'Physical Needs' - Can it be justified always? - Page 16

Originally posted by: cuckoocutter

i dont think ppl necessarily get more responsible with age. they only get dumped more responsibilities.

Originally posted by: karandel_2008

yes thats why better way to make someone moral is to first know what is morally correct and then teach the kids properly.

Regarding marriages, I think there must be already some statistics on marriages and Divorce. They should be easy to obtain for govt.

@crimson_sky: There are some statistics that I read (I will check if they are reliable enough). If people get married before 28 then there is a high chance of unhappy marriage and divorce. However starting from 28
the chances of stable marriages are good and the chance levels off after this age.

Originally posted by: cuckoocutter

even if ur statistics can be found, there wld be a simple explanation. after 28, the guy is more fat-cat in his job, so wifey aint leaving him even if he sucks (n most do with a fat belly n farty ways). 😆you need to look at quality of marriage too. teens may or may not end up divorcing, but fer the years they're married, it's the best thing ever. let's face it- after 28, the sex cant be that tempestuous as in teens when both partners r horny like hell. it's like our bollymovie heroines say, one impregnating nite can be enuff to give her lifetime of joy. girls can look fwd to those nites when the guy is a young stud, not when he's washed out after his job.😉😆

Originally posted by: cuckoocutter

also karandel, one hand you talk about west getting away from marrying, as if that's a good thing. now you're basing ur argument on things like stability of marriage, as if that is the key factor in relationships. how'll it be goin forward?😆

Originally posted by: karandel_2008

These days wifeys earn money as well so fat-cat reason may not apply. Fat-cat reason may apply to cases like Tiger woods etc.

Originally posted by: karandel_2008

Regarding my point about West: Lets not jump the gun 😉

I think the argument of @Chrimson_sky is that the age for marriage should be reduced to 14-15 etc.

Originally posted by: cuckoocutter

lol n wat was ur argument. 😆yeah, the west dont do marriage, so why even bother with that. but that's not what u got now, is it?😉😆

Originally posted by: cuckoocutter

women r still dependent on guy's earnings by n large, all kinds of stats fer that. so what they got goin after 28 is a kind of inter-dependency relationship. that might be a mutually beneficial arrangement, but it sure dont have to be soul-satisfying. that's no quality, it is what it is, an arrangement. like i said b4, it's like u clean the house, rear the kids, i get u the dosh. that's barter, a trade u put on coz u cant do better.😊