Temples should allow non-Hindus, agree? - Page 9

Created

Last reply

Replies

132

Views

12k

Users

29

Likes

43

Frequent Posters

200467 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#81
Summer - did you read the article you posted on this page?
Summer3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#82

Originally posted by: Gauri_3

Summer - did you read the article you posted on this page?

Yes I read most of it. Religion is a good way to make money.
I read the way the marketing is done, sell to the believers.😲
We have several cases here in Singapore and so someone passed this to me.
there have been several prosecutions too, including religious persons and those heading charitable organizations. A kidnely foundation president even installed Gold Taps in his office and flew first class.
Those charity dinners we pay for bulk of the money goes to the so called marketing agents too.
200467 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#83

Originally posted by: Summer3

Yes I read most of it. Religion is a good way to make money.
I read the way the marketing is done, sell to the believers.😲
We have several cases here in Singapore and so someone passed this to me.
there have been several prosecutions too, including religious persons and those heading charitable organizations. A kidnely foundation president even installed Gold Taps in his office and flew first class.
Those charity dinners we pay for bulk of the money goes to the so called marketing agents too.

Thanks! I was looking for a quick summary or the gist.
I agree, most the worship places these days are more for business than the spirituality. At least this is how it works for the organizers or trustees. The visitors may be devotees or tourists but trustees are mostly interested in the money aspect of running the place. If I am not mistaken, if one pays a certain amount of money then they can beat the line and get darshan of the diety quickly. Pay some more and you get to be in front of the diety's statue for longer than other folks who did not pay. All this makes me question the validity of refusing entrance based on religion. What religion are we talking about here --- the religion of money?
Edited by Gauri_3 - 15 years ago
Summer3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#84

Originally posted by: Gauri_3

Thanks! I was looking for a quick summary or the gist.
I agree, most the worship places these days are more for business than the spirituality. At least this is how it works for the organizers or trustees. The visitors may be devotees or tourists but trustees are mostly interested in the money aspect of running the place. If I am not mistaken, if one pays a certain amount of money then they can beat the line and get darshan of the diety quickly. Pay some more and you get to be in front of the diety's statue for longer than other folks who did not pay. All this makes me question the validity of refusing entrance based on religion. What religion are we talking about here --- the religion of money?

Those that are too religious (or engrossed in something) often tend stop using their brains and are just too lazy to think or they are in some ways hypnotized or under a spell.
It is the same in love or gambling etc as one tends to get carred away.
Can be dangerous I realise .
We just have to wake up and be alert ! Young persons are very idealistic and impressionable. Kids follow religion and even desert their own parents. Now what religion teaches kids to desert their own parents !
441597 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#85

Originally posted by: souro


You have a home. You deny entry to all beggars and sales people. They would've wanted to get inside your home for 'spiritual, entertainment or aesthetic purposes'. They sue you for discrimination based on profession. Right?

yup, sure. for my home is mine (and my family's alone) and nobody gets in without permission.
but.....there lies the issue....TEMPLE IS NOT A PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND NEITHER SHOULD IT BE TRIED TO BE MADE INTO ONE! Brah!😉
200467 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#86

Originally posted by: Summer3

Those that are too religious (or engrossed in something) often tend stop using their brains and are just too lazy to think or they are in some ways hypnotized or under a spell.

It is the same in love or gambling etc as one tends to get carred away.
Can be dangerous I realise .
We just have to wake up and be alert ! Young persons are very idealistic and impressionable. Kids follow religion and even desert their own parents. Now what religion teaches kids to desert their own parents !

So true. We touched upon gambling in that MB thread too. Love😆 the less said the better. Worst is when someone's having a crush. Anyone who tries to talk sense to these lost souls seems like an enemy😆 Eventually, they do come back on track though. Too bad can't say this for the ones with blind faith in religion and brainwashed by religion.
Talking of religion - I also find the "tit for tat" attitude laughable. Most start their pleas with - other religions do that then why can't we do the same! They don't think twice before jumping at other religions for doing something they disagree with but would still use that rationale to base their case on😆
souro thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#87

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

yup, sure. for my home is mine (and my family's alone) and nobody gets in without permission.
but.....there lies the issue....TEMPLE IS NOT A PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND NEITHER SHOULD IT BE TRIED TO BE MADE INTO ONE! Brah!😉


Read the earlier posts again Krystal, it is a private property which the public use.
Still want to press charges for discrimination?
441597 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#88
ok...leave aside the legal stance, and view it from the moral and ethical angle, which i think this topic was intended for.
what on that?
souro thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#89

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

ok...leave aside the legal stance, and view it from the moral and ethical angle, which i think this topic was intended for.

what on that?


There is nothing ethically or morally wrong in what they have done. The rule is simple. You are a member of our organisation, please get inside. If you're not a member of our organisation and still want to get inside then please become a member first.

Does that sound terribly wrong in any way?

441597 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#90
race and religion is not practically equivalent to being a "member of an Organisation", if im not wrong. Religion, and spirituality are matters of the heart and soul and cannot be drawn parallels with any organized sect or anyhting of similar nature.

Related Topics

Debate Mansion Thumbnail

Posted by: fazgostoso

4 months ago

Should India and Pakistan agree to a ceasefire?

Trump just declared India and Pakistan agree to a ceasefire. Do you think it will last?

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".