Posted:
Originally posted by: Angel-likeDevil
You have lots of patience, and thankyou. 😆 everytime you write your pov is panning out more clearly. Yes, that's a very valid point you made. I think every man is encouraged because there are still those bits and fragments of primeval tendencies... I really wonder if women didnt pursue any men 'back in those days' ?? 🤔- Me too..🤔 😆 .. but in my head its like what we see on the discovery channel now-a-days..😆..men compete , women wait for results & the best man wins..😎 🤣venturing out as in, if a man or woman wants to go 'indulge' with someone , it shouldnt bother...anyways, that was my personal view, because I dont believe fidelity exists.- Perspective.. because strictly speaking, physical (sexual) fidelity can be achieved if enough will power is exercised but mental fidelity is something that is difficult to achieve & quantify..however, i saw another documentary on discovery channel a few years ago , which dealt with a study conducted on 'couples who claimed to be truly in love'..they were subjected to various images & audios including that of sexual/erotic in nature & randomly their respective spouse's/partner's visuals & audios were thrown in & a lot of things were measured , like , heart beats , brain activity ..etc to give an idea of how they reacted to each visual & audio stimulation..and the studies found that 'couples in love' truly do exist & fidelity of both kinds too exists..this fidelity thing (mental & physical) was especially startling in the case of men , since it has been long thought that men are inherently wired to mate with as many women as possible..the studies showed that men in a committed relationship have developed certain biological mechanisms through which they are able to go against their natural instincts , they decrease the testosterone levels in their body & the part of brain responsible for seeking out or getting enticed by new women ( no matter how attractive) is slowed down or in some cases completely inactive..- you see now, how much man has evolved ? 😆.anonymous sex is sort of considered a masculine quality & for a good reason too..if a woman has let a man sleep with her , there is almost always a chance that she ll end up wanting more from him..@bold - huh? how are prostitutes working then? 😕 ...I think women are restrictied because there are chances of her being "mis-used"(drugged, sold, trafficked, mms-ed, photographed, video-taped, STDs, etc etc)-probably why prostitutes are barely even considered as humans..😕..probably why prostitutes & girls involved in trafficking, though a victim ,are still seen as less of a human..🤔.. i mean, i for one never understood why a girl who has been violated against her will is still looked down upon..i never understood the logic behind it , if a man is raped , he is looked down upon since he is in an emasculated state & people look down upon emasculated men, so there is some (cruel) logic in that (horrible i know , but i guess its changing & hopefully will change for the best)..but a female when violated is simply violated, there is no reason y she should be looked down up (though its true that female victims get more support than male victims for this reason only)..& even women who are prostitutes by their own free will arent exactly seen in a good light, are they ?..everybody says it is bcoz of the stigma attached to this profession, but how did this stigma happen in the first place ?.. whats so unacceptable about a woman selling sex by using her body ?..i believe this is the reason , its probably bcoz they go against their basic instincts to such an extreme that they could barely qualify as humans in the society..🤔BTW, men who're like that too are looked at in bad light in today's society...although, yes. with women the issue is on a different wavelength altogether.
-yes.. society is changing for sure but our primeval tendencies still marks its presence in some or the other way..may be someday these tendencies will completely disappear through evolution..whether this change is good or bad - cant say as of now - it could be anything -but lets be optimistic 😊Modern society - so your saying it has been doing the right thing, for the sustenance of the man?- No..not what i meant.. i meant modern society is different & can sometimes go against nature, sometimes it favors men by eliminating the extreme competitions that used to take place in primeval times but it may not be how nature intended it to be..i have always maintained that i dont think arranged marriages are in favor of mother nature..my example of a gay man in a heterosexual union or fathering a child was meant for illustrating that..modern society does have a strong potential to go against the law of nature..But gay man isnt satisfying his needs, what about that?- Yeah & our society forces them to be in an unhappy relationship..if these men were left alone to follow their instincts, they would have ended up in a place & situation which mother nature intended for them..but again this perception too is changing in favor of the mother nature..however, gay people being biological parents may not be something that mother nature intended for them ( it sounds harsh but its just my perception).. there are several instances wherein it has been observed that a gay couple in animal species will adopt a young one & raise them as their own..and may be that is what mother nature intended for these people..instead of procreating urself through artificial means try to support the already stranded children..that way mother nature has a role for everybody ..but ofcourse, these are just my thoughts & opinions..😊
..i ll do, promote & standby what appeals to my perception of whats right & whats wrong in modern times (which is mostly if not always dictated by my religion - Hinduism )..😊
Bindi
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2
Jodha Akbar
