what are your thoughts??? is this fair? is the minister over reacting? or are catholics in India over reacting?? or are they both justified?
VANIs TRAUMA 13.2
INNER CONNECT 🤓 14.2
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026:M19: AUS vs ZIM, Colombo 🏏
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: M21: NED vs USA at Chennai🏏
Why is Karan doing so much ass-licking of Rani!!?
All 3 Mardaani films are successful :BOI. Rani holds record now!
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026:M20: CAN vs UAE, Delhi 🏏
Yrkkh is DEAD
Zee Cine Awards 2026 discussion thread- nominations out
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: M22: IRE vs Oman at Colombo🏏
Snippet of Feral Arjun Rawte
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: M23: ENG vs Scotland at Kolkata🏏
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: M24: SA vs NZ at Ahmedabad🏏
the more they overreact, the more controversy they create. the more controversy they create, the more popular the book becomes. kind of defeats the purpose they set out for in the first place.
T. ... It looks like the viscious cycle of poverty we study in economics.. the more we try to get out.. the more we get in😕😆 (dan brown must b very happy in the end😆)
T. ... It looks like the viscious cycle of poverty we study in economics.. the more we try to get out.. the more we get in😕😆 (dan brown must b very happy in the end😆)
eggjactly! 😆
dan brown is one happy camper. 😊
Originally posted by: Pradarshak
I think the IB minister is somewhat over-reacting. They are being too protective about minority's thoughts and views. But then on a second thought, I think they are to some extent right considering emotion and thoughts and beliefs of the people. If people just watch it as a creation of art like any normal movie then there should be no problem. But if it creates doubt in them that could be a problem. Because frankly speaking after watching closely I don't believe 100% of what is said in the book. It has been already proved there is no "Priory of Scion", it's a fake one. When something(true or false) stands up against the conventional belief it always creates waves and stirs up our minds.
u r rite...i guess if they are willing to show something like..." this is based on a work of ficiton and not fact and all characters are ficitonal and any coincidence is ..well ..coincidental etc etc etc..." should suffice right?? ai mean many movies have been made even before based on a historic fact but a fictionalised view of it.... actually critics have apparently crucified the movie and all this hullaballo will only serve to encourage people to watch it.....the easiest way to make a book a best seller is to ban it...i guess the same goes for movies too.