Could 9/11 have really been an inside job

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

373577

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: return_to_hades
There was no "molten steel" formed. What was found is semi-molten, twisted, deformed and structurally damaged steel. The fires were hot enough to cause that kind of damage.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/

There are articles that differ in their findings. There is a lot of contrast to the findings reported by the "Conspiracy theorists" and the "debunkers". It is becoming difficult to know which one is reporting the truth 🤔

".----the research of Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, and others have established that there were very high temperatures present in the building, not just enough to weaken steel, but to melt it. They found evidence for thermite in the rubble pile. There were pools of molten steel under the rubble piles of Buildings 1 and 2 (the North and South Towers) and Building 7 that remained molten for weeks after the building collapses, indicating a continuing energy source. NASA thermal images show evidence of high temperatures on the surface of the rubble pile for literally months, indicating even higher temperatures below. Furthermore, several research groups found tiny iron spheres in the dust scattered all over Manhattan. These are from tiny droplets of molten iron that solidified before hitting the ground. For there to be tiny spheres of iron in the dust, there had to be temperatures above the melting point of iron, and a blast event to atomize the molten iron into droplets during the collapse of the building, for it to be distributed with the dust. These are droplets of iron, not steel. They did not come from the structural steel of the towers. Iron spheres are an expected byproduct of the thermite reaction. Along with the iron spheres, Steven Jones also discovered red and gray layered chips in the dust samples, which turned out to have the signature of thermite.----"

Quote

..Zainab..

@..Zainab..

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: Summer3

No country wants to kill their own people unless they are mad. But it is likely that some terrorists could be working in some of the offices in the building for a while and planning the attack. Many undercover terrorists doing all the planning is expected

Generally there is strong hatred for Americans in some of the Middle eastern countries due to their support of Israel and also their intervention in Middle east wars. The list is pretty long ...

http://ancientroadpublications.com/Studies/BiblicalStudies/MuslimsHateAmericans.html

@Bold THIS!

I also dont believe the people will ever find out the real truth for the investigators still rely on theories themselves. Instead of carving paths new surprises arise every day.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

..Zainab..

@..Zainab..

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: zorrro

Terror outfits working secretly in various countries is no news. Setting up of bombs in a preplanned way to blow up a building as busy as the WTC right under the noses of thousands of people is what seems incredulous. Yet something must have happened to make the steel supports melt and give way the way it did. Just an aeroplane strike shouldnt be enough to make the tower crumble down like a pack of cards 😳 Try going through the link I provided.

See the way it played out when it occurred and how perfectly it all worked out for them...any one could tell it was a long thought out plan that took a great amount of time.

Many attacks have been happening here again recently, and they are getting blamed on the act of "terrorism." While i dont outright believe thats right i dont think its wrong either. The people who get caught, seem so fishy and just not right.

Quote

souro

@souro

Alumni

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: ..Zainab..

See the way it played out when it occurred and how perfectly it all worked out for them...any one could tell it was a long thought out plan that took a great amount of time.

Many attacks have been happening here again recently, and they are getting blamed on the act of "terrorism." While i dont outright believe thats right i dont think its wrong either. The people who get caught, seem so fishy and just not right.

You don't outright believe that terrorism is right or you don't outright believe that it is indeed terrorism?

As for how perfectly it worked out for them, what exactly did you expect? Whether planned or unplanned, the result was going to be the same always. It was US army vs Osama's minions, what a match up really. If the US really had to make up a reason to attack Taliban Afghanistan, all they needed to do was to tell the world, 'Look we are going to bomb those bunch of cave dwellers' and everyone would've applauded. The world, except for a few Islamic nations, hated their gut. US didn't need to waste billions of dollars in assets and thousands of human lives to get that approval.

Edited by souro - 9 years ago

Quote

..Zainab..

@..Zainab..

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: souro

You don't outright believe that terrorism is right but you think it is not wrong either, because to you the terrorists who get caught look fishy. Did I understand you correctly?

As for how perfectly it worked out for them, what exactly did you expect? Whether planned or unplanned, the result was going to be the same always. It was US army vs Osama's minions, what a match up really. If the US really had to make up a reason to attack Taliban Afghanistan, all they needed to do was to tell the world, 'Look we are going to bomb those bunch of cave dwellers' and everyone would've applauded. The world, except for a few Islamic nations, hated their gut. US didn't need to waste billions of dollars in assets and thousands of human lives to get that approval.

I didnt realize that statement was a bit confusing. What I mean is the people that get blamed for it, do not seem like the ones who would be the ones behind the vicious planning yet they seem as they were blackmailed, threatened to perform and partake in such a plan.

There was a San bernando shooting, California. Where a couple was blamed for it. They had a couple month year old baby as well. And when their home was raided it was like any other normal couple's house. Also the wife, the female was sought out to be like 95-105 pounds but she apparently had a heavier weapon on her. My point being that there have been plenty of cases before hand as where the so called "criminal" was later found out to be innocent because they were threatened and blackmailed to do what they did.

http://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/san-bernardino-california-shooters/

And not once did I state that US was involved in this, neither did they attack their own country. Why would anyone do that? Unless youre mentally unstable. One last thing, the so called Muslims who attacked NY, where i live and lived my whole life, arent REAL Muslims, and have no idea what Islam is really about. Bring a religion into a horrible light, tarnishing its image is what these extremists are currently doing.

I rest my case.

Quote

souro

@souro

Alumni

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: ..Zainab..

I didnt realize that statement was a bit confusing. What I mean is the people that get blamed for it, do not seem like the ones who would be the ones behind the vicious planning yet they seem as they were blackmailed, threatened to perform and partake in such a plan.

There was a San bernando shooting, California. Where a couple was blamed for it. They had a couple month year old baby as well. And when their home was raided it was like any other normal couple's house. Also the wife, the female was sought out to be like 95-105 pounds but she apparently had a heavier weapon on her. My point being that there have been plenty of cases before hand as where the so called "criminal" was later found out to be innocent because they were threatened and blackmailed to do what they did.
http://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/san-bernardino-california-shooters/

And not once did I state that US was involved in this, neither did they attack their own country. Why would anyone do that? Unless youre mentally unstable. One last thing, the so called Muslims who attacked NY, where i live and lived my whole life, arent REAL Muslims, and have no idea what Islam is really about. Bring a religion into a horrible light, tarnishing its image is what these extremists are currently doing.

I rest my case.

I don't know what weapon the lady was carrying, but modern day weapons tend to be not very heavy.

I don't think it is that easy to blackmail someone to go to a suicide mission. Someone can be tricked into a suicide mission or blackmailed into committing a crime which by accident resulted in the person's death, but blackmailing them to an obvious suicide mission doesn't sound plausible. If the state gives me an option of committing a crime and being shot dead OR seeing my life ruined, I'll choose the latter. Because in a free democratic country I can approach the media, the judiciary and the common people for support and make a case out of it. I can even migrate to another country. What will I gain by participating in a crime knowing fully well that I'll be dead at the end of it?