why against rajini - Page 3

I guess nobody would have accused Rajni so much had she not been shown as an outright honest and righteous person. Going by her previous behaviour, people would have expected her to come out clean on the first night of their marriage. Agreed, her mom spoke the entire truth of Rajni's surrogacy to the Vaishnav parivar before marriage, but not even for once, did she feel the urge to discuss this with her husband. You spend the entire night talking about your past, Krish shares so many things but Rajni didn't feel the need to bring up her surrogacy even once. This is actually a characterisation flaw of Rajni by the makers or she is purposely being shown as a hypocrite!

Somehow I believe the latter to be true as if you all remember during the scene when she seeks Krish's forgiveness, she says that all this while she couldn't muster the courage to tell the truth where Krish told her right away that he wouldn't have consented to marry her had he knew about her past. That's when she confesses that her respect for Krish multiplied ten times and towards the end touched his feet twice!!

So the problem is not whether is the problem/past is grave enough to be forgiven or not but the way our female lead, Rajni has handled the entire situation. She missed the opportunity of telling Krish on the first night and then second time in the resort when she got to know of Archana's death in ye newspaper. And even after that when she saw that Krish had a lot of doubts/questions in his mind regarding her recent behaviour, then also she didn't come clean. Just because Krish had told her that she can reveal when ever she is ready, so she conveniently assumed that he already knows about her surrogacy though her mother and that he is asking just for the heck of asking; so why not jerk him around.

I say she took undue advantage of Krish's love and faith in her. Now that she has broken his trust, I seriously don't think she is making amends or actually understanding the hurt she has caused to the one person who loved her like crazy.

Originally posted by: desi5555

Okay I had to get this off my chest.

@ amarjeet73 you are calming 70% people hid their past, so you are saying that Rajo and her parents did not do anything wrong by hiding the fact that she was scammed into becoming a surrogate mother. They were afraid that no guy will marry Rajo if the guy and his family came to know that she gave birth to a child (even if it was for surrogacy purpose - for good cause and that too without asking anything in return -- money).

So lets take a hypothetical scenario.. A girl (boy) needs blood transfusion after a major accident she was in. and the blood she received was HIV positive [due to negligence of doc and other members of the hospital]. She and her/his family comes to know about this. After some time a rishta comes for her/him, and her/his parents wants to make sure that their daughter/son has a good life after all that has happened. So they decided that they will not disclose this fact to the groom/bride and the potential in-laws.. after all it is about their daughter's/son's happiness and if the groom/bride and his/her family comes to know about it they would not accept the rishta. [Another case can be what is the person already knew they cannot have kids]. When is it "okay" to hid (not disclose) information to the potential in-laws?

All I am trying to say here is no mater how big/small the past is...Rule of thumb is: if you feel the need to hid your past, from your future in-laws, chances are when the truth comes out, everyone is going to get hurt. so it is better to put everything on the table so no one feels cheats or betrayed.

Understood your extrapolation but the same doesn't apply in this case. And also where does the question arise of using common sense so as to avoid hurting your husband's feelings when Rajni believes that everybody in her sasural knows her past. According to Rajni, her mother told the surrogacy thing, the Vaishnav parivar were okay with the entire thing, accepted her as their bahu inspire of knowing that she has already had a baby.

So if it's a common known truth in her sasural and Krish knows according to Rajni, then where does the question arise of hurting his feelings if he knew about it already. Wouldn't Rajni like to see how Krish dealt when he got to know about her past or may be just to thank him for being mature and understanding enough!

Originally posted by: lats22

first of all you cannot compare a death with delivering a baby!! it is very foolish comparison no parents will do that for sure..

another issue is, as far as rajini is concerned her mum already informed the family about her past hence she agreed for the marriage, Did I miss an episode where Rajo's mom told the V-parivar the truth. come on Rajo knows her mom very well. Rajo knew that her mom was lying., anyways it is also Rajo's responsibility to let Krish now.

and i don't think any female for that matter will go and tell after marriage about their past to their husband or his family that she got a child, as she already know that her parents already sorted out her issue with the family and no one would like to bring up the topic of the child with her husband to hurt him!! it is just a common sense

as far as rajini is concerned she caught up in a situation of what to do , or what not to do.. all we are asking cvs' to do here is have Rajo show some kind of remorse instead of that big smile she carries around all day. she needs to understand that Krish needs some time and space. to be honest she is suffocating poor Krish by being around all the time. Give poor guy some space and let him be for a while, when his anger calms down he will talk to Rajo. Right now he is really mad...so it will take time. Rajo said lie after lie (if her mom had already told the family about the kid, why lie???) and she cannot except to be forgive in a jiffy. She needs to be in Krish shoe to find out what it like when some you love more than yourself lied to you for the beginning.

hence when she find out the truth she informed her husband's family and left decision on them.. she had to disclose the truth as she was caught.. everyone figured out there was a deep connect with Aryan and he was not just her friend's son as she had been calming all along.

I would have been ok with rajni's character if they were not trying to show her gaay... I would see her as a more flashy kind of person trying to impres everyone around...be it going to market to take veggies the very first day after marriage or making Kheer and baati...she tries hard to be in limelight... Initially I liked yashodas character where she knew her son doesn't love poulomi ,she appeared to be smart but now Rajni can easily manipulate her ,I sometimes find her character annoying...

Originally posted by: desi5555

Ek to chori, upar se ceena zori! She really doesn't regret anything, does she?

Dear rajni !!!!
Give krish some time to recover himself from the bomb u have blasted on him 😛 ...v know u r mahan n ll remain mahan in the show 😡 ... And namita ur bro needs ur more than rajni ...if u r with rajni then console ur bro too...help him dun spoil sis bro relation

all frnds who are fans of krish naturally do not want to be cheated by rajni.it is obivious.