Aryan Khan Case Discussion ~For the People Who Want a Rationale Debate - Page 103

Bar & Bench:

ASG Anil Singh: Aryan Khan is a regular consumer of drugs. There is evidence to prove that he has been providing drugs.

Ye KIDS bhi na. bacche log doodh peete hai, gaanja nahi

ASG Anil Singh: They are arguing that we have not tested to find out about consumption. We are only arguing about possession. Aryan Khan was in conscious possession of drugs.

ASG Anil Singh: This case is about conscious possession and planning to consume.

ASG Anil Singh: Scheme of NDPS act. Section 29 does not say that the person has to be in possession.

ASG Anil Singh: When we apply Section 28 and 29 commercial quantity kicks in. He made an attempt to deal with commercial quantity.

ASG Anil Singh: Multiple drugs were found with all 8 people from all places on the same day. See the quantity and nature of drug.

Court: So, you are saying it is cumulative?

ASG: When I say conspiracy, when I calculate drugs of all persons, then it comes to that.

ASG: WhatsApp chats cannot be disputed because we have 65B statements.

ASG: It was a party. My learned friend is saying why we have arrested on October 2 on Gandhi Jayanti.. it is dry day we should have left them. (Laughs)

🤣

ASG: There are two other panchnamas of Munmun Dhamecha & Nupur and Mohak. The total drug quantity of ecstasy is commercial quantity.

ASG: There were variety of drugs and the cruise was two days. So, it cannot be that this as personal consumption. Because the quantity and the multiple drugs. This is why we have applied Sections 28, 29.

ASG Anil Singh: It cannot be a coincidence that so many people on the cruise, 8 were found with drugs and there was multiple varieties.

Bombay High Court: You are invoking 37 because of commercial quantity?

ASG: We are invoking because of 28 and 29. Their contention is the arrest memo does not have Section 28 and 29. But the first remand was four hours after arrest.

ASG: But even first remand has Section 28 and 29. The magistrate while granting remand considered 28 and 29. Rigours of 37 kicks in only because of 28 and 29.

"Only because of commercial"

😲

ASG: Supreme Court judgment says that drug menace is a more heinous crime than culpable homicide and has to be tackled stringently.

Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi: My friend is reading last para of Dhariwal’s judgment.

Bombay High Court: How does that Para open?

ASG: My learned friend relied on Tofan Singh, but it applies not at the stage of bail.

ASG is reading out Tofan Singh judgment: Now see judgment of Sahil Shah. It does not rely on Tofan singh.

Court: But this is 438 stage.

ASG: There are two judgements, but rest are bail. But the question is at what stage Tofan Singh will apply. It does not apply before trial.

Now that the whole cabal couldn’t remove Mr Wankhede from the case, I’m reading meme police is all geared up to try and arrest mr Wankhede …it is like rinse and repeat happening for the last one and half years or so…same police body same govt same harassment lol

No creativity in the very city of creativity

ASG is showing Ratan Malik judgment. In this case also person was not found in possession.

Still a person can be liable for offence. Look at Showik Chakraborty.

Originally posted by: Pr1yanka

Now that the whole cabal couldn’t remove Mr Wankhede from the case, I’m reading meme police is all geared up to try and arrest mr Wankhede …it is like rinse and repeat happening for the last one and half years or so…same police body same govt same harassment lol

No creativity in the very city of creativity

They couldn't remove Wankhede from this case. but getting script ready to arrest him on fake extortion allegations