She’s guilty as sin
Bigg Boss 19-Daily Discussion Thread- 30th September, 2025
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 30, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
101 ways to patau your pati
Trump's 100% tariff on Bollywood films
Bhagwan Ke Charnon Mein Swarg
Aishwarya Rai at the Paris fashion week
✦ Font-astic Voyage Contest Voting Round 1 | Invites ONLY ✦
What's next? (Multiple votes allowed)
The Pilot Pirates | Book Talk Reading Challenge 2025
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Oct 1, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Budget Single Digit : 7 cameo openings.
DADI AS BOOTH 1.10
Which faces u r fed up of watching
My Box Office Prediction for Sunny Ki....jo bhi hai.
Swara Bhaskar..someone who dared to say it out loud #respect
True Face of BIAS & NEPOTISM!
👻 The Manuscript Marauders 👻 BookTalk Reading Challenge October 2025
She’s guilty as sin
Well the time line is pretty significant here.
1) Sushant started going downhill after he started associating with Rea. Sushant was sleeping a lot, Rea and her family were living at his place, had a lot of parties and Sushant would be sleeping through them. At least the above facts are stated by his previous driver and I don't see a reason as to why he would lie. That interview is admissible in court.
2) Also Rea and her brother were appointed as directors in his companies. This has also been verified.
All other rumors and facts don't have any credible sources.
3) Now is there evidence to suggest Rea tried to mess around with his prescription meds for reasons such as weaken his mental stability in order to make him more susceptible to her demands, incapacitate him physically ect.? I don't know. It's hard to prove these points unless there are iron clad evidence such as eye witness accounts, toxicology report post mortem or she, herself acknowledges it. Could the drugs have adversely affected his mental stability even though that might not have been the prime motive of Rea? She might have wanted him to be more susceptible. Not Suicidal. Again we don't know.
If there are ways to prove Point 3) then points 1) and 2) can be pretty incriminating against her at a jury.
Originally posted by: Maroonporsche
She’s guilty as sin
She's guilty in the public court for sure. In a court lot more evidence would be needed than what is presented till now.
She's guilty in the public court for sure. In a court lot more evidence would be needed than what is presented till now.
Hard to find the evidence
Finding Rhea itself is tough task 😆
Well lets hope she has the find the iPhone app installed on her phone.
Well the time line is pretty significant here.
1) Sushant started going downhill after he started associating with Rea. Sushant was sleeping a lot, Rea and her family were living at his place, had a lot of parties and Sushant would be sleeping through them. At least the above facts are stated by his previous driver and I don't see a reason as to why he would lie. That interview is admissible in court.
2) Also Rea and her brother were appointed as directors in his companies. This has also been verified.
All other rumors and facts don't have any credible sources.
3) Now is there evidence to suggest Rea tried to mess around with his prescription meds for reasons such as weaken his mental stability in order to make him more susceptible to her demands, incapacitate him physically ect.? I don't know. It's hard to prove these points unless there are iron clad evidence such as eye witness accounts, toxicology report post mortem or she, herself acknowledges it. Could the drugs have adversely affected his mental stability even though that might not have been the prime motive of Rea? She might have wanted him to be more susceptible. Not Suicidal. Again we don't know.
If there are ways to prove Point 3) then points 1) and 2) can be pretty incriminating against her at a jury.
I haven't seen driver interview but arguments in court are lot more nuanced. Leading questions ie questions leading to a certain answer which the questioner wants to hear are restricted in testimonies because the way a question is asked can majorly influence the answers. Cross-examination of witnesses may provide a fuller picture. Witnesses don't lie generally under oath but influencing witnesses to say what can build a certain narrative is how a case is made.
Becoming a director of a newly formed company doesn't prove much. Forgery, fraud can probably be proven most easily if they can prove money was put in Rheas account. Abetment to suicide is a hard thing to prove even then since Sushant wouldn't commit suicide for 15 crores.
She could be guilty of many things or she could be stuck in wrong place wrong time.
She is definitely guilty ...
Coz the day Sushant died everyone started mourning but
Rhea and her Budhao( Bhatt) started realising articles abt psycho horror story 🤬
Now when his family ,Ankita,Mahesh , his body guard etc saying abt Rhea and her family now m damn sure she is damn evil ... Need to send jail ...his family should get justice .
I was also struck to that point but her actions are speaking for themselves. So can't help but see her in negative light
Well the time line is pretty significant here.
1) Sushant started going downhill after he started associating with Rea. Sushant was sleeping a lot, Rea and her family were living at his place, had a lot of parties and Sushant would be sleeping through them. At least the above facts are stated by his previous driver and I don't see a reason as to why he would lie. That interview is admissible in court.
2) Also Rea and her brother were appointed as directors in his companies. This has also been verified.
All other rumors and facts don't have any credible sources.
3) Now is there evidence to suggest Rea tried to mess around with his prescription meds for reasons such as weaken his mental stability in order to make him more susceptible to her demands, incapacitate him physically ect.? I don't know. It's hard to prove these points unless there are iron clad evidence such as eye witness accounts, toxicology report post mortem or she, herself acknowledges it. Could the drugs have adversely affected his mental stability even though that might not have been the prime motive of Rea? She might have wanted him to be more susceptible. Not Suicidal. Again we don't know.
If there are ways to prove Point 3) then points 1) and 2) can be pretty incriminating against her at a jury.
The attorney said if she messed with his mental state in anyway and that is what lead him to suicide than she is responsible for the murder. It was like you get someone drunk and they run into a car walking you are responsible. It is not even abetment to suicide. But only the FIR states than and the string operation done on his trainer helps.
Originally posted by: kantalaga_
She is definitely guilty ...
Coz the day Sushant died everyone started mourning but
Rhea and her Budhao( Bhatt) started realising articles abt psycho horror story 🤬
Now when his family ,Ankita,Mahesh , his body guard etc saying abt Rhea and her family now m damn sure she is damn evil ... Need to send jail ...his family should get justice .
I also have huge doubt that she wasn't alone. I strongly feel the Bhatts or someone more powerful were involved. She dates Aditya and others they never reported being in depression or taking weird medication. Was she sent do mess with him?
...
...
Disha Salian case: FIR filed against Aaditya Thackeray, Rhea Chakraborty, Dino Morea, Suraj Pancholi and others Disha Salian case: FIR filed...
...
...
1