Akshay Kumar announces his next titled 'Ram Setu' - Page 2

Can somebody explain about RamSetu to me? Not quite getting the context

Why is it a question? It's a myth. 10% of Ramayan is true, rest all is fabricated.

Originally posted by: IF_ki_Ammi

I think Laxmi couldn't entered the temple cuz she was trying to kill some one have not seen the film but this is what was shown in Kanchana...it was not cuz of being a trans but cuz the intention later when Kanchana ask the god he let him enter the Mandir and she did killed the villain in narsimha style

Kanchan and Laxxmi are two completely different films...my friend saw both and that's what she told me

Originally posted by: BarunPrabhasFan

Can somebody explain about RamSetu to me? Not quite getting the context

What are u finding difficult? I think I can help.

Ram setu is the bridge between Srilanka and India which was made with the help of Banarsena in Ramayana. Thus it is problematic to make a movie on it and calling it a myth. In certain satellite pictures today the bridge can be seen under water.

[YOUTUBE]https://youtu.be/odUtqDz4lEk[/YOUTUBE]

SriRam went to Lanka to rescue Sita mata through this bridge.

Originally posted by: BarunPrabhasFan

Can somebody explain about RamSetu to me? Not quite getting the context

Originally posted by: Ashley.Tisdale

Kanchan and Laxxmi are two completely different films...my friend saw both and that's what she told me

Actually, I would beg to differ, Laxmi was a 99% scene by scene copy of kanchana, except from the fact that in Laxmii the male lead is a Muslim whereas in kanchana the male lead was a Hindu. Otherwise, the entire movie was identical, including the scenes, dialogues. The ending too, it's more like Laxmi can't enter the temple as she was a spirit and trying to kill someone, not because she's transgender.

Originally posted by: DexterRocks

Actually, I would beg to differ, Laxmi was a 99% scene by scene copy of kanchana, except from the fact that in Laxmii the male lead is a Muslim whereas in kanchana the male lead was a Hindu. Otherwise, the entire movie was identical, including the scenes, dialogues. The ending too, it's more like Laxmi can't enter the temple as she was a spirit and trying to kill someone, not because she's transgender.

They added lots of controversial elements by changing the religion of the hero. So even tho most of the movie is the same...the base has been altered.

In Laxxmi, my friend said that Akshay calls the villian out of the temple and then kills him...but in Kanchana he could enter the temple once he speaks to God asking for justics...thats what I found problematic.

He knows how to handle people like Karni Sena. One hinduphobic scene or dialogue and then one post for the army or a non political IV with Pm and he is good to go

But seriously, he was nowhere compared to Sharad Kelkar in Laxmii and should take a break and just work on his art instead of signing 103757 movies a year.

Bollywoodias have no respect for any religion and only understand money. Hoping some folks understand this truth now atleast

Doesn't he get tired? I get tired just by hearing news about his every other new film in every two months.