Is a higher birthrate the solution? - Page 11

Originally posted by: souro

The transition has to be well planned to ensure minimum resistance, which would require either peacefully or by force to gradually remove all top level administrators from the other religions who might have any control over the army or police.

Originally posted by: zorrro

If you think a debate over religion and birthrate is bad what do you think of the bloodshed being hinted at 🤔 If talks of increasing birthrate seemed to be ludicrous then the bloodshed as a solution looks downright sinister

You clearly miss out on pun intended in my statement. Anyways, all I was trying to say is both Religion and Birth Rate are highly debatable subjects and there is no end to the debate...

I am not aware of any data existing about the different religions campaigning against FP but there have been many incidents of people from many religious groups who have advised against following FP methods due to fear of dwindling nos. be it Muslims, Hindus, Christians or some indigenous tribal groups. Its usually the working class and the educated people who prefer to limit their family size due to obvious personal issues.

Religion plays a big role in influencing decision about birth control use. Basically all religions believe in family planning but what they argue about is the method used...

Originally posted by: Gubbara.

lol...kuch bhi..just coz you want me to come back and refute your baseless allegations?😆

You guys are better off this way. Trust me you dont need someone like me around here to create a menace in this peaceful forum😳. I am not a serious debater like you guys are and i will only prove to be nuisance where some of you Oxford literates are discussing and finding solutions to better our future😆 You guys have seen how bazigar exploded on one comment of mine😆😆. That's what happens wherever i go.

anyway,I will be keeping an eye on this section from now on. Love reading your worldly views on things that matters the most... Nice meeting y'all. See ya around!😛

Originally posted by: -Aarya-

You clearly miss out on pun intended in my statement. Anyways, all I was trying to say is both Religion and Birth Rate are highly debatable subjects and there is no end to the debate...

Ms Aarya ji the subject is being debated because it is debatable 😳

Religion plays a big role in influencing decision about birth control use. Basically all religions believe in family planning but what they argue about is the method used...

I dont think all religions believe in FP and the only argument is about the method to employ. Some groups outrightly reject it in any form. Anyway, the method employed should be a subject left for the couple and their doctor to decide.

The real question should be why only certain religion cultural having more kids than others?

Ignorance, lack of education, accessibility, poverty, religious beliefs- all play a role.

As I mentioned in earlier post, infiltration of migrants across the porous borders also is adding to the nos. The politicians are responsible and also bribe accepting sentinels at the border.

Originally posted by: charminggenie

In a state like this I wonder , if Hinduism will actually stand as one cohesive unit or bifurcate on the basis of caste, sects and others.

I share your concerns regarding this.

What will happen to Jains, Sikhs and other non-muslim communities , where will they go.

They are indigenous religious group of India and dont have to go anywhere else.

In a situation where Hinduism is established as the foremost religion , there might just be a serious case of different ideologies within Hinduism clashing. We had it in a past Vaishnavites-Saivites, when there was no apparent foreign invasion .

Conflicts are bound to continue. It is not as if all conflicts would end with India becoming a Hindurashtra. Today this and tomorrow that--- 😛

For a nation to adapt a particular religion as a state policy , they will need to doctrine it's nomenclature, clauses,give it some shape . How will the majority agree on the one definition of Hinduism considering the religion is practiced so distinctly region to region in India.

Before the need to kicking out or easing others out arises, won't it be beneficial to actually understand how are we going to ever have a common consensus on Hinduism.

Valid concerns. indeed.

Also while we are at it, how do all this counter naxals, Maoists because the death toll is most for those attacks but first how will be bracket them religion wise , clearly they are non-muslims though.

Terrorism is terrorism and should be dealt with as such irrespective of their religious background. I dont think Souro suggested any concessions to hindu criminals.

Funny though, how Bhagwad Gita itself proponents the idea of secular state, when it mentions- "All created beings have their source in these two natures. Of all that is material and all that is spiritual in this world, know for certain that I am both the origin and the dissolution"~ If everything and everyone submerges in the absolute One then call it whatever name you like, the end will just be the one, doesn't it seem to contradict the idea of a establishing one religion as supreme. If the text says discrimination, bifurcation is useless and redundant than how can the religion based on it's teaching implement one religion supremacy across a state.

It would have been so much easier if all religions understood the truth contained therein.

Actually its quite possible that the founders of all great religions realised it but not so the followers!

Originally posted by: souro

If you are talking about current legal grounds, I don't think it will be feasible, but as I had said earlier, laws can be changed.