Originally posted by: vijay
I am commenting here cause I know both Riva and her mother. In my limited interactions with her she is an intelligent girl and she knows what she is doing and is passionate about making a career in acting.
Firstly she is certainly not 12 and is 16 year old and will turn 17 in 3-4 months. People calling her 12 just cause IMDb / Google says so and I can tell for sure that it is wrong and it will be corrected in due course.
Secondly treat Acting also as a profession just like any other profession Sports, Tech, Medical etc. Yes it's more glamorous but the setup today is much more professional compared to the past.
And as I understand, many want to cast her in movies / music videos or promotions etc cause she is an actress and is a popular social media influencer with over 8.5mn followers just on Instagram and around 900K subscribers on Youtube. It's not very new trend and that is why we see so many social media stars featured in music videos in the past.
It makes me sick to read some of the insensitive and wild accusations which I do not want to repeat in my post again. If you do not know don't make baseless accusations.
I saw the "controversial" video clip with Karan Kundra. The only objection of mine would be to showcase "alcohol" in the shot even though it was clearly mentioned in her post that it was not real and just for show.
On the larger debate I want to ask is she the only one who has been paired onscreen with much older male actors?
Sridevi (born 1963) first role as a teen-adult came in 1976 at age 13 (as per WikiPedia), when she was cast in the Tamil film Moondru Mudichu played the love interest of Rajnikant (born 1950) and Kamal Hasan (Born 1954).
Tamannah Bhatia was 15 when she got her first romantic movie Chaand Sa Roshan Chehra. If one researches you will find many more examples.
It's easy for people to suggest that people should be 18 first. Many of the actors who made it big have started early in life. Not all have the luxury of being launched by their parents connection in the industry at the "right" age with the "right" hero.
I can relate to her cause I too had an unconventional start to my career. I am a self taught computer programmer. I started doing odd freelancing web projects work when I was 14/15 year of age. At age 17 burnt my fingers in running computer education business. Started working full time for a startup at 18 while still in college and I purely got it just because of past work experience and was very fortunate to be paid higher than some of the IITians in the company.
Everyone has their own journey and struggles and we do not know unless we are in their shoes.
Peace.
I completely agree with what you're saying, Vijay, however acting is different since it requires both natural talent and the ability to portray the character she was given, convincingly irrespective of her age.
You must persuade the audience with your ability to portray that particular persona, or else you risk fading into obscurity, because this is sort of an imaginary realm where the logic and laws of the real world do not apply. Her decision to continue acting from season to season is one that she and her family must have made consciously.
Physically and mentally, a girl of 12 years old and a girl of 16 or 17 years old are very different.
We must be impressed if a 16 or 17-year-old girl can demonstrate her talent in a particular role.
However, it is unethical and illegal to use her as a sex symbol or for other vice videos or ads.
Dimple Kapadia was just 14 year old girl when she entered in to the acting career in Bobby.
Following the sharp increase in child-centric content on both television and streaming platforms in India, the stature of child artists has been elevated to central characters holding up entire plots in both films and TV serials,and the huge remuneration which is alluring many to enter into the tinsel world at an early age and consequently trying to be there for long, changing the roles from child artist to a romantic lead, the choices are at times a bit hasty but for them, it is a necessary change for their sustainability!!
The situations of Sri Devi, Rekha, and numerous other young actors are similar in that they choose to change their roles from child actors to romantic leads at a young age in order to maintain their on-screen presence.
The glorification of school-age kids' romance and their eloping from the house to portray their love as an eternal one are particular phases that were severely condemnable, yet people enjoyed and contributed to the success of those movies.
It's all about the money, as our several IF members correctly pointed out, and most of the time, the gifted kids are anxious to establish themselves as successful heroines in this glitter world as soon as possible.
The most crucial question here is: To what extent is it OK to taunt a girl like this, disparage her age and physical appearance, and traumatise her for choosing to pursue her career?
Following the clarification of her lawyer mother's remark about her age and priorities, the public has no right to interject like this.
Yes, agree, it is a risky career, with full of vulgar vulture's presence everywhere.
For instance, while filming for the movie Hum Panchhi Ek Daal Ke, the former actress Daisy Irani testified about being sexually assaulted at the age of 6 by the guy designated as her guardian. Similar to how a 15-year-old Rekha was forced to kiss a 30-year-old actor Biswagit while filming Anjana Safar, this kind of early exposure to the vices of the entertainment industry is heartbreaking and strongly condemnable.
Also keep in mind that today's youth are independent and outspoken in their decision-making.
It is up to Riva Arora and her family to determine whether or not to take action as her career at this stage/ age.
Edited by Viswasruti - 2 years ago
44