Is having kids PRACTICAL anymore?!!

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Bankim Chandra Chaterjee

@mr.ass

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: TheUltimate

Maybe (because I do not have any experience). That is not the point, though. Point is that marriage (a legal commitment) is more prone to create a stable family culture across the world. Family involves kids.

If not for kids, I can have n-number of live-in relationships(parallel or serial)... have multiple kids across cities or even countries. I guess you get the idea why I am saying that marriage is precursor to having kids.

yeah perhaps for ppl like you or me marriage will matter but some people have multiple families even though they're married.But yeah you cant be married to more than one I guess.

Quote

324284

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

#12

I wish some mexicans living on food stamps also throw their two cents on this topic. I dont know how they are able to produce kid after kid after kid till they reach the magical figure of "Half-dozen".

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Summer3

@Summer3

Trailblazer

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#13

Generally lower income groups tend to have larger families.
In some developed countries child grants are pretty attractive and having more kids is more profitable. Read some need not even work.

Quote

chocobear

@chocobear

Inactive

Posted: 13 years ago

#14

If our parents too thought like that, you and I won't have been here debating on this topic.

Yes having kids is practical. I think becoming parents is the most important part of your married life. Some couples do think that raising a kid is a very expensive thing so they just don't want to bring a child into their life but 10 years later they themselves would be craving for the kids and the sad part is they might not be physically capable of that.

Quote

Bankim Chandra Chaterjee

@mr.ass

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

#15

for me it'll be a waste of money :P but still, I love babies :D

Quote

return_to_hades

@return_to_hades

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 13 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: osama-bin-joe
for me it'll be a waste of money :P but still, I love babies :D

Get a baby pug, a lot more practical and adorable.

Quote

Bankim Chandra Chaterjee

@mr.ass

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

Get a baby pug, a lot more practical and adorable.

That's exactly what I want to do. I also would like to get a baby bullmastiff :-3 😳 ❤️

Quote

TheUltimate

@TheUltimate

Navigator

Posted: 13 years ago

#18

A baby pug is more adorable than a human child!

Wow! Can this thread spiral any further down?

I understand people disliking babies or thinking having babies is impractical. I am just appalled by the existence of those who compare human children to baby pugs. Sorry, not compare - they say baby pugs are more adorable!

Quote

blue-ice.

@blue-ice.

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 13 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: TheUltimate
A baby pug is more adorable than a human child!

Wow! Can this thread spiral any further down?

I understand people disliking babies or thinking having babies is impractical. I am just appalled by the existence of those who compare human children to baby pugs. Sorry, not compare - they say baby pugs are more adorable!

First of all...i don't see anyone saying that baby pugs are more adorable than human babies...but even if they said so...what is wrong in that...aren't the babies of all the species adorable...all babies are innocent and lovable...why should a human baby be superior to an animal baby...

In my opinion the animals are much more superior to the human species...they don't kill, lie, cheat for selfish motives...thats all that we humans do...in today's age...the kind of world we live in...its a disgrace to be a human being...i would rather be an animal...just my opinion...