Did Sonakshi and Parineeti miss out on the chance - Page 2

Parineeti was the first choice for piku but I can not imagine her as piku. Deepika made the role memorable. So I don't think Parineeti is better actress than Derpika.

Sonakshi is not consistent in her performances. In some roles she is unintentionally comical. Do again I don't think she is better actress than Deepika.

they are both so inconsistent

sonakshi was good in lootera and kalank but was so bad and robotic in movies like akira..force 2 (terrible) and so many more

parineeti was good initially in Ladies and Ishaqzaade but was terrible in Golmaal, MPB and NE

i don't know how many more chances can one get..them not getting chances is a joke..the fact that after flops and flops and flops and some really bad performances..they are still getting work. in fact they have been given way more chances than they deserve..

this would have been appropriate for someone like ileana but these 2 got way more chances than they deserved and it is only their displaced priorities or sheer laziness that they failed..

Originally posted by: Harley_Quinn

They both didn't look like quintessential Bollywood heroine, and that's where they failed. Because even when the so called feminists expect all actresses to like like angels dropped from heaven with perfect hourglass figure, then what could you expect from the general audience.

Otherwise Pari was a better actress than Deepika, and Sonakshi too was a good actress along with being a very good dancer.

Just see how effortlessly she matches steps with Prabhudeva and Shahid Go Go Govinda and Saree Ke Fall Sa.

But she didn't used her skills properly, or maybe she didn't get a chance. Because in Bollywood, even when you are a star kid, actresses don't get projects for the purpose of showcasing their talent (Excluding Karan Johar kids).

How did Alia become successful then? She's worse looking than these 2.

Originally posted by: mintyblue

How did Alia become successful then? She's worse looking than these 2.

You know very well how.

Theyve had plenty of chances to act and sing and its all sucked apart from a Parineeti magazine shoot 😆

Originally posted by: Lord_Voldemort

Both are way better actresses than Deepika but they are ordinary looking compared to Deepika who is stunning.

Even if their script choices were correct, they could never have become a Deepika. At max they could have become a Taapsee or a Kangana, but never a Deepika.

Originally posted by: Harley_Quinn

They both didn't look like quintessential Bollywood heroine, and that's where they failed. Because even when the so called feminists expect all actresses to like like angels dropped from heaven with perfect hourglass figure, then what could you expect from the general audience.

Otherwise Pari was a better actress than Deepika, and Sonakshi too was a good actress along with being a very good dancer.

Just see how effortlessly she matches steps with Prabhudeva and Shahid Go Go Govinda and Saree Ke Fall Sa.

But she didn't used her skills properly, or maybe she didn't get a chance. Because in Bollywood, even when you are a star kid, actresses don't get projects for the purpose of showcasing their talent (Excluding Karan Johar kids).

Originally posted by: JackSparrowcraz

Do all female stars look like quintessential Bollywood heroine?

No they don't.

Originally posted by: Harley_Quinn

No they don't.

Originally posted by: JackSparrowcraz

implies Deepika is there due to looks than acting.hmm,

She was first hired due to her looks, undoubtedly. But she learnt and improved over the years. Her acting in Piku and Cocktail is proof of that.