone else...sort of like wat happened in KANK
i feel if the both the girl and boy,remain the same people they were before marraige,then theres no need to stray..maybe you feel attraction for a person, but that all it is...attraction..

haha, not based on looks? all else equal, it sure is easier to love someone who looks good, no?😉😆

if anything, the reverse is true these days. like in the west, we increasingly "fall in love" before marriage and then it's mostly based on physical attraction. was different in older times with arranged marriages where one was expected to find love over time- a lot of factors other than looks alone then entered into it. my POV

Edited by chatbuster - 18 years ago
mermaid_QT thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#48
The first time you fall in love and committ yourself ( i am obviously not talking about childhood crushes, infatuations and attractions, talking about true love), it is your heart that takes over. The one and only thought running your brain is "i cannot live without him or her.. can;t wait to spend the rest of my life together"
As time goes on and you wake up next to the same person, for months... love stays and even grows stronger, more confortable.. but it does become a bit routine. "Taking for granted" may also happen to some people. Proximity also breeds friction and hence it requires character and maturity to figure out whether this FALLING IN & OUT of love.. and falling back in is any worthwhile.
For most, I hope the answer is YES.. but for some unfortunate ones, the falling in and out becomes rather meaningless and unnecessary. If these people meet other people who SEEM perfect, ofcourse, they may FALL in love again, with these others.. This love can grow in leaps and bounds and just as Priya and Rumi rightly said, it can be looked at as a source of neverending fresh spring water.. Nothing wrong in wanting to quench thrist with it..while not crossing limits.
Who decided limits? Yes, society /family- oriented RESPONSIBILITIES. Both emotional and physical intimacy can be deletorious for a marriage. What a matured and happily married person in a NORMAL HEALTHY marriage realizes is that the water that is SPRING WATER for me, might be just not very convenient to someone living in the hills. The local in hills perhaps dreams of getting a TAP fixed in her hut, so that she doesn;t have to walk all the way to the source.

According to me, nothing is black / white. No one is perfect. The other man / woman may SEEM perfect because you don;t wake up next to them EVERYDAY! Their wife / husband may actually tell you what THEY are really like 😆
It is ofcourse NOT A SIN according to me to love more than one person, but the flavor of that love is / must be different. If one feels that there is only ONE they want to go back home to every night.. I think they have a good marriage. All couples have disagreements and the relationship does take a toll every once in a while, but its okay. Yes you may not be head over heals about your spouse after 5 years of marriage, but that is okay too..
It is the art of falling BACK in love is what marriage is about.. Faling in love is easy thing to do!

According to me, crossing boundaries, disregarding responsibilities (especially if children are involved) is a strict no no.. but one can love many at a time. Not a Sin. naah aah..

This is a great thread, thanks everyone.

mQT
Pradarshak thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#49

Originally posted by: chatbuster

haha, if we're dreaming about the make-believe filmi world of old-world love, then i suppose it's not possible to love another. juliet can kill herself but her quota of one romeo is all she'll ever have; Nargis will shoot herself before anyone other than Raj will ever touch her; Meena can be a woman scorned but she'll never stop loving Raj saat-janamon tak. 😆

but if we step out of this celluloid reel world and get real, then i think anything goes. the essence of romantic love, which i think is what we are talking about here, is to my mind emotional and physical desires. yeh kambhakhat dil kab phisal jaata hai, pata hee naheen chalta hai- these spicy events might come unheeded and unwanted, but dont these possibilities make life exciting? dont they send the heart beating faster, the pulse racing again? if it's taboo, if it's dangerous, if it is hidden, it is all the more passionate. 😉

we may start out with these feelings for a spouse, but over time the relationship usually goes downhill romantically. the guy inevitably develops an ungainly paunch. it's the outcome of those years of being a monday morning quarterback. instead of a charming "honey, where are we going for dinner?", it becomes a snarling "where's my dinner?". romantic love goes out the window. the candlelits turn fluoroscent. our emotional and physical needs go unfulfilled. it is then not just possible but probable that we would transfer our affections elsewhere. that's just our self-preservation tendency. after all, who doesn't want to feel desired/ wanted. it's a sin only if we actively seek out these thrills. but if it was all as uncontrollable as those nervous tics, then who are we to judge? 😆

Aap ki baat sahi hain. We are human beings after all, hum phisaltey hain. From what you say is life becomes boring when there is lesser room for romance, we tend to seek another way. Tab ghar ki murgi bhi daal barabar lagta hain. Here the topic is "a person can love two person simultaneously". Do you think that actually can happen? That means without caring for the one at home, taking him/her for granted - and still call it love. I differ, that's just a way to get the approval from others and own conscience by pretending to be morally correct.

Edited by Pradarshak - 18 years ago
lighthouse thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#50

Originally posted by: coolgirl_13

the meaning of lov has changed over the years...
about 50 years ago, a husband and wife were eternally committed to each other, but if you look at the scenario today,its completely different...
love isnt based on looks anymore, love is more about emotional stability..trust and compassion..

You are so right about the difference in marraiges today then say Laila/Majnu time. They didn't have Movies/TV, Internet or professional interests or hobbies. What if the person you are married to does not share some of the same interests in an otherwise happy marriage. Because of our protruding interests in lots of areas it may be possible to develop affinity with more then one person.

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".