Tidbits, Trivias... Share what you want II - Page 11

Created

Last reply

Replies

303

Views

103.3k

Users

43

Likes

200

Frequent Posters

-Believe- thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
Some more info:
After Downing Street, July 6, 2007
Title: "Is the United States Killing 10,000 Iraqis Every Month? Or Is It More?"
Author: Michael Schwartz

AlterNet, September 17, 2007
Title: "Iraq death toll rivals Rwanda genocide, Cambodian killing fields"
Author: Joshua Holland

Reuters (via AlterNet), January 7, 2008
Title: "Iraq conflict has killed a million, says survey"
Author: Luke Baker

Inter Press Service, March 3, 2008
Title: "Iraq: Not our country to Return to"
Authors: Maki al-Nazzal and Dahr Jamail

Student Researchers: Danielle Stanton, Tim LeDonne, and Kat Pat Crespn
Faculty Evaluator: Heidi LaMoreaux, PhD

Over one million Iraqis have met violent deaths as a result of the 2003 invasion, according to a study conducted by the prestigious British polling group, Opinion Research Business (ORB). These numbers suggest that the invasion and occupation of Iraq rivals the mass killings of the last century"the human toll exceeds the 800,000 to 900,000 believed killed in the Rwandan genocide in 1994, and is approaching the number (1.7 million) who died in Cambodia's infamous "Killing Fields" during the Khmer Rouge era of the 1970s.

more: http://www.projectcensored.org/1-over-one-million-iraqi-deaths-caused-by-us-occupation/

"Obama is restlessly heading towards war in Syria like Bush was heading towards war in Iraq. Like in Iraq, this war would be illegitimate and Obama will become Bush's clone," Alexei Pushkov


Source says: America would need to make well over $1 Trillion in profit from the war. The best way for a country to make money off a war directly is by selling weapons and equipment to the side it supports.

Let's take an example from the Iraq and Afghan wars, which allocated some $138 billion of U.S. taxpayer money to such companies, according to International Business Times. The number one recipient of such governmental contracts is KBR, Inc., a Houston-based engineering and construction firm focusing on energy " a firm that is the sister company of Halliburton Co.. The company received $39.5 billion in Iraq-related contracts " including a good amount of deals done without competing bids. Who was the CEO of Halliburton from 1995 to 2000 and was later our country's VP? Dick Cheney. I think you get the picture.

An astonishing photograph of John Kerry having a cozy and intimate dinner with Bashar al-Assad has emerged at the moment the U.S Secretary of State is making the case to bomb the Syrian dictator's country and remove him from power.

Kerry, who compared Assad to Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein yesterday, is pictured around a small table with his wife Teresa Heinz and the Assads in 2009.

Assad and Kerry, then a Massachusetts senator, lean in towards each other and appear deep in conversation as their spouses look on.

A waiter is pictured at their side with a tray of green drinks, believed to be lemon and crushed mint.




Cosy: This astonishing photograph shows the U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and his wife having an intimate dinner with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad and his wife in 2009

Cosy: This astonishing photograph shows the U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and his wife having an intimate dinner with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad and his wife in 2009

Cosy: This astonishing photograph shows the U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and his wife having an intimate dinner with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad and his wife in 2009

Relaxed: A waiter carries over a tray of drinks, which appear to look like cocktails

The picture was likely taken in February 2009 in the Naranj restaurant in Damascus, when Kerry led a delegation to Syria to discuss finding a way forward for peace in the region.

While President Barack Obama has softened his military threat against Syria by putting the question to Congress and guaranteeing at least a week's delay, Kerry remains outspoken about the dangers posed by the Syrian regime.


dailymail.com


Another possible reason for deciding to be in charge of thwarting all evil, a role the U.S. has chosen to take on, is for reputation. A reputation of a country and the power they possess " or are believed to possess " is of course of the highest importance on such global chessboards. The most common belief is that a country like the U.S. (and, in this situation, Britain and France) is after two things and two things only: money and power.

Why not do that while making money and holding on to your reputation? Making money, gaining power and emphasizing one's reputation, while projecting an image of saintliness is a great game plan. Unfortunately, the line between moral and immoral tends to get blurred the deeper you get into politics...

Why is it that the USA like to interfere with other countries...why they not attacking NORTH KOREA??! ...Countries don't go to war for no reason...People need to overlook the fact that we're invading a country, and look at the true reason why...After ten years of the U.S. Invasion, the Afghan and Iraqi democracy is still limited and its future looks gray. Bomb blasts are still a regular occurrence in Baghdad. Ordinary Iraqis are not experiencing benefits from democracy. It is still an unstable country run by the sectarian-driven and corrupt political elite. Change was imposed on Iraq, not privileged, and was followed by civil war... USA needs a lesson as they got in Vietnam!..

Edited by Prometeus - 12 years ago
Bazigar thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
All of these are no revolution , no rebel for betterment of life . Everthing from Iraq , syria , egypt everything related to crap sectarian violence and dominance of religious extremism. Even interesting to see many arab countries side on the line of sectarian alliance. In the end many countries goes into the gulp of invasion from outsiders and nothing else.
413226 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago

Argentine mother swaps 11-year-old daughter for freezer: The girl, now in protective custody, was then allegedly forced to work alongside other children in an illegal aluminum pan factory in Buenos Aires where she was sexually abused.



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/argentine-mother-swaps-11-year-old-daughter-freezer-cops-article-1.1443449#ixzz2duBHlfSW
-Believe- thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago

Take aim: Chinese inventor creates contraption to help you Pee Straight (and yes, it is for women too)

  • The Pee Straight device has gone on sale in Shenzhen, southern China
  • A new law could see those who make a mess in the toilet fined $15

It's a minor misdemeanour that lands millions of men across the world in trouble with their wives.

But help could finally be here for those who miss the mark and wet the toilet seat while relieving themselves, thanks to a Chinese invention.

The Pee Straight contraption is effectively a standard funnel attached to a 10 inch pipe designed to help both men and women with their aim.

Take aim: Two Chinese women sell the Pee Straight invention outside a public toilet in the city of Shenzhen

Take aim: Two Chinese women sell the Pee Straight invention outside a public toilet in the city of Shenzhen

Bemused: This man seems amused by the saleswoman's attempts to convince him to invest in one of the inventions

Bemused: This man seems amused by the saleswoman's attempts to convince him to invest in one of the inventions



The law also punishes anyone who is found grafittiing, smoking or littering public loos.

As well as helping to keep Shenzhen's toilets sparkling, the inventor also claims that the Pee Straight affords its user a degree of privacy while at the urinal.

The device comes in male and female versions, with the women's having a shorter pipe.

Handy: The devices have been introduced in the wake of a new law that could see residents of the city fined $15 if they make a mess while relieving themselves

Handy: The devices have been introduced in the wake of a new law that could see residents of the city fined $15 if they make a mess while relieving themselves

According to NBC News, city officials wouldn't comment on whether on not anyone had been fined under the new law.

While many took to social networking sites in China to ridicule both the new law and the subsequent invention, others were clearly impressed.

One user urged the inventor to have the device patented as soon as possible on Weibo, China's answer to Twitter.

Shenzhen was recently declared the world's most unfriendly city by Conde Nast Traveller magazine.



source:dailymail

😆

Bazigar thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago

What Happened to the "Global War on Terrorism"? The U.S. is "Fighting for Al Qaeda" in Syria.

al qaedaAmericans have been repeatedly told that Al Qaeda under the helm of the late Osama bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

Formulated in the wake of the tragic events of september 11, 2001, the U.S. and its allies launched a "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT) directed against the numerous "jihadist" Al Qaeda affiliated terror formations in the Middle East, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia. The first stage of the "Global War on Terrorism" was the bombing and invasion of Afghanistan.

In the wake of 9/11, the" Global War on Terrorism" served to obfuscate the real economic and strategic objectives behind the US-led wars in the Middle East and Central Asia.

The Patriot legislation was implemented. The national security doctrine stated unequivocally that the American Homeland was to be protected against "Islamic terrorists".

For the last 13 years, war on terrorism rhetoric has permeated political discourse at all levels of government. Al Qaeda related threats and occurrences are explained -by politicians, the corporate media, Hollywood and the Washington think tanks- under a single blanket "bad guys" heading, in which Al Qaeda ("the outside enemy of America") is casually and repeatedly pinpointed as "the cause" of numerous terror events around the World.

But somehow, in the last few months, this "Al Qaeda paradigm" has shifted. The American public has become increasingly skeptical regarding the validity of the "Global War on Terrorism"

In recent months, with the unfolding events in Syria, something rather unusual has occurred, which has had a profound impact on the public's perception and understanding of Obama's "Global War on Terrorism".

The US government is actively and openly supporting Syria's Al Nusrah, the main fighting force affiliated to al Qaeda, largely composed of foreign mercenaries.

Tax dollars are relentlessly channeled to the "rebels". In turn, Secretary of State John Kerry meets with rebel commanders who oversee the Al Qaeda affiliated entity.

Is this part of a "new normal": the unity of opposites whereby "terrorism" and "counter-terrorism" are merged into a single foreign policy focus?

Is it "politically correct" for a US Senator to mingle with leaders of a terrorist organization, while at the same time paying lip service to the "Global War on Terrorism"?

While this may be "business as usual" for the US Secretary of State, American servicemen and women are now "refusing to fight" a war in favor of terrorism under the emblem of the "Global War on Terrorism".

Channeling money and weapons to Al Qaeda in Syria is carried out "in the open", via the US State Department and the Pentagon rather than in the context of a covert CIA operation.

John McCain enters Syria illegally and poses for photo ops with Al Qaeda leaders.

Hawkish US Senator John McCain (C) poses with infamous kidnapper in Syria, Mohamed Nour (seen with his hand on his chest and holding a camera)

Hawkish US Senator John McCain (C) poses with infamous kidnapper in Syria, Mohamed Nour (seen with his hand on his chest and holding a camera)

The Movement within the US Armed Forces

Needless to say, this mingling of politicians and terrorists strikes at the very foundations of the "Global War on Terrorism".

Despite the tide of media disinformation, people are increasingly aware that these US sponsored rebels are not "revolutionaries" and that US military aid is being channeled to the terror brigades.

A spontaneous movement on social media networks has emerged involving active members of the armed forces.

"I will not fight for al Qaeda".

"Obama, I will not fight for your al Qaeda rebels in Syria."

"Our government tells us that we are fighting a war on terrorism." That is what is taught to new recruits in the Armed Forces. "We're spreading democracy by combating terrorism".

Yet in recent months, millions of Americans have become aware of the fact that the Obama administration is lying.

Supporting the Terrorists

Barack Obama and John Kerry are not fighting terrorism. Quite the opposite: They are actively supporting Al Qaeda terrorists in Syria, who are responsible for the most despicable crimes, killings and atrocities directed against the civilian population.

These crimes have been amply documented. Beheadings, executions of children. The most gruesome massacres.

The Al Nusrah brigades have performed thousands of executions. A recently released video reveals how two young boys are executed following the reading of a death sentence."In the video can be seen a terrorist reading death sentence to the boys, gunfire is heard, boys fall dead."

Are these the people who are being supported by the US government?

The terrorists are directly recruited by the Western military alliance. They are trained in Saudi Arabia and Qatar in liaison with the US and NATO.

These are the rebels who, according to CNN, have also been trained by Western special forces in the use of chemical weapons. And they have used chemical weapons against innocent Syrian civilians.

US servicemen and women are adamant. "I did not join the army to fight for al Qaeda."

We were recruited to wage a "Global War on Terrorism" and now our government is collaborating with Al Qaeda.

Congressman Dennis Kucinich said "striking Syria would make the U.S. Military Al-Qaeda's Air Force'".

The concept which is spreading across the land is that the Obama administration is supporting Al Qaeda.

It's a bipartisan consensus: the Republican leadership in the US Congress and the Senate have endorsed support and financial aid to the al Nusrah brigades in Syria.

In the eyes of public opinion, the Global War on Terrorism has, so to speak, fallen flat.

Who is Supporting Whom? Who is Waging a War of Aggression?

The spontaneous movement in the armed forces is based on the notion that the "US government is supporting al Qaeda".

The corporate media has failed to reveal the nature of the longstanding relationship between Al Qaeda and the US government, which goes back to the Soviet-Afghan war.

Al Qaeda -the "outside enemy of America" as well as the alleged architect of the 9/11 attacks- is a creation of the CIA. Al Qaeda and its affiliates are often referred to as "intelligence assets"

From the outset of the Soviet-Afghan war in the early 1980s, the US intelligence apparatus has supported the formation of "Islamic brigades".

Propaganda purports to erase the history of Al Qaeda, drown the truth and "kill the evidence" on how this "outside enemy" was fabricated and transformed into "Enemy Number One".

The Global War on Terrorism is not geared towards curbing the "Islamic jihad". The significant development of "radical Islam" in the wake of the Cold War was consistent with Washington's hidden agenda. The latter consists in sustaining rather than combating international terrorism, with a view to creating factional divisions within countries and destabilizing national societies.

The numerous al Qaeda affiliated entities are routinely used in CIA covert operations. They are recruited, trained and indoctrinated under the supervision of the CIA and its intelligence counterparts in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Qatar and Israel. Unknown to the American public, the US has spread the teachings of the "Islamic jihad" in textbooks "Made in America", developed at the University of Nebraska

Al Qaeda is an intelligence asset which serves the interests of the US administration.

With regard to Syria, the US government is not "supporting Al Qaeda" Quite the opposite, the Al Qaeda mercenaries in Syria, recruited and trained in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, are "supporting the US government". They are being used by the US military intelligence apparatus. They are paid killers.

Their actions are implemented as part of a military agenda; they are the foot-soldiers of the Western military alliance. The atrocities committed by the terrorists are the direct result of paramilitary training and indoctrination. The US government is behind this process. Obama is responsible for the crimes committed by the "rebels" against the Syrian people.

Concluding Remarks

We are at an important crossroads. The "Global War on Terrorism" constitutes the cornerstone of war propaganda. Yet at the same time the lies which uphold the GWOT are no longer credible and the thrust and effectiveness of the propaganda campaign are threatened.

No one can reasonably believe in a "war on terrorism" which consists in channeling money and weapons to the terrorists. Its a non sequitur.

"Support to terrorists", portrayed as "revolutionaries" cannot be heralded as part of a foreign policy agenda which officially consists in "going after the terrorists".

But Obama desperately needs to hold on to the "Global war on Terrorism". It's the cornerstone of US military doctrine. It's a worldwide crusade.

Without the "Global War on Terrorism", the Obama administration does not have a leg to stand on: its military doctrine collapses like a deck of cards.

Undermining the credibility of the "Global War on Terrorism" is a powerful instrument of counter-propaganda.

We call on people across the land: Mobilize against Obama's war.

The war on Syria is illegal and criminal.

The President and Commander in Chief's decision to support Al Qaeda in Syria is in violation of international law and US anti terrorism legislation .

US and coalition troops have a moral and legal obligation to refuse to fight in Obama's "humanitarian war" on Syria, which consists in supporting Al Qaeda affiliated terrorists.

The President and Commander in Chief has blatantly violated all tenets of domestic and international law. So that making an oath to "obey orders from the President" is tantamount to violating rather than defending the US Constitution.

"The moral and legal obligation is to the U.S. Constitution and not to those who would issue unlawful orders, especially if those orders are in direct violation of the Constitution and the UCMJ." (Mosqueda, US troops have "A Duty To Disobey all Unlawful orders". http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MOS303A.html )

"Refusing to fight" an illegal war implies a rejection of the legitimacy of the Commander in Chief. It denies the Obama administration the authority to conduct an illegal and criminal war on behalf of the American people.

And the American people must support the US servicemen and women who refuse to fight in an illegal war.

Obama is a war criminal. He is supporting terrorists, who are his paid killers. Amply documented Syria's rebels have been trained in the use of chemical weapons and they have used chemical weapons against innocent civilians.

The Global War on Terrorism is a fabrication and a lie.

War is an illegal undertaking.

According to Nuremberg jurisprudence, the ultimate war crime consists in starting a war. Obama and his European counterparts including David Cameron and Francois Hollande are responsible for the supreme crime: "the crime against peace." This war is illegal irrespective of a decision of the UN Security Council to intervene in the internal affairs of a sovereign state:

"All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations... Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter." UN Charter - 1: Purposes and Principles

http://www.globalresearch.ca/what-happened-to-the-global-war-on-terrorism-the-u-s-is-fighting-for-al-qaeda-in-syria/5348210


Interesting perspective

Best quote: Congressman Dennis Kucinich said "striking Syria would make the U.S. Military Al-Qaeda's Air Force'". ⭐️

Edited by ramjaane - 12 years ago
Bazigar thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
-Believe- thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
Food for laugh!!
Samunder Ki Gilee Ret Par 1 Ladka
Baitha Tha..
.
Usne Apne Sath Baithi Ladki Se
Pucha:" Tum Bolti q Nhi..??
.
..
To bade hi romentic andaz me Vo
Palke Jhuka Kar
Muskurayi aur Ret pe likha.
.

.
.
.
Muh Me Ghutkaa hai..😳
------------------

4 Saal lagte hain ek insaan ko
engineer ban-ne mein...
.

.Phir Chahay saari zindgi laga lo...
.

Wo wapas insaan nahi ban sakta... 😕

----------------------------------------
Husband Apni Saas Se
Apki Beti Mein To
Hazaron Kamiyan Hain.
.
..
.
.
Saas - Haan Beta,
Isi Vajah Se To Use
Achcha Ladka Nahi Mila...😆
----------------------------------
Doctor-Kaise Ana hua.?
Santa-Doc Sab,
Tabiyat Theek Nhi he,
Liver me pain ho rha hai..
.
Doctor- Sharaab Peete ho.??
.
.
Santa- Haan, Par Chota Peg hi
Banana!!😛
----------------------------------------------
After Accident:
American:" Its Fine Man..
.
British:" I am So Sorry..
.
Australia:" No Worries Dude..
.
Germany:" Are You Okay.. ??
.
.
.
.
Indian:" Andha hai kya saale..??
dhakkan ki tarah chala raha hai..
akkal ke dushman saale tere baap ki road hai
kya ??
Chal bahar nikal dekh teri kaise bajata hun... :@
Hahaha..Indians Rocks..
Agree Indians ?? 😛😛

-------------------

Perfect example of confidence:

.
A junior in an office dialed his boss's
number by
mistake & said :
Hey, send a coffee in my cabin in two
minutes !...


boss shouted : do you know
whom you're talking to ?!!!!!!

Junior : no!

.
Boss: i'm the boss of this office.

.
Junior (in the same tone) : & do u
know whom
you're talking to?

.
Boss: no!

Junior: thank God. (and disconnected da phone)...

Edited by Vinzy - 12 years ago
-Believe- thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago

No 17 on the way for UK's biggest family: Couple who has had a baby every 17 months for the past 24 years is expecting 😲

They are way beyond their baker's dozen. But Britain's biggest family still has room for more as supermum Sue Radford is pregnant again... with her 17th baby.

The baker's wife is expecting - just 11 months after giving birth to Casper - and she and husband Noel will welcome the latest addition in April.

The couple, of Morecambe, Lancashire, don't know whether it will be a boy or a girl.

The bigger the better: Sue and Noel Radford, from Morecambe, Lancashire, pictured with their oldest 15 children, have announced the happy news that number 17 is on the way

The bigger the better: Sue and Noel Radford, from Morecambe, Lancashire, pictured with their oldest 15 children, have announced the happy news that number 17 is on the way

They say they are absolutely thrilled' to be having another baby, who will be a sibling for Chris, 24, Sophie, 19, Chloe, 18, Jack, 16, Daniel, 14, Luke, 12, Millie, 12, Katie, ten, James, nine, Ellie, eight, Aimee, seven, Josh, five, Max, four, Tilly, three, Oscar, two and Casper, 11 months.


Mrs Radford wrote on Facebook after her 12-week scan: We are so excited to announce Radford baby 17 will be joining this family in April.

As you can imagine, the children are so excited. Little Tilly said to me: "Mummy you have a baby in your tummy". It was so sweet.' But she added: I feel so sick. Whoever named it morning sickness was lying. Try morning, noon and night sickness.'

The hard-working couple, who own a bakery, live in a former children's home and use a minibus to get around.

Lucky number 17: The Radfords have been a couple for over 25 years and have nine sons and seven daughters - and one granddaughter

Lucky number 17: The Radfords have been a couple for over 25 years and have nine sons, seven daughters - and one granddaughter


source Dailymail

Lage rahoo!!! 👏
Bazigar thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago

Life, rape and death in an Indian city

Wholesale from China ? - 1 Million+ Items, 6000+ Categories. Join Us Free & Save More Now.www.DinoBulk.com/
JASON BURKE
SHARE COMMENT (12) PRINT T+

The brutal gangrape on a Delhi bus in December 2012 highlighted the routine abuse of women in the country and how the nation's surge to superpower status leaves out the millions who live on its margins

It was a Sunday evening routine: heavy drinking, some food, and then out in the bus, cruising Delhi's streets looking for "fun." This particular Sunday, December 16 last year, was like many others for Ram and Mukesh Singh, two brothers living in a slum known as Ravi Das Colony. The "fun," on previous occasions, had meant a little robbery to earn money for a few bottles of cheap whisky and for the roadside prostitutes who work the badly lit roads of the ragged semi-urban, semi-rural zones around the edges of the sprawling Indian capital.

However, this evening would end not with "fun" but with the gang-rape and murder of a 23-year-old woman. The incident was to prompt a global outcry and weeks of protests, and to reveal problems often ignored by those overseas who are perhaps too eager to embrace a heart-warming but simplistic narrative of the rise of prosperity in the world's biggest democracy.

JOURNEY TO DELHI

If sympathy lay, naturally, with the 23-year-old physiotherapist who was the victim of the attack, fascination focused on her assailants. These were not serial sex criminals, psychopaths or brutalised men from the margins of society. Their backgrounds were, perhaps more worryingly, like those of tens of millions of Indian men.

Nor was Ravi Das Colony "the underbelly" of the Indian capital, as one local newspaper described it. Like hundreds of other settlements across the metropolis founded by squatting migrants, its single-room homes are overcrowded and noisy, but its doorsteps are swept clean each night and, though police venture rarely into its narrow lanes, order is maintained by the knowledge that almost every act, even the most intimate, will be instantly known to the entire community.

For Ram and Mukesh Singh, 34 and 26 years old, Ravi Das Colony had been home for most of their lives. Ram earned a living as the driver of a bus that, without necessary permits, carried schoolchildren. Ram's brother intermittently drove a taxi.

The two had grown up on a small homestead in Karauli, a remote eastern part of Rajasthan. They attended a basic local school and came to Delhi in 1997 " as India began to boom after the reforms of the early 1990s " when their landless labourer parents decided to try their luck in the capital.

But any improvement was only marginal. After a decade, their father and mother returned to Karauli and the brothers stayed on in a one-room brick home in Ravi Das camp. Ram, a slim, dark, small man, married a woman with three children. She died of cancer shortly afterwards. After her death, he started drinking heavily and fighting. When he drove his bus into a lorry, he damaged an arm permanently.

Though they left local girls alone, the Singh brothers were known among their neighbours for drunkenness, petty crime and occasional, unpredictable violence. The younger brother, Mukesh, was personable, if impressionable, according to teenagers in the neighbourhood.

Ram Singh spent the afternoon of December 16 visiting relatives elsewhere in the city. The day before, a 17-year-old drifter who had worked with him a year previously as an assistant on his bus had come to collect a debt of 6,000 rupees. The teenager had stayed on, sleeping on the bare floor of the small house. Also staying was 28-year-old Akshay Thakur, who eked out a living helping Ram Singh on his bus, and was homeless.

Both the 17-year-old, known as Munna (under Indian law, the identity of a juvenile offender, a rape victim and any person whose naming could lead to the identification of the juvenile or the victim cannot be revealed; for the purpose of this report, the names of the juvenile offender, the victim, her father and her friend have been changed) and Thakur had their own troubled histories. The eldest of five children, Munna was born to a destitute day labourer who developed mental health issues and his wife in a village 150 miles east of Delhi, in the vast northern State of Uttar Pradesh which has 180 million inhabitants and socio-economic indicators often worse than those in sub-Saharan Africa. As in rural Rajasthan, where the Singh brothers came from, women in the countryside of Uttar Pradesh suffer systematic sexual harassment and often violence. Rape is common and gang rape frequent.

When only 10 or 11 years old, Munna was sent from his village home to Delhi. Though for some time he intermittently sent his parents money, they had no idea where he was. According to Munna's statement to police, the country boy had found food, shelter and a meagre wage as a dishwasher and server in cheap dhabas, or roadside foodstalls, in a rough neighbourhood called Trilokpuri, on the margins of the city's sprawl across the northern bank of the stinking, if still holy, river Yamuna.

Munna earned 3,000 rupees a month. One boss remembers a hardworking, slight and personable young man liked by customers who left in the summer of 2011 after Ram Singh, a regular customer, asked him to work as an assistant on his bus. After a few months, Munna moved on again, taking a job as a cleaner at a bus station in the south of Delhi where he slept in empty vehicles. He had stopped sending money home and his parents believed he was dead.

The fourth man, Akshay Thakur also came from a distant village 80 miles from Patna. His journey to Delhi was less direct, taking him five years and through a variety of poorly paid, often physically arduous jobs such as working in brick kilns and selling illegal home-brewed "country liquor" before he ended up replacing Munna, working on Ram Singh's bus.

The four men were thus all representative of a substantial element of contemporary Indian society, semi-skilled and poorly educated, migrants from the country to the town, unmarried in a part of India where men outnumber women and gender imbalances are worsening, drinkers in a city known for high levels of alcohol abuse.

At about 8p.m., after the "party" had been going for nearly three hours, Ram Singh turned to his friends and, according to Munna's statement to the police, said: "Let's go out and have some fun."

On the way to the bus, parked nearby, they invited two friends, Pawan Gupta, a 19-year-old fruit seller and student, and Vinay Sharma, 20, who worked part-time in an expensive gym as a cleaner-cum-instructor, to join them.

Gupta, a relative said, had grown up in a temple in the remote rural town of Basti in north-eastern U.P. He had given up further education to come to Delhi to help his parents run their fruit stall. Still only 20, he was hoping to go to college.

Sharma, the son of a contract labourer, was doing a distance-learning college course in commerce and gave his parents the rest of his 4,000 rupees salary from the gym.

Driven by Mukesh Singh, the bus first headed north-east, along Delhi's choked, congested inner ring road. The men pulled up at designated bus stops, where Munna called out for anyone wanting a ride to Nehru Place, a shopping centre and office complex a few miles away.

After about 10 minutes, a carpenter on his way home from work got on. Within minutes, the man had been beaten and robbed then dumped from the moving vehicle. He did not bother reporting the crime.

By 8.30p.m., after another few abortive attempts to lure passengers aboard, the bus pulled up at a stop in a suburb called Munirka. Munna stood on the step of the bus. "For Palam crossing and Dwarka sector one," he shouted.

WORK LIKE A HORSE, LIVE LIKE A SAINT

Drive into Dwarka and the ragged reality of India's journey to prosperity is very obvious. A narrow flyover takes a stream of vehicles over a railway line where packed trains pass slowly between strips of wasteland strewn with rubbish, faeces, and thin-ribbed cows. Everywhere there are people: labourers streaming to work on a series of unfinished luxury flats; women buying vegetables; schoolchildren in neat uniforms; young men playing with their mobile phones; some beggars. Above soar billboards, advertising a conference with a "real estate guru," a "women's day" at a local gym, and one poster composed of vast portraits of Mohandas Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and the former President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam.

One of the most striking elements of the Delhi gang-rape case is the similarity in the backgrounds of the victim and of her killers. The father of "X" had, like the Singh brothers' father, also left his remote ancestral village for the capital in search of a better life. In 1982, Lakshmi Chand travelled from the U.P.-Bihar border to a city he had never seen.

He had little choice however. The family land had thus been divided so many times that it was insufficient to provide a living for him.

In the city, joined by his wife, Lakshmi Chand laboured in workshops. A sympathetic boss gave him money for a small plot of land in what was then the semi-rural suburb and he built a very modest, cramped two-room home there.

Slowly, over the years, Dwarka developed. Electricity was connected. More people flowed in from the rural areas. A decade passed, then another. Dwarka turned into a small town, then a small city, fused with the metropolis of Delhi itself.

Delhi's airport expanded and Lakshmi Chand, found work as a loader, emptying planes. He worked two eight-hour shifts, each one earning 100 rupees. He left home at 1p.m. and got home at 6a.m.

"I heard once that to escape poverty you need to work like a horse and live like a saint," Lakshmi Chand said later. "That is what I have tried to do all my life."

His first child was a boy who died after three days. Female foetuses are selectively aborted frequently in Delhi and the States around. Lakshmi Chand thought differently, however. "My wife was so sad [that] when we had another child, we did not care if it was a boy or a girl. We just wanted it to survive," he said. The child was X, and she was followed by two boys.

X stood out at the local government school. "She just needed to look at something once and she remembered it," said Lakshmi Chand. "The only thing that interested her was studies."

She had wanted to be a doctor but opted instead for the more modest ambition of physiotherapist and found a college in the northern city of Dehradun offering a four-year course. To raise the 40,000-rupee annual fee, her father sold and mortgaged his land in his village. To cover living expenses X found a job in a call centre in the city.

It was through a mutual friend there that she met Anand, the 28-year-old information technology specialist who was with her on the night of the attack. The two were "just friends," X's father said. There was no question of marriage.

Anand's family were from the upper castes and his father was a wealthy lawyer. He had a good salaried job as an IT specialist. But if there would never have been a match, there could at least be companionship. The couple had been seeing each other for over a year and had even been on a trip to the hills together. But they had not met for more than month however before the attack. It was X, back in Delhi to look for an internship, who suggested a trip to the cinema. Anand picked her up from home and they travelled to Saket Mall, an upmarket shopping centre in the south of Delhi, where they watched "Life of Pi" at a multiplex, leaving at about 8.30p.m. They walked out past the western-branded clothes shops and supermarkets, the new coffee bars, the car rank where drivers pull up in imported 4x4s, past the uniformed security guards, into the darkness of the evening, and started looking for transport home. This was a different India from that which X's father had known.

JUGAAD

Delhi's public transport is grossly inadequate at the best of times. If the reforms of the 1990s unleashed the power of the private sector, they did little to bolster the public sector. Since, public services and institutions, under increasing pressure, have not just failed to keep pace but have often in effect collapsed. As ever in India, where the state fails, jugaad ("frugal innovation") takes over. Unlicensed buses are broadly tolerated, or at least allowed to run, after paying a small bribe.

On this Sunday night there were no official buses to take X and Anand back to Dwarka. No auto-rickshaw wanted such a distant fare either. The couple convinced one driver to take them two miles from the mall to another bus stop, at Munirka.

According to Anand's statement to police, the couple had been waiting only a few minutes when the bus driven by Mukesh Singh pulled up.

The couple got in and sat down, falling for the ruse that the men posing as passengers had prepared. The bus moved off. But within minutes, as the bus drove along Delhi's outer ring road in the direction of the international airport, the atmosphere darkened.

"What are you doing out roaming around with a girl on her own?" Ram Singh asked Anand, according to the accounts given to investigators by both the juvenile and the man. "None of your business," the young IT engineer answered. Then events moved very fast. Ram Singh and the others wrestled Anand to the floor. One shouted: "The rod, [get] the rod." Blows rained down on the helpless man. He was stripped. "I was trying very hard to get to her but they had me nailed down," Anand later told a magistrate.

As Mukesh Singh drove the bus through the heavy traffic, Thakur and Ram Singh had dragged the woman to its back seats, according to the men's statements to police. "They beat her and pressed a hand over her mouth and tore her clothes off," the juvenile's statement says. "Ram Singh first raped her, the girl kept shouting, and one by one all of us [raped her] and [Ram Singh] and the rest of us bit her body."

At exactly 9.54p.m., according to images recorded by cameras " the bus had turned around once again and had reached Mahipalpur, a scruffy collection of cheap hotels and restaurants near the airport. The vehicle had passed through three police checkpoints.

The men stopped the bus at a lay-by and pushed the couple through the front doors. An attempt appears to have been made to run them over. Then they drove away.

Back at Ravi Das Colony, the men sluiced the bus down. They burned the clothes of the couple and went back to the Singh brothers' home. Ram Singh divided up the results of the night's robberies, distributing credit and bank cards, cash and mobiles, jewellery and the shoes.

MAHIPALPUR

Mahipalpur is, like Dwarka, Trilokpuri and Ravi Das Colony itself, another place of transition, another scrawled note on the margin of the story of India's growth. Only a few decades ago it was still a small village; now it is a noisy crossroads where the road to Delhi's airport joins a six-lane highway leading to the satellite city of Gurgaon.

For 40 minutes, X and her friend lay beside a slip road of the highway. Vehicles slowed, almost stopped and then accelerated away, Anand later remembered. Finally, an off-duty worker on the nearby toll highway saw the bystanders and notified the police who arrived and took the couple to hospital.

An hour later, a policeman called X's parents. A friend with a motorbike took her father across the city to Safdarjung hospital, one of Delhi's biggest public medical facilities. He found her on a stretcher.

"I thought she was unconscious but when I laid my hand on her forehead she opened her eyes. She was crying. I told her: It'll be alright, beta [child].'"

Doctors had been appalled at the extent of the woman's injuries, mainly caused by penetration with the metal rods. They attempted to remove the most damaged parts of her intestines and any infection, cleaning as much as possible of what was left and doing whatever else they could to keep her alive. But there was little hope, they all knew. One found her father, who had been waiting outside the operating theatre, and told him that it was unlikely his daughter would survive more than a few hours.

Through the morning, police worked at tracing the white bus that Anand had been able to describe. They found its owner and got an address for Ram Singh.

Very quickly, Singh admitted his involvement in the attack, even producing two iron rods, covered in dry blood. By the end of the week, five of the six were in custody. By then, news of the incident was not just leading every bulletin in the city, but across India, across the world.

PROBLEM CITY

It had long been known that Delhi had a problem with sexual violence. According to India's National Crime Records Bureau, registered rape cases in India had increased by almost 900 per cent over the past 40 years, to 24,206 incidents in 2011, while murder cases had gone up by only 250 per cent over 60 years, and incidences of riot had actually dropped. But Delhi, with its population of 15 million, registered 572 cases of rape, compared with 239 in Mumbai, India's commercial capital, with its bigger population, in 2011. There were just 47 reported in Kolkata.

But no one knows quite what proportion of attacks these figures represent. Some activists say one in 10 rapes is reported; others say it is probably more like one in 100. One poll, in 2011, found that nearly one in four Indian men admitted to having committed some act of sexual violence. Two-thirds of the sample came from the capital.

Then there is the daily low-level harassment in public places, simply accepted as part of life. Polls showed this was regularly encountered by 80 per cent of women in the city. According to one survey, this molestation was seen as harmless by a majority of men in Delhi.

DELHI'S DAUGHTER

But X's case was exceptional, standing out from the mundane background hum of sexual violence in northern India. The attack was of almost unprecedented brutality, committed by complete strangers on a Sunday evening, on the streets of Delhi itself. X was out with a friend watching a film. She was not in a village, nor was she working in a nightclub. She was thus seen as representative in a way that other victims, rightly or wrongly, had never been. Very soon she had been dubbed "Delhi's daughter" in the media, and thus neatly slotted into one of the three legitimate categories allowed to women in India: mother, spouse or child.

Within hours of the news of the assault breaking, protesters were on the streets. The reaction of India's political elite merely fuelled the anger. No parliamentarians joined the marchers. Instead, the government invoked colonial-era laws to ban demonstrations, shut metro stations and deployed thousands of policemen to turn central Delhi into a citadel, defended by khaki-clad men with lathis, the iron-tipped bamboo staves also inherited, like the attitudes of the ministers and top bureaucrats, from former imperial overlords. Finally, after a week, Manmohan Singh, and Sonia Gandhi made brief televised speeches expressing concern and sympathy. The anger grew.

On December 25, X, still in Safdarjung hospital in the south of Delhi, began to lose her grip on life.

Four days later, X died in a clinic in Singapore, where she had been moved as no facilities for treatment that would even give her a chance of life existed in India. Her body was brought back to India, cremated in a public facility in Dwarka and then her ashes were carried by her family to the banks of the Ganges, near the village that Lakshmi Chand had left 30 years before, and scattered on the river.

The night of her death the angry protests that had been beaten back by riot police in central Delhi and the marches in other cities demanding security for women in India gave way to demonstrations of a different type. There was grief, even shame. At 7p.m., candles were lit across the vast country.

In Delhi itself, scores gathered at an impromptu shrine set up at the bus stop where X had waited for a lift home 13 days before. One poster read: "She is not dead, she has just gone to a place where there is no rape."

At the Jantar Mantar, an 18th-century observatory that is a traditional site of protests in the centre of the city, crowds gathered. X's death meant her attackers would now be charged with murder, and thus could face hanging. This became the cry that united the otherwise diverse and disorganised demonstrators. "Hanging them is not enough. They should be tortured like she was," said Srishdi Kumar, a 16-year-old schoolgirl. "Then maybe there will be a change. Why not?"

AFTER THE TRIAL

Nine months later, at the conclusion of the trial of her killers, it is difficult to argue that X's ordeal and death has made much difference in India, at least so far.

The fierce debate setting conservatives who blamed westernisation against liberals blaming reactionary sexist and patriarchal attitudes has faded. A package of laws increasing punishments for sexual assault and redefining a range of offences may do some good, campaigners concede, if enforcement is simultaneously improved, but dozens of men accused of rape remain members of local and national parliamentary assemblies. The special funding released by the government for measures to enhance the security of women has so far gone unspent. Few are confident that gender training for the underfunded police will have much effect. Nor are the new "fast-track courts" going solve the problems of the criminal justice system. "It is a few weeks of outrage against hundreds of years of tradition," M.J. Akbar, a veteran commentator, said. But this may not be so. The concern is that it is the change itself that is generating the violence.

The trial has now ended. Ram Singh hanged himself in his cell in Tihar prison in mid-March. The other four adults who have been convicted are likely to be hanged after all appeals are exhausted. Munna, the juvenile, may have to be released after three years' time in a juvenile reform home.

X's family has now moved to a new flat with running water, electricity and three bedrooms, a gift from the Delhi authorities. The family has also received "compensation payments," in the cold language of the bureaucrats, worth about Rs.30 lakhs, more than Lakshmi Chand could have ever hoped to have earned, let alone saved, in his working life. His sons are getting coveted government jobs. In a recent interview with The Guardian, he repeated one phrase: "I console myself by saying she was a good soul, set free in death."

Outside in the narrow street, a tanker had just arrived to deliver water. A crowd had formed and neighbours argued as they jostled with buckets. A motorbike clattered past. There was a short burst of music from a tinny radio. But the noise of a working-class Delhi neighbourhood barely reached the small basement flat where a 53-year-old man sat on his daughter's bed. " Guardian Newspapers Limited, 2013

(Jason Burke is http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/life-rape-and-death-in-an-indian-city/article5125290.ece?homepage=true

Bazigar thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
Mumbai gangrape: Why we need to move beyond selective outrage


Journalist, or specifically photo-journalist, raped in Mumbai, screamed the headlines. The next day, journalists of Mumbai hit the road, seeking justice. Their colleagues from Assam to Ahmedabad join the protest. I find it worrisome. Of course, every Indian should feel outraged at what happened at the Mahalaxmi mill. But did the victim pay for being a journalist? Would the lovers association of India, if there were such an organisation, hold protest rallies if it was a love-struck couple that was assaulted instead of two photo journalists? Would the medical or legal fraternity stage sit-ins unless a doctor or a lawyer is raped by a patient or a client?

We tend to hit the road only when one of our own is targeted. Now think back to the massive outrage at the brutal Delhi gang rape in December last year. That protest was mostly concerned about the safety of the urban middle class. Forget those lakhs of victims raped and assaulted all across the hinterland every day, did we ever bother to ask about the underclass in our big, bad cities? The domestic helps who consider it an occupational hazard, the street hawkers harassed for "hafta" and the homeless pavement dwellers picked up in the night by cops and ruffians alike? No, it takes a middle class victim in a middle class situation at a middle class hour to shake us, the middle class, up
.



In Mumbai, the professional identity of the young photo-journalist was incidental. She was not brutalised by the five men because they resented her job in general or her assignment in particular. She could be any woman, vulnerable at that point of time. Therefore, the protest by journalists only shows the discomfort of the privileged lot at not being beyond the grasp of criminals. Much like the insecurity of the Delhi middle class at the possibility of rape in a moving bus on a busy road at a busy hour.

Then again, the privileged " journalists, doctors, lawyers, the middle class " can hit the road and get noticed, on primetime television. What about those who can't even register their cases? Imagine the outcome of a group of tribals trying to rally in protest against routine sexual harassment they suffer in many parts of the country. Or the homeless or the slum dwellers in a metro agitating against nightly police excesses. They do not because they know they would be taken to task by the forces and no candlelight-happy media will guard them through the nights.


I raised this point in the aftermath of the Delhi gang rape last year and I am compelled to reiterate because the so-called national debate has changed nothing in our attitude since. Can we respect women in a system that does not respect anything but money and power? Can we make them feel safer in a predominantly violent society where men are not lesser victims? Unfortunately, the might of both money and power is relative and hence the outrage of the middle class or the more privileged sections of it (such as journalists).

Only some rapists are driven only by sex. More often, rape is a power statement. Men rape women who belong to' other men. Men rape women as punishment. Men rape women because they can. That is why most rapes happen within families. Strangers also rape and the startling majority of them belong to the armed forces and the militias. It has been going on in Kashmir, the North-East and along the red corridor from Bihar to Andhra Pradesh. And not only the armed forces, police and insurgents, feudal armies too run riot across the length and breadth of rural India.

Yet, our conscience is jolted only when she is brutalised in a Delhi bus or in a Mumbai mill. Yes, that something so brazen could happen in our big cities reflects the extent of lawlessness in the less governed parts of the country. But rape cannot be fought selectively. Women will never be safe if security is extended to one social class and not the other. When we vent our anger at the VIPs, when we raise slogans that the only women safe in Delhi are Sonia and Sheila, we forget that millions of rural or poor Indian women may well feel that safety is the sole entitlement of their well-to-do city counterparts.

Sentencing the Delhi bus or Mumbai mill rapists cannot bring the victims true justice if a thousand others continue to walk free across the country. The time, place and identity of the victim are only changing parameters that should not determine how we respond to rape. Every assault that goes unpunished anywhere is an encouragement to rapists everywhere. It is really all or nothing " no woman will ever really feel safe if another does not.

http://www.firstpost.com/india/mumbai-gangrape-why-we-need-to-move-beyond-selective-outrage-1060247.html?utm_source=ref_article
Edited by ramjaane - 12 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".