If Sanju is a hit only because of Raju Hirani, why is Pathan's success not due to Siddharth Anand, who is known for his high-octane action movies and slick production values?
Anand's brand of cinema is often characterized by big-budget productions with a strong focus on action and spectacle. They are glossy, full of sheen, and larger-than-life characters and known to attract large audiences. Not only that, but his last venture War also broke box-office records, and Pathan followed a similar recipe for success.
While Shah Rukh Khan's megastardom is certainly a factor in the film's success, it is important to acknowledge Anand's contribution to the film's overall appeal.
Either way, there are people who run down Ranbir for no reason at all. I read in the other thread that Sanju is hit only bcoz of Raju Hirani.
It's unfair to run down Gen Y and suggest that the era of superstars ended with Hrithik Roshan. Every generation produces its own superstars, and it's important to recognize and celebrate the talents of up-and-coming actors.