Tired of debating? Have a break... have a Chit Chat - Page 31

Originally posted by: K.Universe.

Good. With the obvious out of the way, let's revisit the first post.

The fat brown buffalo runs over the forest so no forest remains. The fat brown buffalo having run over the forest, leaves the scene, so no fat brown buffalo remains. Even if there were witnesses to the fat brown buffalo running over the forest, they will be eliminated so no witnesses remain.

Your metaphysical question once again proves that all unobserved events are identical to events that didn't occur at all.

But the event was observed by two people, and one fat brown buffalo. One of them, like you said, has conveniently died, the other is missing, and then there's the fat brown buffalo who was not only the witness, but the one that made the forest disappear.

So my question is, when will this cosmic immbalance be rectified, if it ever will, and why should the fat brown buffalo get fatter and fatter by the day.

Originally posted by: charminggenie

You just insulted a Buffalo there.

Germany attack was well thought-out and directly related with ISIS. It's interesting to see how ISIS takes ownership of different attacks in different ways speaks a lot about their strategy. German guy had filmed a video, ISIS affiliated channel uploaded and was cheering up all the way through. Whereas for Nice, where there were substantial Muslim losses too , they kept quiet and some Pro-channels did the propaganda. It has a deep relationship with the whole image perception.

I like Merkel, but I do think there is no way Europe can turn down refugees or filter them out. There is no political way out.

But why not? if Europe just said, we're not taking anymore, what are they going to do about it?

Originally posted by: Heisenberg17.

But the event was observed by two people, and one fat brown buffalo. One of them, like you said, has conveniently died, the other is missing, and then there's the fat brown buffalo who was not only the witness, but the one that made the forest disappear.

So my question is, when will this cosmic immbalance be rectified, if it ever will, and why should the fat brown buffalo get fatter and fatter by the day.

Great question(s)

Sadly, in the cosmic arena, observation and truth need not necessarily have a convergence. If they did, the cosmos wouldn't probably exist. My reality is my observation. That doesn't mean my reality is the truth.

If you are not conscious that the fat brown buffalo is getting fatter and fatter by the day, the fat brown buffalo wouldn't get fatter and fatter by the day. Think about it.

Originally posted by: K.Universe.

Great question(s)

Sadly, in the cosmic arena, observation and truth need not necessarily have a convergence. If they did, the cosmos wouldn't probably exist. My reality is my observation. That doesn't mean my reality is the truth.

If you are not conscious that the fat brown buffalo is getting fatter and fatter by the day, the fat brown buffalo wouldn't get fatter and fatter by the day. Think about it.

Then why is it that everytime that I look at the fat brown buffalo, he remains fat, brown, and a buffalo. The browness and buffaloness are constant, well maybe a different shade of brown depending on the season, but it's never black, white, or purple. And buffaloness is an immutable, it tries to be a human but fails. As for the volume of space that it occupies, that fluctuates, but in recent times, it's been increasing exponentially.

So why is it, whenever I observe the fat brown buffalo, it's always the same fat brown buffalo, and it's always a fat brown buffalo? Surely if I'm not observing it, it still remains a fat brown buffalo, not a skinny white buffalo.

Originally posted by: Heisenberg17.

Then why is it that everytime that I look at the fat brown buffalo, he remains fat, brown, and a buffalo. The browness and buffaloness are constant, well maybe a different shade of brown depending on the season, but it's never black, white, or purple. And buffaloness is an immutable, it tries to be a human but fails. As for the volume of space that it occupies, that fluctuates, but in recent times, it's been increasing exponentially.

So why is it, whenever I observe the fat brown buffalo, it's always the same fat brown buffalo, and it's always a fat brown buffalo? Surely if I'm not observing it, it still remains a fat brown buffalo, not a skinny white buffalo.

Not to get cheesy and not to "lift" from the Matrix but for now my reply would be - you "chose" to see a fat brown buffalo every single time before observation. During the observation, you are trying to understand why you made that choice.

Sometimes you like your choices; sometime you don't.

What you are really looking for is the power to choose what you want to see.I am afraid, I don't have that power (well, doh!). If you can develop that power, good for you.

Nando's chocolate cake is divine!!!


@genie - you know everything about everything don't you?

Originally posted by: Arwen.

@genie - you know everything about everything don't you?

When Alexander Bell invented the telephone he had 3 missed calls from Genie

Genie knows how to slam a revolving door

Genie doesn't wear a watch. She decides what time it is.

Genie doesn't read books. She stares them down until she gets the information she wants.

Genie knows how to divide 1 by 0.

Is Genie Rajnikanth or Chuck Norris?

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

Is Genie Rajnikanth or Chuck Norris?

Some people wear Chuck Norris' or Rajnikanth's T-shirts.

Chuck Norris and Rajnikanth wear Genie's T-shirts.

You guys are having way too much fun trolling me. 🤔😆