Originally posted by: TallyHo
Btw Maya,
Ankur was Shabana's debut film...and debut film for Shyam benegal too...and Waheeda rehman was offered the role first and she refused to do it...
Ankur also the first among the many so called parallel cinema films that were made in the 70's and 80's
But like I said...no arguing with u...so if u disagree...u are right!!😊
Ash, You and I never have arguments🤗. Only discussions because we exchange our views not compel the other one to accept it.😊
Shabana was very good in so many movies. Personally I don't like to brand any cinema as arty or commerical but that is how everyone does and even these actors divide cinema. For me an actor is truely versatile or has potential when he or she can get into the character, whatever that is.
Just because an actor wears a cotton saree sans make-up doesn't mean that she is brilliant performer and the one with glossy make-up and dancing ones are mediocre. The difference between art and commercial cinema. An actor gives several takes in any type of cinema and often we get confused between actual script of the cinema and actor'c calibre and praise the unworthy😛
Shabana Azmi has failed many times in commerical cinema. She was always mediocre in such movies and don't blame her looks because Smita Patil who isn't much of a looker, was equally good in commercial as well as arty ones. She just fit into every character she played. Now that is an actor with calibre. Shabana is someone who failed in commercial cinema and then decided to stick to art movies because that gave her name and fame. She always keeps herself at par with Smita Patil. According to me she is nowhere near Smita Patil, the actor.
Many could disagree with me but that is their choice. These are my views on Shabana Azmi.
Actually I forgot Rekha who is another versatile actor at par with Smita Patil.
Edited by Maya_M - 17 years ago
17