The Reading Group-Invites ONLY- 2 |p.75, 144| - Page 117

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

74.6k

Users

9

Frequent Posters

Veritas thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: nitz17



Need any contribution???😉



Join in Nitzy ji😛
-Aladin- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: nitz17



Need any contribution???😉

Why not. 😉😆😆😆
For now, it looks like I'll need to format all the quotes again. I pm'ed the compilation last night to myself and Mohit ji, but looks like I can't copy paste it again (it doesn't show the quotes). Will be a few minutes. 😳😳
Incognit0 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: Veritas



I liked the premise of the book and the idea was quiet intriguing,but the ending kind of fell flat for me....May be because it was too realistic.I wanted some hope ..at least for MAureen



Nice Summary 😊


-Aladin- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

DISCUSSION ON POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by pinkisluv91

Originally posted by immunoblot

My first question for discussion is about political correctness. The book begins with a monologue by Martin, who explains his reasons for committing suicide; and likens it to going away to Sydney. He says: "Suicide was my Sydney. And I say that with no offence to the good people of Sydney intended."

A. Do you think, people of Sydney will be offended by such a statement. I think not! (Had it been, "Suicide was my new Delhi", I would not have sufficiently enraged.)
B. Does this seem like a routine approach that you'd follow... Say something, and then suggest that no offence was intended? Is this a universal trait, or is this something typically British (which is what the book stereotypes!)
C. Would a desi protagonist do the same (care about political correctness)?


A. hmm maybe it could be offensive since suicide isn't a good thing and him comparing it to Sydney makes the city seem like a bad place. But the no offense part tells the people to take no offense. :))

B. I do that at times, but just so I don't make people mad and to let them know it's my personal opinion.

C. I think even a desi would do that:) Why not?


Well, suicide isn't a good thing; but in the place this sentence comes, he is saying that committing suicide is just like moving to another place. Sydney was just an example of the other place that he could move to; and honestly, if I were to write that passage, as a desi, I'd not bother about causing offense to anybody in Sydney.

Besides, I am certain that most desis are not politically correct... it is just our character to bristle at any percieved slights; but as a social system, we are totally non-PC...
For instance, there was an Indian postdoc in the neighbouring lab... they also had an African grad student in their lab; and while talking to me, this postdoc would often call this grad student "kaali"... and I know that many desis wouldn't think twice before doing something like this... that is the hallmark of our non-PC character...
Originally posted by axeion

General desi population is racist and has so many hypocrites 😡
I have come across many racists on this forum too...They are very good ppl as such, but just a bit racist though they don't mean any harm.
Coming back being PC, I don't know. U see I am not that good at analysing ppl. All I know is I have come across many weirdos
Originally posted by nitz17


Desi's are the most offensive when it comes to racism and that doesn't just end in international level; but national, state and regional level too. Our only saving grace is that we speak languages/dialect that not understood by others. I had a Indian classmate in grad school, she thought Americans are culture less coz according to her culture was being draped in clothes, not calling professors by their names and not having live-in and she was very offensive about it. I failed to make her understand that it is part of their culture... 😕. And yes, all desis in my school used to call African-Americans 'babban log'.

Will get back later after reading a few pages
Ciao
Originally posted by Veritas

Ok ..I don't get this.
Even after traveling all this way..people still stick to these constraints and stupid notions.
And I agree Indians are the most racist not to mention castewadi too .
Until the time I was in India..I was against reservation and thought the whole idea of caste was overblown.
But now I am for reservations 100 %.
I saw casteism the first time after I came to the US.Can you believe that.
For people who have grown up in Delhi ,Bombay or other metro cities or for that matter kids of displaced parents it is not such a big deal.
But there are people who come from one state /region/language and have not had the opportunity to live and understand ,adapt or interact with other cultures.They stick to these notions of superiority and how their beliefs are better than others.
Originally posted by -Aladin-

**Keep in mind that I have not yet read a single page of the book** (tries to look ashamed and fails miserably) 😳😳😆😆😆
A. The idea is not offending, but it may to be to the sensitive people in Sydney. If someone says going to heaven is like going to Sydney, it would please the people of Sydney, but if the idea is moving to hell is like going to Sydney, then it can be offending. I expect it would differ from person to person, however, I would not be offended by such statements, because there are always good people and bad people in any country. Another fact is that criticism usually just bounces off of me. 😳😳😆😆
B. If I want to offend people, then I would generally phrase it 'if it offends someone, then so be it'. 😆😆 I think I am politically correct, but only to a certain degree. Most desis are not politically correct though. We say the meanest things, without realizing what we are actually saying and when people say the same things about us, we tend to take a lot of offense. I'll use the example of black people. While we use discriminatory terms for them, it's all good, but when someone generalizes us in the same way, we don't take it kindly. However, it would be wrong on my part to only blame the desis. I believe it is quite a universal trait. I have come across some white folks (again a discrimatory term) who are the same way. The most tolerant people I have found is the "black" community, believe it or not. 😳😃😃
C. I don't think a desi protagonist (in general) would care.
(If I have offended someone, then it was not my intention.) 😳😳😉 **pun intended**
Originally posted by immunoblot

Yeah... the prejudice does run deep in our collective mentalities... That is the problem... And so often, we don't even try to mask it.
And then we are also complain about political correctness (this is a universal trait; everybody complains about PC-ness, Martin does too: He says that in Sydney there will be no left-wing councils banning 'Baa-Baa Black Sheep'), we desis have mostly benefitted from the PC-West... and have made no efforts to correct our behaviour either at home, or abroad... instead by frowning upon it, we have found some sort of moral justification...

Sad part: Coming back to the book, the first page outlines Martin to have a conflict-ridden personality... So, disdainful of PC-ness; and yet so PC...
Would we desis be better at trying to emulate this attitude? At least by saying things that sound correct, can we somehow lessen the guilt of thinking/doing what is wrong?
Originally posted by -Aladin-

I think deep down we all know where we are hurting someone's sentiments. It's a simple matter of putting ourselves in other people's shoes (not literally). If you won't like something that is said about you, then you shouldn't say the same about others. Most people though, make such statements in their full senses and with the purpose of spiting the other party. It's just how it is. It's a bit sad. Then people wonder why is their so little tolerance? Rather ironic, isn't it.
This is exactly why, I don't believe in extreme views (especially the negative). All humans are created by God. Yet, to date we make fun of people who may not resemble us. As a child, my mom would reprimand us for making fun of other people's facial features even. She says, God created that person a certain way. How could you even make fun of them. Yet, people don't think twice before painting other people in a negative way. Many of my friends are the same, but I mostly ignore them. If I reprimand them, then apparently, I am taking away their rights to 'freedom of speech'. It's a double edged sword, isn't it.
Originally posted by Veritas


I believe Being a public personality has forced Martin to be PC.
He does it inadvertently...because he got trained over years.
He knows everything he says or does is news for the tabloids and can be misconstrued /misquoted and milked by news hounds
About the Sydney comment..It says something about the political climate prevalent in Britain..They do try very hard not to offend.
Originally posted by Veritas

Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by Veritas

About the Sydney comment..It says something about the political climate prevalent in Britain..They do try very hard not to offend.

I agree with what you say about Martin...

But this thing about the British trying hard to not offend, and openly confront... is this a good sign? Should desis also try to emulate that?? Will we become better people, or will it lessen our stature in society if we stop excluding/demeaning people??

I don't know Blot ji.,I guess its contextual.
But then who gets to decide what is right or wrong.
For example take the Burqa debate.
I thought people should be free to decide what they want to wear.
But people go overboard too ...I cite the recent case in high court ..where a woman did not want to take off her burqa for voter registration card photo.
Which is such a ridiculous argument.How would the election officials identify a person if they are veiled....And the judge said as much and said ..she had the choice to not vote or take off her veil.

Ultimately the muslim law board had to intervene and they said"going for haj is a religious requirement...for that you need a passport...which requires a photograph.
So the woman shouldn't have an issue with her photograph on the voter registration card.

I think there was something very frivolous about this whole argument.
Originally posted by Veritas

Originally posted by immunoblot


Everybody does this... I read a social commentary, according to which, this is what makes us stronger. When we exclude people on whatever bases, we assume a higher position; and strengthen the social order... 😳

I don't know about that,don't we elevate religion above everything else .
again it differs from person to person.
I think somehow prejudice is ingrained within us.We are trained from childhood..and we learn by noticing things around us...we just don't know better.It is like a reflex action.
So it has to be unlearned like everything else.
Black neighborhoods are supposedly "unsafe" in the US.
Does that mean I look with suspicion at all African Americans..no.
But I wouldn't live in those neighborhoods either
Originally posted by -Aladin-

Exactly Smita ji. See the thing about prejudices is that sometimes they are not far from reality. All five fingers are not equal though. We have the good and bad people among all societies. Some in greater numbers than the others.
I don't know about elevating one's social status. If I think 'negative' about someone, then it certainly is not with the thought that I am better than them.
@ bold: I quite agree. It's such an ingrained quality, that I doubt we can unlearn it.
Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by -Aladin-

Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by -Aladin-

Some desis would often misguide you too over here. My dad often says, 'yahan pe aa ke dimaagh kharaab ho jaata hai'. 😆😆😆

LOL... I do that too... Even if I don't know the raasta, I still give very elaborate and genuine-sounding directions... 😛😆😆 (I do that even here in DE! 😛)
No, I wasn't just talking about raasta. Wo to chooti baat hai.
When my parents came here, they had to write their exams to update their degrees, but everyone gave them wrong advise on purpose. Everyone asks my dad, out of all his friends, because he's the only one who always give genuine advise. 😃😃 My dad tells us the same. Deni hai to sahi advise do, aur nahin dena chahte, to mat do. Why would you misguide others? 😕😕

Haan, wrong advice is a bad thing...
The thing with the raasta is that I can't say "no" to people... they ask me where something is, and I say "yes!"... and I proceed to tell them where it could be... *bad habit smiley.
Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by pinkisluv91


I think I have never observed that Indian people aren't PC😕, or maybe it's because I live in a non-indian neighborhood. But I would probably care about the people(maybe that's just me personally) esp if I was writing a book.
So he called her kaali but only you understood right? Isn't that still politically correct? I mean if he said black to her that would be incorrect, or is it incorrect regardless? I'm confused😕. Because if that's true then no one is politically correct. Everyone uses terms like that.🤔 Everyone I have come across calls African Americans black.
Omg 12 pages of prejudice and Politically correct people 😆, I missed out on a lot:((


Pinki! 🤗 We were missing you...

No it isn't PC, if you use a pejorative term for an individual in the presence of people who disapprove of that, then it is non-PC...

You have see the merits of every person... This grad student in question is one of the most patient people I have ever come across in my life (and that is saying quite a lot)... I honestly felt bad when this stupid woman called repeatedly called her "kaali"... It was almost as if that girl doesn't have a name, or doesn't have anything else to distinguish her, except for her skin colour.

And with us desis, the gora-kala is one thing, the Gujju-Bengali another, and let us not even talk about castes. Political correctness would be when you are egalitarian and consider every person to be worthy. And would have a view-point which doesn't offend anyone. (Like Martin in the book, he completes his tirade with stating that he intends no offense to the people of Sydney!) Most desi people will barely reach that level...
Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by pinkisluv91


I missed you guys too and a lot of pages😆

Well that's bad if she repeatedly said it. 😕 Did you know that girls name, did she? 😆

Gora-kaala is bad only if it's meant in a bad way, we use those at home just to talk abt someone whose name we don't know😆 to describe them. I didn't know abt the gujju-bengali😕. I hate the caste system, it's too much. Do you think it's possible to have a viewpoint that wouldn't offend anyone? I don't think anyone can reach that level. Once I called a local police station and they asked me if the person I was talking abt was white or black instead of being PC and saying Caucasian or African American, I was going to correct her😕😆


Of course, we know her name Pinki... She works with us... 😆😆😆
And, it is different... in France for instance, the government establishment is colour-blind. It is prohibited to say white-black, etc... The police posters are also printed with terms like "dark complexion" instead... It depends from place to place, I'd say...

In India, it is terrible... last year, there was a news piece highlighting the troubles of African students... Apparently they all understood what "kaaliya" means...
I imagined, if people called me anything like that, I'd be very unhappy about it... I wouldn't mind if neutral words are used... that is definitely possible... You can use words like "African/Indian/European descent" for instance... that wouldn't be offensive. Or, if you are working with a person, it would be best to ask his/her name and use it instead...
Originally posted by Veritas


Blot ji Indians are worst of the lot...I have a friend who is from UP.She is a little dark complexioned,but she was really insecure about it.....Her older sister is quiet fair(and there was alot of comparision).I went to her home for a party and some of her relatives were there.
They were congratulating her mom saying :Acha hua apne apni choti beti ko engineer bana diya warna iske rang ki wajah se kaun shadi karta".
somehow in India its ok to disparage someone because of their color/caste/religion

Psst: this is what got me interested in"sapna babul ka..."
Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by nitz17

Originally posted by immunoblot


Two/three weeks ago, I had my holiday and was so bored that I decided to clean the pebbles from the sidewalks to kill the time... and while everybody who passed by gave my such plesant looks, the desis were simply obnoxious...
There was one older guy, perhaps the father of another student, who commented to her daughter(?): yahaan aakar yeh log sadakon par jhaadu lagaane ko bhi taiyyar hain... I wanted to say something really rude to them, but by the time I could think up with a suitable come-back line, they were already gone quite some distance away...

This only reminded me that such people are even worse than the assorted xenophboes we might see in the countries that we live in... they hate even their own kind...

LOL... (highlighted sentence) it's like antonym of Live and let others live.

Yeah... exactly... and I'm not even making a livelihood by lagaoing jhaadu... Not that there is anything wrong with it...
And I can quite imagine how the desis were jeering... When I was new in DE, I got to know that there are two groups of the desi students at the Uni... one believed in Mata Anandamayi, the other did not. I was expected to take sides...

Anyhoo... I guess we are ready to conclude that desis lack a basic sense of PC-ness (mostly), even though Aladin ji had some lovely experiences with other desi people. In the context of the story, the British people (and the anglophone first world countries in general) have a social order which respects this PC-ness...
(The whole discussion was kinda pointless actually, but I am ready with my second question... which I will write soon.)
Originally posted by RainbowWarrior

I've always wanted to go to Australia so I found this line really funny from Martin
"Suicide was my Sydney"
I'll take the plane, thank you very much 😃

A. People of Sydney seem to be very fickle these days and might well be offended by anything (and simply blame it on the Indians 🤢) It all depends on the colour of the party trying to offend, unfortunately.

B. Pretty universal I'd say, I've used it myself occasionally but it's not the best practice in extreme. Think of all the hyperventilating (psycho) super patriotic Americans who plant an American flag in one hand and go about wiping out huge masses of the world population with the other, all in the name of 'homeland security', 'fight on terror', 'dancing with wolves 😉' etc. You can't question them 'cos they mean you no harm, they are only protecting their own people, none of whom live in Iraq or Afghanistan 🤔

C. hmmm... desi eh? The second hero (side kick) does it all the time in hindi films.

Side hero (short chubby guy with day old stubble on his chin, wearing un-tucked non-designer checked shirts over very baggy jeans and 80's loafers and a blue baseball cap turned backwards): Dekh, tu bura mat maan na, mai bus keh raha ho, mai galat bhi ho sakta hoon, mujhe mat peetna ok... but mujhe woh teri type ki nahi lag rahi hai

Hero (tall well-built, almost good looking but the hair style is rubbish, wearing designer clothes to the t, shades, rolex, no socks in sneakers and carries a torn up wallet with no money inside... the director paid for the clothes you see, but the hero is actually a poor guy in the film): Aye! Kya bol raha hai? Tujhe maaronga ab... woh toh mujh se hi shaadi karegi.

😆
Originally posted by RainbowWarrior


And this would be proof 1056 for me not being a 'desi'. I've known this a long long time now..

I've spent too long of my adolescent years calling people 'bubble head' and 'lizard feet' (which only made folks laugh). Even now, I use these names as opposed to proper(?) offensive words. I don't know if it makes me politically correct but it's more fun and keeps any ill spirit out of the conversation and out of my head 😊 So, I'm non-PC but still am PC, 'cos I cause no offense and hence I'm non-desi.. the non-desi theory is hence proved 😆
Originally posted by nitz17

Earlier convicts were marooned on Australia and one place being New South Wales where Sydney is located. So he might be thinking that suicide was like marooning himself to another place like Sydney (his Sydney). These are just my thoughts Embarrassed

A.
i am not from New Delhi but just stayed 3 days but from my experience I wouldn't get offended. Even if someone said 'Suicide was my Bangalore' I wouldn't get offended either 😛

B. It's not just British but everywhere it is the same. I suppose, since the writer is British he thinks it happens only in Britain

C. Even today's movies have the main characters running away from dark people/hermaphrodites who approach them thinking they are beautiful from back side. So no.... they dont even make an attempt to be politically correct.. I even wonder whether many Indians know what PC means....
Edited by -Aladin- - 15 years ago
-Aladin- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
DISCUSSION ON SUICIDE
Originally posted by Veritas

Originally posted by immunoblot

This is how the second protagonist is introduced:
Maureen is very religious and has been contemplating suicide. Of course, she has a very sad life, and suicide will liberate her, but she is confused about the diktat of religion regarding suicide. The following passage sums up the dilemma:

If you spend day and night looking after a sick child, there's very little room for sin, and I hadn't done anything worth confessing for donkey's years. And I went from that, to sinning so terribly that I couldn't even talk to the priest, because I was going to go on sinning and sinning until the day I died, when I would commit the biggest sin of all. (And why is it the biggest sin of all? All your life you're told that you'll be going to this marvellous place when you pass on. And the one thing you can do to get you there a bit quicker is something that stops you getting there at all. Oh, I can see that it's a kind of queue-jumping. But if someone jumps the queue at the Post Office, people tut. Or sometimes they say, 'Excuse me, I was here first.' They don't say, 'You will be consumed by hellfire for all eternity.' That would be a bit strong.)

A. Does she have a valid reason for suicide?
B. If you say "no", because suicide is not the answer to life's problems; then tell me: Is it worth living a hopelessly horrible life?
C. What sort of feelings do you have for this poor, sad soul?
(People who haven't read the book can also answer, of course!)

She shouldn't have been forced to lead that kind of a life.
I would blame religion for this.
It is easy to preach but difficult to follow.
And I am pro choice...may be it is controversial to say this but Matty should have been allowed to die with dignity too..since he could not make that choice for himself.
and then Maureen wouldn't have had to think about killing herself.
Originally posted by Veritas

Originally posted by immunoblot


I didn't think about Matty being allowed to die a dignified death... but you do realize Smita ji, that is like negative eugenics?? It isn't just a matter of religion, but also something that is sensitive for poltical, historical and sociological reasons (even if one ignores the religious component!)...

I agree with what you say though: Matty's father walked out on them, and Maureen shouldn't have to bear the burden of a spastic child alone... She'd probably have led a healthier/happier life had it not been for Matty; and yet she loves him (which is evident throughout the book!)...

I don't understand why religion prohibits suicide... What is the justification? What is the purpose of this diktat??

Religion prohibits a lot of things Blot ji..but that does not mean it is always right.
Cathoilics are against contraception and use of condoms,hindus had the practice of untouchability and sati...what about circumcision in Muslims and jews...there are so many more examples.
If there was a way Maureen could have known about Matty's condition before birth she should have had the right to abort.And about Matty...do we know whether he is in pain..is there any brain activity...can he understand emotions...does he know what is happening around him.....We do know his breathing was labored.
If an animal is in pain we don't think twice before putting it to sleep,we know it is the right thing to do.But it becomes different for humans somehow.

I know It is a dangerous argument..in a way Hitler misused it..he said jews were vermin and needed to be exterminated.
The answer lies in "who gets to decide?"

Originally posted by Veritas

Originally posted by immunoblot


Of course, religion has it wrong. And the real question is "who gets to decide?"

There is rampant female foeticide in India. Imagine, if people get the ability to determine the sexual orientation of their children before birth, there will be the foeticide of unborn homosexuals too... which is also not fair.

So, for the sake of an argument, doesn't it seem better then that eugenics is not allowed any space in our society. On one extreme we have India with a skewed sex ratio, on the other, we have countries which will prolong the suffering of a spastic individual. (Seeing the evil in the misuse of the choice, I only favour unbiased choice...)

For Maureen's sake, I'd however just want to get Matty institutionalized... She is obviously not able to handle the burden...

But for that she needs money...its a vicious circle.
Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by pinkisluv91

Originally posted by immunoblot


A. Does she have a valid reason for suicide?
B. If you say "no", because suicide is not the answer to life's problems; then tell me: Is it worth living a hopelessly horrible life?
C. What sort of feelings do you have for this poor, sad soul?
(People who haven't read the book can also answer, of course!)

A. No one has a valid reason for suicide ever. No reason is good enough to end your life.
B. Yes it is worth living a horrible life, you have to be positive and wait for a better future. Negativity would be the cause of the thought of suicide.
C. I haven't read the book yet but I would say that I feel bad for her especially since she thinks her life isn't worth living. Life is beautiful:))


Read the book, Pinki... As her story builds up, you'll see the pain that she goes through. Smita ji and I were discussing over scraps that Maureen is probably the only one (amongst the four) who has a genuine reason to kill herself...

This is one instance, actually where her faith in religion has perhaps sustained her... I'd say, if there was no church, and she had to care for her spastic son, without ANYTHING else in her life, she'd probably have wanted to kill herself earlier...
Originally posted by pinkisluv91


Okay back to the book, I think people should be given the right to die only in extreme conditions. I couldn't watch a loved one suffer for long anyways, it's artificial life anyways. Why keep them alive on a machine?
Originally posted by Veritas


Charles Caleb Colton quotes
Suicide sometimes proceeds from cowardice, but not always; for cowardice sometimes prevents it; since as many live because they are afraid to die, as die because they are afraid to live"
"Suicide is man's way of telling God, "You can't fire me - I quit."" Bill Maher quotes
Originally posted by RainbowWarrior



A. There is no valid reason for suicide at all. Suicide is invalid.

B. Firstly, life is not a question but if you want to look it that way then it's more like an exam with many questions with varying degrees of difficulty and scores allotted. There can't be one answer to many questions. If you write down the same answer for every question in an exam, you will most likely fail. Suicide is not an answer, it's an end.

For every person who think's their life is horrible, need's only to look at a person who's life is more horrible then their own. There are single parents in this world who are taking care of 2 or more disabled children who don't even know that their caring giver is their mother or father and couldn't care less. Is their life horrible? Should they kill themselves and leave their children to a 'home'?

Life is not about having the best of everything, but making the best of what we have.

C. Maureen loves her kid but her belief is wavering. She needs to look within and ask herself why she took care of her child for so long and why she no longer wants to. Did she have unreal expectations with regard to her efforts?
I need to read more to find out but right now I side with the child because he has no choice to where he's headed while Maureen does. It may be the right choice for her (now) but it's selfish and cowardly.
Originally posted by immunoblot


If you are talkng about the race-motivated attacks on Indians, then I'm sure that there is another side to it. From ahat I have seen of them, the people from Australia/Newzealand are really nice and easy going...

It is quite universal, globally; but with many desis, many things won't register as offensive and no addotional qualifying statements will be made... For instance, we discussed the matter about skin colour... apparently stuff like "tumhari shaadi nahin hogi, because you are dark", is an acceptable social more.
Originally posted by immunoblot


This is like a jingoistic statement. I wouldn't want anybodfy known to me going down that way (not even the folks I dislike here on IF😛)... but people might have their reasons, and we can't apply a universal statement like "suicide is invalid" at all times...

Yeah... you are absolutely correct... but a person is led to suicide only because of he/she is hopelessly drawn to it. It ultimately boils down to personality/upbringing... (In the book, Maureen is the matron in the group. When they have their intervention, she is the only one left behind while all the others storm out; and she is always seen as upholding a pious spirit. I'm sure, if such people find the support-system in their life, they can find their inclination to live; but until Maureen goes to the roof-top to kill herself, she doesn't meet anyone who'd care(?) and so, imagining that that poor woman has done nothing else except for spending all the years talking to a child who can't even understand what she is saying, I also see the reason why she would want to end it all. She has nobody to admire her character and personality; she feels trapped and lonely; and suicide seems to be a way to put an end to it.)
RW, you will have to conceded at least some merit to her choice...

It is selfish, but it isn't cowardly... She has experienced a hard life for very long and she wants it to change. The only sad part is that she is so despondent that she can't see any other alternatives.
Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by RainbowWarrior

Originally posted by immunoblot

But, let us come back to the book: What do people think about the right to die?! 😃


Can I answer with a question?

Is there a right to birth? Does anyone here remember being asked by their parents if they wanted to be born?

There is no right to die. Life has been given to us and it will be taken away. Why would we have a say in one and not the other?

We the people, of this earth, gather around us all forms of worldly possessions, but forget the ultimate inevitability. We come in this world alone with nothing to our name and that is exactly how we leave.

Exit stage left.

Only exception being, folks living on machines. If the machine is doing everything to keep them alive and the learned medical folks are certain that there is no life there, then switching off said machine would be the best course forward. Of course, there are people who started to breathe on their own when this was done and did not die. Can we really decide when a person dies?

RW, I agree with what you say. but for the sake of a discussion, I ask this:
So, folks living on a machine may be killed? Then, what about folks who feel that a metaphorical machines (their hearts which pump their blood, or their children who need them, usw...) are the only things keeping them alive?

This was going to be my next question. Martin says that people who want to commit suicide have a genuine reason to do so...

Not once did I read a newspaper report which convinced me that the deceased was off the old trolley. You know: 'The Manchester United forward, who was engaged to the current Miss Sweden, had recently achieved a unique Double: he is the only man ever to have won the FA Cup and an Oscar for Best Actor in the same year. The rights to his first novel had just been bought for an undisclosed sum by Steven Spielberg. He was found hanging from a beam in his stables by a member of his staff.' Now, I've never seen a coroner's report like that, but if there were cases in which happy, successful, talented people took their own lives, one could safely come to the conclusion that the old balance was indeed wonky...


I think, I agree with him too... There are people who commit suicide, but by calling them cowards we aren't doing them justice. For all one knows, it could be this sort of judgmentalism that could be the reason why those people felt like they needed to take the plunge in the first place.
I also think that a better approach would be to follow the principle: "Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle." (Look, who's talking?! 😛)
Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by RainbowWarrior


Killed?!! Taking a brain dead patient off their life support machine is murder? But they are dead right (according to the docs), the machine is only doing what their brain is not telling their hearts to do, or similar. Without the machines, they die on their own or continue breathing on their own. That's not killing, just nature taking it's own course. Just to be clear, I'm not for euthanasia (mercy killing), that is uhh.. 'killing'.

I'm not saying I wouldn't be kind to a person who has considering suicide. Of course I would be. I know too many people personally who have made attempts and I haven't said 'coward' to any of their faces and I don't think they are, but they did give up at some stage of their lives.
They are still here though and I know it's made them stronger, but no one needs to read book (say this one), sympathise with the characters, equate their own situations to the ones in the book, and go jump off a cliff, right? Regardless the situation, suicide is not cool. I can sympathise, advise and help only while the person is still alive.

There are merits in both directions. Euthanasia is justified too. It is kinder to alleviate the suffering of a person who is bound to die. Don't you think??

@Suicide: I agree that suicide is not cool. And if you read the book, you'll see that the book doesn't support the idea as well... There is hope for everyone. And since you know people who have attempted suicide, you'd appreciate better than me how people can go down that road.
For Maureen (and not for the other three), I see the reason why she wants to kill herself and feel sorry for her. (She has a valid reason, the others don't.)
This was the matter that I wanted to discuss... and not to have a real discussion about whether suicide is good/bad. (It is bad, of course.)
Originally posted by Veritas

Originally posted by nitz17

Ok I just finished the book and all the time I was remembering two people who were trying to take their life under 2 dif circumstances.

One was my cousin who was very much older to me. I was 6 when he died and was almost 10 yrs older. He was suffering from some kind of malignant tumor on his right neck and even the strongest painkiller couldn't numb his pain. He was operated twice but the tumor was back. He could no longer bear the pain in his stiff neck, and tried to kill himself twice but was saved. He died three months later, his parents were out of money and couldn't even afford for their other 2 children's education.

Other one was my friend who used to live a block away from my house who was very nave and docile. She was in love with a guy who belonged to her religion/caste/sector whatever but the guy wasn't as rich as my friend so her mom rejected him. The harder she tried to convince her mom the sturdier she became and threatened her that the whole family would commit suicide if she set chose that guy. In that intense moment she attempted but thankfully her brother saved her. Later she got married to the guy her mom chose her and got divorced too coz her mom found out that their family was suffering from some kind of hereditary disease. She has a kid, her bf was killed in an accident (??) the day she got married and she also has shunned all her friends. Now she says she is alive to take care of her 2 yr old son.

I just wanted to share it coz I couldn't take it off my mind 😔.



These are really painful Nitz ji,and I wouldn't blame your cousin for what he did.This is going to be controversial again ..but I am all for euthanasia atleast for terminally ill patients or people who are brain dead.
I won't judge someone who wishes to die...because I don't know the pain they are going through.
I know a lady who cared for her sister who had terminal cancer.
The day her sister died she helped the nurse wash her sister...and her ass just fell off.
Those diseases they rot you from inside,I can't imagine the pain these people go through and won't wish it on my worst enemy .
abt the second incident, that girl is scarred for life and nothing her mother could do to help her.
Another strike against prejudice.😔

Originally posted by nitz17

@Topic'

They speak about attempting for suicide so openly in public and media, but yet there are no legal actions taken. I thought there was some kind of rehabs for them. Do you have to hurt yourself physically to go to rehab?

Originally posted by immunoblot

They didn't technically attempt suicide... All they did was to go to the roof-top, and return...
I believe that until you put yourself in physical danger, it cannot be considered a suicide attempt...
Originally posted by -Aladin-

Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by -Aladin-

Hmm, I see the general premises, but IMO, killing oneself is not justified. There are so many people who are in much worse conditions, in the world. So my sympathies are usually limited. 😳😳

And yet that is what such people need most. Irony. 😳
I'm not that heartless. I would comfort them, but I'd also probably remind them that there are so many unfortunate souls in the world. If they can go on and fight back, why can't they? It's hard for me to empathize with them completely because they do have their health. There are so many people in the world who don't have the basic necessities in life, yet they do go on in life and their struggle.
We can all find the most minor of excuses to be unhappy in life. I'm sure we all have ups and downs in our lives, but most of the time, I don't see any justification for suicide, unless in extreme cases.
Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by -Aladin-

I'm not that heartless. I would comfort them, but I'd also probably remind them that there are so many unfortunate souls in the world. If they can go on and fight back, why can't they? It's hard for me to empathize with them completely because they do have their health. There are so many people in the world who don't have the basic necessities in life, yet they do go on in life and their struggle.
We can all find the most minor of excuses to be unhappy in life. I'm sure we all have ups and downs in our lives, but most of the time, I don't see any justification for suicide, unless in extreme cases.

Yeah... now this is subjective: How extreme is extreme?

One can never say... people are individualistic... they all have different threshholds...

BTW... the 4 people don't actually kill themseleves... They meet again on the high-rise on 14.02... exactly 6 weeks after they originally planned to kill themselves... see another guy who jumps down, and decide that they probably don't have "that" urge anymore...
Nobody kills temselves eventually... so any talk about who should/shouldn't kill him/herself is not really necessary... 😃
Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by -Aladin-

See, that can be used to justify any and all situations. Nobody would be wrong in the world, then. It would depend from person to person.

We do decide what our threshold is though. There are people who have everything in the world and yet continue to be unhappy and there are people who have nothing in the world and can still find happiness in the smallest of things. We are rather ungrateful, aren't we, in that case? We only remember God when things go our way but are rather resentful when they don't. I have found this to be a general trend, though. 😳😳

I feel sad for people who have to go that way. But I also think that it is their right to do with their lives, whatever they wish to. Mature adults are responsible for their acts, and I'd rather not sit on moral judgment over anybody. We can't measure the extent of anybody's grief, so if any of these 4 protagonists want to commit suicide, I'd hope that they don't, but beyond that if it were upto me, I'd not deny them their choice. 😃

@red: And Aladin ji, this is the irony of our existence... We must learn to be happier...
But I, for instance, pray mostly when I am in trouble (at least this is how it is lately)... People are like that... dukh mein sumiran sab karein, sukh mein kare na koi...
Originally posted by nitz17


When someone dies a natural death or wont kill themselves we accept that it was his/her fate. But when someone commits suicide they leave so many unanswered questions behind. People close to them think constantly not knowing what led to their death. Thats the most horrible feeling, not knowing if we did anything to motivate them and feeling guilty for things we are not even sure whether we are responsible

@book... Jess and her mom are having rows with each other for the same reason. Both of them were unable to deal with the unanswered questions that Jen left them after vanishing.
Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by -Aladin-

Is that correct though? I realize that it is the trend, but then why complain and blame our miseries on God? If we are responsible for our actions, then we must be held accountable for both good and bad.
Yes, everyone makes their own choices, but not all choices can be deemed 'correct'. We don't have a right to judge others, but we still make up conclusions about others. Is that not judging as well? We all do that on a daily basis. Yes, it is up to an individual as to what they want to do with their life. It won't make their actions 'right' or 'justified', even if they find it justified. (I hope that made some sense).

Aladin ji... this is the problem with ethical questions. Both sides are right.
One might say, marriage is necessary before man and woman co-habitate, or else they are living in sin. But yet there are nice people who are "living in sin", and when these people are our friends/colleagues, we can't view them through that prism...
The question again boils down to: "who decided what is right and what is not?"...

Perhaps, it'll be easier if we remove "suicide" from the picture---
People say, for instance, that stem cell research should be banned. Their logic: "placental tissue will be exploited, or we don't yet know what we might produce, or..."; and yet the research offers scope to cure disability and alleviate suffering...
One can't dismiss either side of the debate. There is merit in both assumptions. They are both correct.

Likewise, is the matter with suicide. There are countries which legally assist euthanasia, and there is merit in their philosophy.
Now if you say, that a terminally ill or disabled person should have the right to die; then a hopelessly depressed person will not see himself in any different light...

I think, we can't judge what is right or wrong. Or, perhaps we can... but only for ourselves. Our idea of what is right/wrong should not apply to the everyone else...
Edited by -Aladin- - 15 years ago
-Aladin- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
GENERAL DISCUSSIONS (LYING/SWEARING HISTORY)
Originally posted by immunoblot

Maureen has made up her mind to commit suicide on 31.12., and months before she plans to jump down a high rise, she begins telling her spastic son (Matty) that she'll be going for a New Year's party. This woman has had no social life for years, and perhaps out of guilt (that she is sinning: lying and killing herself) she starts fabricating details about the party that she'll be going to... The party has been thrown by Bridgid, and the details include totally irrelevant things... She realizes the excesses of her own lying and says this:
... If Matty had been able to understand anything, he'd have decided that this Bridgid woman was a lunatic, worrying like that about a little get-together. I blushed every time I saw her at the church. And of course I wanted to know what she actually was doing on New Year's Eve, but I never asked. If she was planning to have a party, she might've felt that she had to invite me.
Diverse questions:
A. Lies are a good cover-up... Sometimes we even start believing them. (Maureen also started believeing in them. She decided that she'll take a taxi to the party and will not stay there too long...)
What is your lie percentage?? How often do you lie?

B. If you ask somebody what they are doing on New Year's Eve and if they are planning a party; would you think that that person is somehow required to invite you to it??

(The questions are rather random, so that everybody can chat along... If the other book-readers (RW, Smita ji, Nitzy, Pinki...) have any other such take-off-on-a-tangent questions, please post them too.
And, we also need innovative titles for the reader awards.)
Originally posted by -Aladin-

A. Well, I am not a saint, so of course, I do lie. Depends on the situation. 😳😳
B. Not really. That can happen when you are thinking too much, but I never think too much as it is. I guess everyone has figured that out by my many comments. 😳😆😆
Originally posted by nitz17


A. I used to live on a minimum budget when I was studying and lied when my friends wanted me to go out with them. There is a stereotyped phrase that only rich kids join art schools and in my case it's true coz my friends were rich and I couldn't afford the lavish life they lived. I have only lied to my parents rarely when I knew they wouldn't understand the situation if i told them the truth. With my hubby, not yet, hopefully not ever! I prefer to keep my mouth shut rather than getting caught up in my own lies later.

B.
I used to live on a minimum budget when I was studying and lied when my friends wanted me to go with them. There is a stereotyped phrase that only rich kids join art schools and in my case it's true coz my friends were rich and I couldn't afford the lavish life they lived.
Originally posted by RainbowWarrior



A. low... very little..

B. No, I don't do parties and everyone who knows me knows this so I never get invited, no do I expect to.
Originally posted by pinkisluv91



A. My lie percentage could be 1%, though I never intend to lie sometimes I blurt something out and it's false. I feel guilty though. I don't lie often. I would like to say I don't lie at all but that wouldn't be true. I lie but they are little lies nothing major.

B. I don't think if someone told me they were organizing a party that they would have to invite me, if they were one of my close friends I would feel bad if they didn't invite me, but then again It's their party, they can invite anyone they want.

I will think of some questions and post them later:)
Originally posted by immunoblot


Mine would be more than 1%... but I also lie only to protect (people may not want to hear the truth all the time), or I lie by omission...
With the intent to cause trouble, I never lie.

But there is nothing wrong with lying... I think. If it affects me personally, I'd perfer a non-liar... but if someone just lies to protect their own secrets, I believe that they have a right to do that...
Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by pinkisluv91


I lie when it's something like I really don't want to talk to someone or go somewhere with them and I make false excuses. 😆 I prefer non-liars too. I used to lie a lot when I was younger😆 , but now if I lie the next minute I go and tell the truth:)

Probably that is because our lives are uncomplicated... I feel sad for people who HAVE to lie...

Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by nitz17

Originally posted by immunoblot


@Swearing: I don't swear. (I've said this somewhere else too.)😳

haha... I was just comparing u with Jess. Anyways I didn't read when u mentioned it earlier 😊

Alright then... for your information, once again... my swearing status is as follows:
* I swear v-e-r-y rarely in Hindi. Once every few years, probably. It is too emotionally forceful, I feel.
* In English, I my only oft-used swear word is "Bit*ch"... but daily life doesn't present much opportunities for its use either...

I made this post, because I repeated my previous "award name"-post. I had pressed "Quote" instead of "Edit", and I didn't want an extra post, so I edited it; but needed some content to fill in this post, hence the swearing history...
You all can share your swearing history as well, though I suspect I already know the puritan answers this question is going to generate! 😛
Originally posted by nitz17


Haha... Well I just say idiot or fool mostly and b@st@rd a couple of times when I was really mad and when the person deserved it.... Thats it. My dad never swears and we kind of picked it from him 😊
Originally posted by pinkisluv91


* I never swear😆(puritan answer you guessed it😛) tbh, I have sworn maybe once or twice in my whole life and that is because I was really mad. And I read this book full of swear words so in my mind a swore 1000 times but I never read the full word. But it made me feel kind of dirty when I read it😆.

That's my swearing history😃 Just thought I would post so I wouldn't get the Most quietest award😛

Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by pinkisluv91

Originally posted by immunoblot


Hell is not so bad... They made you walk out for that?! 😲

I swear they did😆 I told my teacher it's just a place and she got madder.


You could've tried telling her that you are Hindu and you don't believe in a hell, and so the punishment is politically incorrect and to force you to leave for such a cause will be construed as a colurful and flagrant display of humble power... 😳
Try this out next time...
Originally posted by -Aladin-

Originally posted by immunoblot

Originally posted by -Aladin-

Hmm, I can't bash in any languages, because everyone knows all the languages that I know. Hindi, Urdu and English, of course. Lekin wo bashing hi kya jo peeth peechay ki jaaye. Gaali deni hai to mun pe do, aur aise do ke doosron ko lage ke phool baras rahe hain. 😆

...

As for the swearing history, I don't swear much. However, I have told off a lot of people and even made people cry (with just my words). I have also slapped quite a few guys, and none of them were picking on me. Mostly it was for my friends. I can't see my friends crying, and if they have been pushed to that by someone, then I do make sure that they regret it. I guess I have an intimidating personality. People normally don't try to mess with me. I guess they are afraid of the telling off they might recieve. Normally, it's not easy for me to loose my temper though. My tolerance limit is quite high, believe it or not. ☯️

I am tending to not believe even a single thing in your post... I can't believe that you would speak so loudly. I can't believe that you'd go about bashing anybody (flowery language or not!). I can't believe that you told-off anybody, slapped guys, or have an intimidating personality or that people are afraid of you. 😳
I do lie sometimes, but this is absolutely true. I have slapped quite a few guys. One of my friends came crying to me once and I was quite shocked. Upon inquiry, I found that some guy had been trying to flirt with her. I cornered him during recess time and gave him two smacks accompanied by a lecture. He never bothered her again. I have had good results. 😳😳😆😆😆 Other occasions were quite similar. I don't use colourful language, but I can be quite rude when I want to.
I do have an intimidating personality but usually that is not the first reaction people get. People normally think that I am extremely soft spoken and very very friendly, which I tell them is not accurate. Of course, nobody believes me. 😡😆😆😆

Originally posted by: RainbowWarrior

hmmm.. I guess then you won't believe that people are intimidated by me as well and no one messes around with me, AND I've never even slapped anyone or used a loud swear word.

Well, there was this one time when the giant heavy-weight boxing champ in college pointed a big finger in my face and said "I'd slap you like a dog if you weren't a girl". I'm not sure exactly what he mean't but his command on the English language was not very good. I laughed and said "Is that your secret hobby or something? Slapping dogs?". After that his face went as red as his tee and he was so angry that he couldn't speak (not to mention foaming at the mouth), he glared at me and walked away. I actually called after him too "Scared you huh?" but he never turned around. I never back down.

You see Mohit, some girls have an aura of authority, regardless of how girly we may seem, no one messes with us 😃 Just because we are nice most of the time, doesn't mean we can't be anything else. You have been warned, lol 😆

Originally posted by: RainbowWarrior



I doubt I'll back down even then 😛 but it all depends on who I'm with. I'm not afraid of what happens to me but a loved one in my company would give the perpetrator leverage.

Oh I'm very similar in real life too, I don't roar unless required and I'm more quiet online 'cos the annoying folks are not actually annoying. I can simply switch them off at anytime. Ignoring real life physically present irritating people is whole different thing. I just bite back. On the web, it's not needed and as a web designer, I would know 😛 😃

Originally posted by: pinkisluv91


Nice questions Aladin:))
1. Some people do exaggerate the truth or they do so with their tone, I never exaggerate it, or I should say I never try to:))

2. Yes we definitely start seeing fault in others to justify our actions, it's just human😆. We shouldn't though.

Originally posted by: nitz17

1. Do we exaggerate the truth sometimes when we are angry?

I don't talk much when I am angry, I will walk out of that place or I am all quiet. I can only speak when I cool down.

I have to exaggerate the truth when I have to talk to clients 😉.
For example:



We had an assignment and in that 2 concentric circles were given and the prof asked us exaggerate it. One guy came up with a right answer..... top view of a woman wearing a bit hat 😃 .




2. Do we start seeing fault in others (that may or may not exist) to justify some of our own actions?

I do it sometimes... After all I am human! 😛

Originally posted by: -Aladin-

I don't think it is possible for people to be alone. Man is a social animal after all. I think a companion is important to have in life, be it parents, siblings, friends, mentor, or a significant other. 😃😃 Though, sometimes we do want to be left alone to our own devices, but khaali dimaagh is shaitaan ka ghar, or so they say.
In blue: Couldn't agree more. 😃😃

-Aladin- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

DISCUSSION ABOUT COSMIC TONY

Originally posted by: nitz17

'If you could make a deal with God, kind of thing. He's sitting there, the Big Guy, across the table from you. And he's saying, OK, Maureen, we like you, but we really want you to stay put, on Earth. What can we do to persuade you? What can we offer you?'

'God's asking me personally?'

'Yeah.'

'If He was asking me personally, He wouldn't have to offer me anything.'

'Really?'

'If God in His infinite wisdom wanted me to stay on Earth, then how could I ask for anything?'

JJ laughed. 'OK, then. Not God.'

'Who, then?'

'A sort of... I don't know. A sort of cosmic, you know, President. Or Prime Minister. Tony Blair. Someone who can get things done. You don't have to do what Tony Blair says without asking for something in return.


In the book they made up a guy called cosmic Tony who has the ability to grant our wishes. Let's assume that this Cosmic Tony guy is for real and he willing to grant 3 wishes for all the members of this reading group but there is a hitch... He would grant these wishes if only there is personal gain, so wishing for something similar to world peace would be nullified 😛

What would you wish for?

Originally posted by: immunoblot


Wunderbar! 👍🏼
Wish one: A personal paradisiacal island.
Wish two: An infinite supply of everything good.
Wish three: An infinite supply of such wishes!

Originally posted by: -Aladin-

Ah, now that's a wonderful question, Nitz ji. 😃😃
1. Unlimited travel pass for me and my family
2. Beautiful house with a perfect garden
3. A huge library full of books that "I" like 😳😳😃😃

Originally posted by: Veritas


Wonderful question Nitzy👍🏼
1> I would like to see the world(universe)..every aspect of it oceans ,rivers ,jungles the himalayas,space(and have Mr Veritas along too).. and experience it from the perspective of every living thing.
2>Know every good thing that ever happened and be able to read every good book ever written.
3>I will steal Blot ji's wish..have and endless supply of such wishes.

Originally posted by: nitz17



Martin:

In the last few months, I have been to prison, lost every last molecule of self-respect, become estranged from my children and thought very seriously about killing myself. I mean, that little lot has got to be the psychological equivalent of cancer, right? And it's certainly a bigger deal than acting in a bloody film. So how come I've learned absolutely bugger all? What was I supposed to learn? True, I have discovered that I was quite attached to my self-esteem, and regret its passing. Also, I've found out that prison and poverty aren't really me. But, you know, I could have had a wild stab in the dark about both of those things beforehand. Call me literal- minded, but I suspect people might learn more about themselves if they didn't get cancer. They'd have more time, and a lot more energy.

We all do mistakes, sometimes small and sometimes unforgettable. There are some instances where, if we think back, we feel that we could have avoided them, or made the right decision, and in turn we would have had a better life. Any such regrets?



Maureen:

'What about you?' I said to JJ. 'What would you say to Cosmic Tony?'

'Ha. I'm not sure, man.' He calls everyone 'man', even if you're not a man. You get used to it. 'Maybe, I don't know. Live the last fifteen years all over again or something. Finish high school. Forget about music. Become the kind of person who's happy to settle for what he is, rather than what he wants to be, you know?'

Cosmic Tony again! 😃

If cosmic Tony gives you one chance to travel back in time and alter your life, what would you do? Go back and change it or happy the way you are now? If you choose to change what would it be? (Reminds me of 'The Butterfly Effect' Movie)

Originally posted by: -Aladin-

Nice quotes, Nitz ji and brilliant questions. 😃😃
There is no doubt that we all make mistakes in our lives. Sometimes, these mistakes can have graver circumstances, at others, they are forgettable. I have no regrets though, because I beieve we need to learn from our mistakes. Nobody can change the past. Jo ho gaya, so ho gaya. Kya us ka gham jo kho gaya. We should make the best of what life throws at us.
What would I alter? I wouldn't alter anything, actually. If I change something, then that could lead to other circumstances, which may also be not acceptable to me, so I would live with whatever has happened in the past and leave it there. 😃😃

This leads me to another question. Should we judge others on their past or give them another chance? Do you believe in second chances.

Originally posted by: nitz17

"They come. They fight. They destroy. They corrupt. It always ends the same." - Lost TV show.

Aladin ji I completely agree with ur first answer.

My grand dad died when I was three and I've some vague memories about him. I don't know whether I made him up in mind when my was telling about him or it is really my memories. Though i don't want to alter anything in my life I just want to relive those memories again.

Second chance..... Everyone deserve a second chance; thats what we say, but at the cost some people like chelsea king and amber dubious. So I feel it depends on circumstance and whom we are giving that second chance.

-Aladin- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

DISCUSSION ON STALKING/ STEREOTYPES

Originally posted by: immunoblot


Jess is planning to commit suicide, and here is how she describes the build-up of that emotion:

I was at a party downstairs in the squat. It was a shit party, full of all these ancient crusties sitting on the floor drinking cider and smoking huge spliffs and listening to weirdo space-out reggae. At midnight, one of them clapped sarcastically, and a couple of others laughed, and that was it - Happy New Year to you too. You could have turned up to that party as the happiest person in London, and you'd still have wanted up to jump off the roof by five past twelve. And I wasn't the happiest person in London anyway. Obviously.
The reason she was at that party is because she is looking for her ex-boyfriend who was supposed to be there (but obviously isn't). So, as she proceeds to go on, she follows this passage with her view on "stalking"...
I tried his mobile for the one zillionth time, but it wasn't on. When we first split up, he called me a stalker, but that's like an emotive word, 'stalker', isn't it? I don't think you can call it stalking when it's just phone calls and letters and emails and knocking on the door. And I only turned up at his work twice. Three times, if you count his Christmas party, which I don't, because he said he was going to take me to that anyway.
Stalking is when you follow them to the shops and on holiday and all that, isn't it? Well, I never went near any shops. And anyway, I didn't think it was stalking when someone owed you an explanation. Being owed an explanation is like being owed money, and not just a fiver, either. Five or six hundred quid minimum, more like. If you were owed five or six hundred quid minimum and the person who owed it to you was avoiding you, then you're bound to knock on his door late at night, when you know he's going to be in. People get serious about that sort of money. They call in debt collectors, and break people's legs, but I never went that far. I showed some restraint.

Stalking is also a popular theme in other media... my favourite instance of stalking is in a British show called "coupling"--- (Warning! A WORD and SOME SOUNDS might TROUBLE the folks with delicate ears?!)
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-erm4XzgCNI[/YOUTUBE]

What is the deal about stalking?It is one of those words that is widely abused in common language... and perhaps it means less and less in society, that what it means in the court of law...
I presume that none of us ever stalked anyone (with dangerous intent), but it might be nice if we share instances of stalking or being stalked which are/were funny...

Originally posted by: -Aladin-

Actually, I have stalked someone with dangerous intent, if you want to call it that. I didn't realize at that time people would term it stalking. I have tracked down people, i.e. looked for them in a number of places before finding them, only to give them a few choice lectures, which they probably did not appreciate. 😳😆😆😆😆
One incident that I do find quite hilarious, is when back in high school, someone wanted to threaten me and couldn't find me, they actually send someone over who was in the same section to come and track me down. Gosh. I was such a child. I met them and told them if they try to talk to me again, I won't be coming to meet them but will go straight to the principal's office. 😳😳😆😆😆

Originally posted by: immunoblot


Books always have sentiments attached to them... Your actions were legit, I'd say...

Originally posted by: immunoblot


The question was actually genuine... Spying, Stalking... we use these words, but often in a rather exaggerated context.

My father had a very massive heart attack. Before it struck him, he used to smoke so much that real chimneys (of houses where firewood would be burned) would be put to shame...
Of course, after the attack... he was prohibited from smoking... and while we all hoped that he'd quit finally, we all knew that that wouldn't happen. My brother and I were therefore sharing the responsibility of following him secretly when he went out for his walks, and even though my father had a rather sophisticated method of sneak-purchasing the ciagarettes, we still caught him... and then proceeded to set a trap to catch him red-handed.
Of course, once cornered, he accused us of stalking and syping (which perhaps we were guilty of)... but even then, I felt the use of the words: stalking/spying was unjustified. (Here, amongst us... it is alright. Unless there is an argument, and people start saying that, "you stalk me", and such stuff...)

Originally posted by: nitz17



nice comparison 😆😆

It's is not bad when we are doing it but is very bad when someone is spying or stalking us 😛😆

Originally posted by: nitz17

My own feeling about JJ, without knowing anything about him, was that he might have been a gay person, because he had long hair and spoke American. A lot of Americans are gay people, aren't they? I know they didn't invent gayness, because they say that was the Greeks. But they helped bring it back into fashion. Being gay was a bit like the Olympics: it disappeared in ancient times, and then they brought it back in the twentieth century. Anyway, I didn't know anything about gays, so I just presumed they were all unhappy and wanted to kill themselves.

Share some stereotypes that you had about other cultures, race and places.

I used to think all scientists in US are millionaires until I met a couple of them from Hogwarts who worked for minimum wages. They said that asking for a raise is selfish and offensive in their work culture.

Originally posted by: pinkisluv91



I read my life is desi and that's my desi life too😆, they're good for laughs. But only 15% or less is true according to me.

Originally posted by: pinkisluv91



I believe the white folks one😆, desi folks tend to be wannabes at times, but even if they aren't people think they are wannabes 😆, show offs-yea they are😕 I don't believe in many stereotypes but do believe in some.

Originally posted by: immunoblot


I would also tend to agree with the stereotypes that Aladin ji just described... It is funny that we began with a discussion of PC-ness and now we are listing stereotypes...
The mathematicians-one, I'll change to "scientists have no life"... Sometimes, I believe that that is even literally true. 😆😆😆

Originally posted by: Veritas


I used to think anyone with good education would be wise,I mean free of prejudice or atleast stupidity.
Sadly I have seen engineers,doctors ,people with doctorates.. whose education did nothing to elevate their mind.
I also used to think people in the States would be more politically aware, but they fall for rhetoric and misinformation just as easily.

Originally posted by: Veritas


I disagree Blot ji,I think they have a lot of things right,and they are more open then say some old cultures /countries of the world.
There is no culture because their history doesn't go a long way back.

Originally posted by: immunoblot


Come to Europe, Pinki! There is a dstinct cultural identity of every city here! Though, they aren't as evolved as the Americans in celebrating diversity...

@Germans: I think, they sound sexy... I love their language so much... ⭐️

Originally posted by: Veritas



That is because you are in Alabama.The cities are better..imagine if you were in some village in UP or Bihar.
The prejudice is worse there.

Originally posted by: -Aladin-

Hmm, actually, don't know about the crime rates in Europe, but even in the US, it is only certain areas. We also need to consider the population though. I expect they are quite similar.

Originally posted by: nitz17

If you like to be with Indian crowd then New Jersey is the place (I wouldn't recommend though).
If u want Mumbai ambiance, New York.... my friends had nicknamed it as 'Mumbai with snow'
If you like pleasant climate with nice landscape and no snow... apart from few light tremors and rain, California
I have never been to Texas but my friends who live there love the place coz of the hot climate, culture and food.
Chicago has one of the best transport system in US and has diverse culture.
I like Boston coz it is one of the old cities..
I feel Atlanta is boring and workaholic

These are the places I have visited in US 😊

Originally posted by: -Aladin-

'I'm asking, aren't I? Because if we're a gang, then we'll all try and live
by the rules. And there's only one, anyway. Rule 1: We don't kill ourselves for six weeks. And if we're not a gang, then, you know. Whatever. So are we a gang, or not a gang?'
'Not a gang,' said Martin.
'Why aren't we?'
'No offence, but' Martin clearly hoped these three words, and a wave of the hand in our general direction, would save him from having to explain himself. I wasn't going to let him off the hook, though.
I hadn't felt like I was in this gang either, until that moment. And now I belonged to the gang that Martin didn't like much, and I felt real committed to it.
'But what?' I said.
'Well. You're not, you know. My Kind Of People.' He said it like that, I swear. I heard the capitals as clearly as I heard the lower case.
How important is it to have 'friends', who are 'our kind of people'. Could you be friends with someone who perhaps does not share the same sentiments as you. Would that difference cause you to drift from each other? Do instances in our life sometimes bring us closer to certain type of people. What are your thoughts. 😃😃

Originally posted by: Veritas


I think there must be something connecting people..for them to be friends,It may be an interest,belief system ..a tragedy , a problem...anything.
You have to agree on something strongly to be able to weather disagreements.

And the answer to the previous questions..I wouldn't change anything in my life.My mistakes made be what I am .
Well maybe I will change the cautious part of my natureEmbarrassed.

I thought we should talk something about the book to keep Blot happy😆

Veritas thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
Awesome Aladin Ji👏👏
After reading your collection...I realized we did discuss the book😃
-Aladin- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
CAN WE DO THINGS BETTER?
CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE BOOK

Originally posted by: immunoblot

This is what Maureen says about doing up the room for her son, Matty. Matty is severely spastic.

This all began years ago, when I decided to decorate his bedroom.
He was eight, and he still slept in a nursery - clowns on the curtains, bunny rabbits on the frieze round the wall, all the things I'd chosen when I was waiting for him and I didn't know what he was. And it was all peeling away, and it looked terrible, and I hadn't done anything about it because it made me think too much about what wasn't happening to him, all the ways he wasn't growing up. What was I going to replace the bunny rabbits with?
He was eight, so perhaps trains and rocket ships and maybe even footballers were the right sort of thing for him - but of course he didn't know what any of those things were, what they meant, what they did. But there again, he didn't know what the rabbits were either, or the clowns. So what was I supposed to do? Everything was pretending, wasn't it? The only thing I could do that wasn't make-believe was paint the walls white, get a plain pair of curtains. That would be a way of telling him and me and anyone else who came in that I knew he was a vegetable, a cabbage, and I wasn't trying to hide it. But then, where does it stop? Does that mean you can never buy him a T-shirt with a word on it, or a picture, because he'll never read, and he can't make any sense of pictures? And who knows whether he even gets anything out of colours, or patterns? And it goes without saying that talking to him is ridiculous, and smiling at him, and kissing him on the head. Everything I do is pretending, so why not pretend properly?

I think, in this passage, Maureen shows more spark than me. I know, for instance that I will not live here long enough... and this has been my constant thought for all the 5 years that I have been here. I never got plants for my balcony, or tried to make my place any more comfortable than it already was...
In short, I've lived like a nomad, even though in hindsight, I think I could've established a comfortable home for myself all those years ago when I came here...

The crux is... we're only pretending all the time... to be leading stable, happy lives... and yet I know that we all never really do that properly. Is it just me, or is it all of you??
Come on then, tell us things that you could've done better...

Originally posted by: pinkisluv91



Okay well I never lived a stable life, ever. I always wanted one but never had one. We moved from place to place and my parents never really decorated our house as we would if we were to live there permanently, I always wanted a room with pink walls but we never did that since we lived in apartments and couldn't do that. We always knew we would move so never really settled down. Our house now is a bit settled but still we are thinking abt moving in another two years. I have changed too many schools too so never had one friend my whole life. It's strange. 😕

Originally posted by: pinkisluv91



Even if we have our own home now we don't get too many things since we are moving out in 2 years and my parents never take our old stuff with we just buy new things when we move. We made the mistake to buy pets many times and it was heartbreaking to leave them. Don't ever get a pet. It's sad when you have to depart I agree abt the books too.

Originally posted by: immunoblot


Yeah... you always get attached to them...
But cats are nice... they are independent animals... when you leave, and leave them behind, they'll manage just fine... 😃

Originally posted by: immunoblot


Smita ji, don't... but if you have strays in your vicinity, do feed them. You'll be happy...

There are only very few people who can give/care... and if you are one of those people, don't supress that quality... I said this to my mum also (because she was also very heart-broken when our dog died; and taking food for the stray dogs really eased her pain)...

Originally posted by: immunoblot

Here is a very moving piece from a newpaper columnist...

While the young and single life is certainly exciting, eventually a man wants to settle down, to have someone there to greet him when he comes home, someone to love him and care for him always, which is why we have dogs.

When I was in my early 20s and decided to buy a dog, I carefully researched the most suitable breed by going to my neighbor's house and picking a puppy from the litter in his garage. As it turned out, they were all huskies, a breed of dog about as easy to train as velociraptors. I named my puppy Chinook, and after six months of training I had managed to teach it the following tricks:

1. Tear up the couch.

2. Eat my socks.

3. Run away when called.

Of these three, "run away" was the most annoying, because the couch was from my old room at the fraternity house and smelled like it needed an autopsy, and my socks smelled like the couch.

When Chinook ran off, though, it implied she thought she was the boss, which was especially vexing because I couldn't think of a way to prove her wrong. I lived in northern Michigan at the time, working for General Motors, and, let's face it, huskies are better at running through snow than guys wearing ties and loafers. Lacking a better idea, though, I'd pursue her until finally I'd tackle her and then be too exhausted to do anything but lie there with my arms around her.

This is what you wanted? her look said to me, a big hug?

Eventually we reached a compromise: She'd stop running away if I built a fence.

In my defense, I was just doing what many pet owners do, which is to be dumber than my dog. If I'd had any sense, I would have realized that huskies are bred to drag things across long distances and that instead of driving to work on the highway, I should have been taking the Iditarod.

"Chinook," I asked her, "why don't you like me?"

I'm hungry, her look said to me. Pass the socks.

After a few years, I had a family ' and Chinook decided that sticking around suited her just fine. The children were always willing to sit in the wagon or sled and have Chinook pull them. She was finally doing what she craved: She was working.

We moved to a country house in southern Michigan, which is much warmer than northern Michigan by 1 degree Fahrenheit. Chinook never ran away unless there was a thunderstorm, of which she was terrified. At the first rumble from the sky, I made sure she was safely locked in the basement.

One day when the family was out, a storm came, and by the time we returned home Chinook had climbed the fence and fled the thunder. I drove around yelling out my car window (making me very popular with my neighbors), posted signs and took out newspaper ads.

After a week of searching, I had to face it: I'd lost Chinook. Heartbroken, I saw this as just another in a series of failures in pet ownership, and vowed not to get another dog until I was smart enough to take care of one.

And then a farmer called me, responding to my advertisement. Though it had been 9 days and though his farm was more than 25 miles from my home, the stray he'd found sounded enough like my dog for me to drive up there to take a look.

When I pulled into his driveway, a big husky was lying out in the field, 50 yards away. As I stood up, that dog raised her head and then streaked across the field in a flash, tackling me to the ground. It was Chinook, yipping excitedly, licking me, jumping on me, crying. I grabbed her, and she gave me a look that said: This is what I wanted. A great big hug.

That was a long time ago, and I still think I wasn't cut out to be a husky owner ' but that day, seeing how happy Chinook was to see me, I realized this: I must have done something right.

Originally posted by: Veritas

OK Guys here is my take on each of the character and whether or not they were justified in their actions.

Maureen:Can't blame her ..She spent 20 years of her life taking care of a kid who was basically brain dead.
She talked to him ,read to him took care of him basically lived for him and consequently ended up not having a life of her own.
According to me the biggest mistake Maureen made was believe in religion,words written on paper and people who couldn't care less about her or Matty.It is ok to be selfish .. Maureen shouldn't have put her stock in people who didn't have the sensitivity to understand her plight.
I wouldn't blame her for trying to take her life
.
😔
😔
Martin:The guy had a choice,but I can understand where he was coming from.
People basically wrote him off even before he could start.His reputation preceded him everywhere.Being in the media business he could have milked the situation to his advantage and he had alot of things to look forward to in life.
He could have actually cleaned up his act.
Atleast he had kids and a loving girlfriend .
So I am pretty neutral about his decision.😳

Jess:So she fell for a loser of a guy and he betrayed her..Join the club.
It happens to millions of women around the world and they don't jump of high rises.
One sentence of Chas can give you an idea about his character and if Jess fell for him she should have the strength to stand by her decisions and own up the consequences.
And her sister killed herself..does that give her sanction to be an official pain in the butt to everyone around.Her parents were suffering through the tragedy too...The only reason Jess got away with her behavior was because she was young...I have seen many 18 year olds who have lived through much more tragedy and have come out triumphant without losing their dignity.
👎🏼


JJ:His band broke up..He was sad...Ok.
He didn't have much of an education ,but he could get work.
So basically he could have easily worked during daytime and joined up college at night.Did somebody stop him...nope.
Of all the characters he had the lamest reasons🤢👎🏼



I liked the premise of the book and the idea was quiet intriguing,but the ending kind of fell flat for me....May be because it was too realistic.I wanted some hope ..at least for MAureen

Originally posted by: Veritas



I know where you are coming from Blot ji..But I don't relate to any of the characters except maybe Maureen..That is because I have been brought up with this over blown sense of duty.
Martin ,Jess and JJ are responsible for their own misery..so I cannot relate to them.

But overall the book was good..it was funny and the author handled such a serious subject with competence.

Related Topics

Chat Clubs Thumbnail

Posted by: naadanmasakalli

1 years ago

TrollBaaaz Corner#57 (Invites Only)

This CC is for discussions regarding IB + idhar udhar ki baatein .. Rules: NO Discussion of any other Fandom allowed in This CC in regards to...

Expand ▼
Chat Clubs Thumbnail

Posted by: Forgotten-Toy

4 years ago

*~H.G.O.R.C. #550~*- $~Invites Only~$

Rules for this CC This is a "NO ENTRY" CC. Meaning, don't dare set your foot in here because we WILL NOT allow anyone else into our CC anymore....

Expand ▼
Chat Clubs Thumbnail

Posted by: Sumaiya27

2 years ago

Deewani Type Girls #7 (Invites Only)

Welcome everyone to the SEVENTH CC thread where will share our dewaangi as pankhis (fangirls) of our fav itv shows, fav actors and actresses...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".