Articles with discussions here - Page 30

Originally posted by: queenkumar

Thanks to Mrs. MIK for article, now we have the tru version...hmmmmm maybe BT knows something we dont! I guess only time will tell!

😆

I don't believe this article. There is definitely something fishy with it. Just like all the other articles you guys have fooled us with. Starting from honeymoon articles. 😆😆 😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by: JenRanbiir.K

So you think the TOI article is fake now?

All MIK articles from TOI must be fake then!

Hello?! MIK? It is a fan based site. Definitely, this article is fake. 😆😆

Originally posted by: queenkumar

Here is half page of the article, some say its fake, but its not!

Published in Bombay Times April 12th Page 12...Enjoy! 😳

That does not proof anything. Maybe those articles on the same page ... they are fake too. 😆😆😆

Originally posted by: Iqbalk fan

thanks queenkumar... why are there so many non fans here...increasing the pages!!😆

You should be glad. Giving attention to this not so active forum. 😆😉 Which you try so hard, but ... let my dots say the rest. Amen! 🤣

Originally posted by: Iqbalk fan

come on admit ,u google on him😆 u posted his article!!!?!?😕
we know who are flop actors and who arent!!😆😆😆

we know u watch cha and u r an iqbal fan deep within...awwww😳

Again ... when people try to be smart ... especially ... people like you ... I feel quite pitty for them. Get your facts right Miss. Maybe you have not noticed that it is an other user who posted that article. NOT ME. Then you wouldn't know that I even posted in that thread. If you don't believe ... check the time of my posts.

You see I'm not a phony nor a lier. I get my facts right, first then I say what I have to. Not like you.

I know it's hard for you to digest the real facts, that is why you open your mouth for nonsense. I mean I completely understand. Carry on. 😊