General Cricket Discussion Thread

First Previous

Page

105

Next Last

Frequent Posters

xROBINx

@xROBINx

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#441

Originally posted by: BeingBlunt
Talking like some conspiracy theorist rather than talking based on facts. 😛
Altough we all want srini to go, Its clear srini is not going anywhere. From Match fixing/betting the charge has come down to non action over fixers. There is a massive difference in both of these.

The Mudgal committee report on the IPL 2013 corruption scandal, presented to the Supreme Court of India, has laid out the misdemeanours of the "non-playing individuals" who were issued notices on Friday. The report says that of the four individuals, ICC chairman and sidelined BCCI president N Srinivasan was not found guilty of either betting or fixing, or of having tried to prevent the investigation into the scandal. However, the report does state that Srinivasan, along with four other BCCI officials, had full knowledge of an IPL player violating the IPL code of conduct, but took no action. The name of the player and the details of the IPL code of conduct violation are not yet specified.

The Mudgal report says that IPL chief operating officer Sundar Raman was had the contacts of a bookie and had contacted him eight times in a season. Of the other two individuals served Supreme Court notices, it has been established that Gurunath Meiyappan, who happens to be Srinivasan's son-in-law, was an official of the Chennai Super Kings franchise and had indulged in illegal betting.

Edited by -Robin- - 11 years ago

Quote

DhoniAddict

@BeingBlunt

Achiever

+ 33

WPL Wizzards

Posted: 11 years ago

#442

Originally posted by: -Robin-

The Mudgal committee report on the IPL 2013 corruption scandal, presented to the Supreme Court of India, has laid out the misdemeanours of the "non-playing individuals" who were issued notices on Friday. The report says that of the four individuals, ICC chairman and sidelined BCCI president N Srinivasan was not found guilty of either betting or fixing, or of having tried to prevent the investigation into the scandal. However, the report does state that Srinivasan, along with four other BCCI officials, had full knowledge of an IPL player violating the IPL code of conduct, but took no action. The name of the player and the details of the IPL code of conduct violation are not yet specified.
The Mudgal report says that IPL chief operating officer Sundar Raman was had the contacts of a bookie and had contacted him eight times in a season. Of the other two individuals served Supreme Court notices, it has been established that Gurunath Meiyappan, who happens to be Srinivasan's son-in-law, was an official of the Chennai Super Kings franchise and had indulged in illegal betting.

How does this prove srini's end is near? 😆I am talking only about srini. He has been completely cleared. The guilty party is meiyappan and sundar raman. This part of not taking action against criminals wont be anything in comparison to what he would have got if he was actually involved.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

xROBINx

@xROBINx

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#443

Originally posted by: BeingBlunt
How does this prove srini's end is near? 😆I am talking only about srini. He has been completely cleared. The guilty party is meiyappan and sundar raman. This part of not taking action against criminals wont be anything in comparison to what he would have got if he was actually involved.

He was never accused for fixing or betting. He tried to save meyyappan and this is comfirmed by this report

Quote

DhoniAddict

@BeingBlunt

Achiever

+ 33

WPL Wizzards

Posted: 11 years ago

#444

Originally posted by: -Robin-

He was never accused for fixing or betting. He tried to save meyyappan and this is comfirmed by this report

The Mudgal report has found ICC chairman and sidelined BCCI president N Srinivasan not guilty of either betting or fixing, or of having tried to prevent the investigation into the IPL 2013 corruption scandal. However, the report does state that Srinivasan, along with four other BCCI officials, knew about an IPL player violating the IPL code of conduct, but took no action. The name of the player and the details of the IPL code of conduct violation are not yet specified.

Quote

.Rohit

@.Rohit

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#445

Srinivasan knew about corruption but did not act ...

Quote

DhoniAddict

@BeingBlunt

Achiever

+ 33

WPL Wizzards

Posted: 11 years ago

#446

Originally posted by: _Rohit_
Srinivasan knew about corruption but did not act ...

Sorry but report mentions "Voilation of IPL code of conduct " not corruption.

Lets wait for the official judgement. 😛

Quote

.Rohit

@.Rohit

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#447

Forget it ... They should give final judgement now ... 😆

Quote

xROBINx

@xROBINx

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#448

Originally posted by: BeingBlunt
The Mudgal report has found ICC chairman and sidelined BCCI president N Srinivasan not guilty of either betting or fixing, or of having tried to prevent the investigation into the IPL 2013 corruption scandal. However, the report does state that Srinivasan, along with four other BCCI officials, knew about an IPL player violating the IPL code of conduct, but took no action. The name of the player and the details of the IPL code of conduct violation are not yet specified.

are yaar i am talking about meyyappan not player

The report says, "Investigations have confirmed that this individual [Gurnath Meiyappan] was a team official of a franchise. He was frequently meeting individual two [name withheld] in his hotel room. This strengthens the conclusion of the committee in its interim report dated February 10 that he was in close touch with individual two. The panel, however, held that no material was available on record to show Mr Meiyappan was involved in match-fixing. The finding about his betting activities and the finding that he was a team official stood confirmed.