Vishnu Parivaar #1 [Strictly IO] - Page 22

Created

Last reply

Replies

410

Views

10.1k

Users

9

Likes

537

Frequent Posters

PandavPranayini thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
@Sakhi- I do live😆 Can you see my siggie though?
@Janaki- Janaki, I agree word to word, then again, I have multiple opinions, lol. I know Nara-Narayana concept is authentic and even our Vaishnava culture believes that, but I don't. I depend on Lord and myself for knowledge. There is no reason in Vishnu-Vishnu being best friends, LMAO. Thus, Arjuna/Pandavas are Rudra-ansh and Krishna is Vishnu in my opinion. About Adishakti thing, I agree Tridevi together make Adishakti, but Yogamaya is Parvati, according to us. I agree with you in respecting other cultures though. And where did it mentioned that Draupadi never allowed other Pandavapatnis to Indraprastha? This is a made up story. You'll find in Vyasa's MB that before Vanvaas, other Pandavapatnis leave to their maternal kingdoms. So, it's a Folkstory. It's really very unfair if they didn't come to IP, I mean for one woman's sake, they all sacrifice their happiness lifelong? And Is Panchali that rock-hearted? That's it my rant😆
PandavPranayini thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
Double post 😕
Edited by KalyaniPanchali - 7 years ago
PandavPranayini thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
And, I have a question for you all 😛
We all know that Panchali emerged as a grown-up maiden. What's her age when she was born? 😆


And also people, Polyndry wasn't considered that inappropriate in that era, though was rare. ⭐Mahabharat made it too much đŸ„±
Seraphina231 thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
Wow, missed the debate here!
How are you guys? 😳
SriMaatangi thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
Sakhiyo😆 Yes, I can see the siggie😆
We have the same opinions.

I think Panchu was 12 *innocent* And polyandry was not uncommon either. I agree with the Panchali thing *more innocent*
PandavPranayini thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: Shrinika13

Wow, missed the debate here!

How are you guys? 😳


Hi Shre! How are you?

@Sakhi- Lol, I can't see it 😕 I also think she was 12 *innocent* and which Panchali thing? 😆
Seraphina231 thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: KalyaniPanchali


Hi Shre! How are you?

@Sakhi- Lol, I can't see it 😕 I also think she was 12 *innocent* and which Panchali thing? 😆

I am good. Youu?
You both 😆
PandavPranayini thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: Shrinika13

I am good. Youu?
You both 😆


I'm good too 😆
What's up?
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 7 years ago

Originally posted by: KrishnaPriyaa

Let's not argue about the Adi Parashakti thing. Agree to disagree?

Where did the Pandavas promise Draupadi that? Only Subuadrw navigating it is unfair to the other wives of the Pandavas, and shows partiality on everyone's part, which Krishna for sure didn't have. And neither did the Pandavas or Panchali. Panchali is the Patrani, yes. But she knew her Lords loved their other wives as much as they loved her. The promise seems to contradict her nature, to me.


Yup, agree to disagree, lol.

The epic doesn't explicitly mention the other wives, except for the known few, so I guess we can draw our own conclusions. Hidimbi lived with Ghatotkacha in the rakshasa kingdom, as Bheem had promised her that if he married her, he would only live with her long enough to bear a son and then he must leave. She agreed to that condition and abided by it. Uluchi was a Naga princess who had no interest in leaving her community to live among humans, so she lived in the Naga kingdom with her son Iravan. Chitrangada's story is very specific also. Her father made a condition that he would only let his daughter marry Arjuna if he agreed to let Chitrangada and Babruvahana remain in Manipur, as theirs was a matriarchal kingdom and Chitrangada was the future queen. Out of Arjuna's wives, only Subhadra returned with him to Indraprastha.

However, that doesn't necessarily mean the other wives of the Pandavas didn't come with them. Yudhisthir's wife Devika, Bhima's other wife Valandhara, and Nakula and Sahadeva's wives might've lived in Indraprastha, but not enough of them is known to say for sure. In fact, in one version it says Bhima married Valandhara after the Kurukshetra war.

Yeah, I do agree that the Pandavas' so-called promise to Draupadi seems a bit out of character for her and them, but they did promise that no matter how many wives there were, she would be Patrani of Indraprastha. She would be the empress, and none other. It's not because she was power hungry, but simply because she was the first wife and as Yudhisthir's wife, she was eligible to be empress, and was also the best person for the job due to her intelligence and knowledge in the shastras.

Regarding the other wives living in Indraprastha, this is the only reference I got when the Pandavas left Indraprastha for their exile. It says Indrasena (their famed charioteer) and others followed them with their wives and servants. We don't know if that means they're referring to the Pandavas' wives or the 'others' wives. It could mean anything, I guess.

"Vaisampayana said, 'Thus defeated at dice and incensed by the wicked sons of Dhritarashtra and their counsellors, the sons of Pritha set out from Hastinapura. And issuing through Vardhamana gate of the city, the Pandavas bearing their weapons and accompanied by Draupadi set out in a northernly direction. Indrasena and others, with servants numbering altogether fourteen, with their wives, followed them on swift cars. And the citizens learning of their departure became overwhelmed with sorrow, and began to censure Bhishma and Vidura and Drona and Gautama. And having met together they thus addressed one another fearlessly.
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 7 years ago
In general though, it was common for people to get married in that era but for women to still live in their fathers' homes. Vasudeva of the Yadavas was married to many women due to political reasons, but in the end only Devaki and Rohini lived with him, and only they bore his children. Many marriages were political alliances, for the sake of creating treaties between kingdoms. Some women went to live with their husbands, others didn't. It wasn't a case of fair/unfair, it was simply how it was in that era.

Related Topics

Chat Clubs Thumbnail

Posted by: radix

2 years ago

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".