Anatomy of hate - Page 3

Nice way of red-herring the actual, very relevant and important issue by labeling it as "hatred." You're also putting words in people's mouth by basing your entire "anatomy" on the false claim that people want KJo to blow his bank account on strangers.

How hard is it to understand that it's not "hatred" towards her on an individual level but rather towards idea of anyone who is that unsavory and sub par being propped up everywhere like she's the meryl streep of india? She's emblematic of all the things wrong with bollywood and that's not going away any time soon.

Originally posted by: anjs

if you are asking this question, then you dont know what the issue is........ Nobody expects KJO or anyone to not cast their choice of actors in their own movies.......

Nobody? The majority of the people have been on a rampage demanding that KJo hire outsiders and do auditions. Nobody has any right to his money and how he decides to spend it.

Originally posted by: anjs

its when nepo kids gets 4-5 movies even before their debut movie is out.....

How does the number of movies matter when you yourself said people can spend their money however they want? If they want to invest on her, it's their choice.

Originally posted by: anjs

its when you spread dirty fake blinds against someone, just cause you dont want that person to do well, esp if he is an outsider and you feel he doesnt belong in bollywood while your nepo's are entitled to be there.....

Blind are disgusting but almost everyone uses them and spreads them, not just KJo. We also don't have any proof that it was specifically KJo that spread anything against Sushant. What does he have to gain from it? For god's sake, he gave him a Dharma movie. And please don't make conspiracy theories that he deliberately spent crores to give Sushant a bad movie and destroy him.

Originally posted by: anjs

its when you keep hammering fake praising articles about your favorites even if its fake .........to mislead the audience into believing that your favorite is audience's favorite as well.........

Fake praise articles are a dime a dozen. Everyone's PR spreads them to keep them in the news and hype them up. I've seen thousands of fake praise articles about Ranveer and Deepika. Ranveer's PR even puts down bigger stars than him to elevate him.

Sushant failed in not having a loud desperate PR like other stars in his generation. That's his own issue. Why didn't he hire someone who will push him hard?

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

Bold- hello come yaar borrowed money has to be returned. Its like saying people get loan freely. Of course its his money. Even if he is borrowing some thing he has to return with interest. Who is going pay to the financiers? You and me? The people writing hate messages on his on wall are going to pay back the money. Of course not. If you and me are financing it or getting in the financers then we can ask KJO or we demand KJO to cast some one we want But we aren't. Profit or loss isn't ours. Its KJO's .Pofit is his loses are his. Loss of money and reputation. If he casts an outsider and movie flops its his borrowed money that goes down in drain. He still has to pay back despite the loses. So really don't understand what is the argument here. He is not making movie from our taxes that we can demand anything . Profit is his and loss is his so he can invest in whomever he wants. If the movie flops and Dharma production faces loses the so called audience will still go on its merry way without a care its KJo's business that will get affected not ours so it has to be his choice. Dhrma production was in complete debt and loses when KJo's father was running it. Its KJO who got it out of loses made it a profitable brand. Adi chopra got a legacy from Yash chopra but KJO didn't . He got a failed company from his father turned into a brand equal to Yash Raj so definitely he has a great business acumen. How can we dictate how a private individual uses his business acumen? As long its Dharma production no one can demand anything accept KJO because its his private business not a government company.

That's the point mere dost.

Your post makes the point that uski marzi, its his hard-earned money.

Only, its NOT!

The money is owned by financiers, and more importantly the public. Making a movie requires not just money, but the investment of emotions from you, me & all the aam jantaa. So, unlike, meri marzi main apne paison ko aag lagau; nope, you are accountable, not just to your financiers but to the public as well.

So, if a director says he/she thinks a certain actor fits a role, let him/her be - till the time that actor fits your budget. Don't play games to snatch projects from outsiders, and don't malign their reputation.

Good brilliant move by making a post on questioning the authenticity of the kjo's trolls..u know what, u dont seem to be as ignorant as u sound! I think u had come here to white wash him and justify his doings...whoever ur ,take it from me..HE WAS WRONG AND HE IS WRONG AND HE WILL CONTINUE TO BE THE WRONG ONE! HE IS NOISY, NOSY AND ARROGANT WHO BITCHES ABOUT OTHERS! LIKE KAREENA ,RANBIR AND SO..

We have seen this with our own eyes through his chat shows and his interviews..so please dont discuss like an ignorant one!

Originally posted by: coldbrew

Nice way of red-herring the actual, very relevant and important issue by labeling it as "hatred." You're also putting words in people's mouth by basing your entire "anatomy" on the false claim that people want KJo to blow his bank account on strangers.

How hard is it to understand that it's not "hatred" towards her on an individual level but rather towards idea of anyone who is that unsavory and sub par being propped up everywhere like she's the meryl streep of india? She's emblematic of all the things wrong with bollywood and that's not going away any time soon.

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

No the story is he became a financier or Co producer when the director or other producer gave in on the Alia request. So even those ten maybe some wouldn’t be Dharma films without Alia.

But again it’s Bollywood for 107 years

Okay that is unethical but why don’t those directors didn’t say screw you , I ll find another producer if you force me to pick Alia over my choice of a actress? Why would they even try to approach KJo when they know KJo will recommend Aloo?

Is all the money really from BW entities or there is mafia investment... and maybe that why it’s all driven to push kids to stardom that is their choice or someone who will stay within their societal norms and secrets...

Originally posted by: slumgod..

Okay that is unethical but why don’t those directors didn’t say screw you , I ll find another producer if you force me to pick Alia over my choice of a actress? Why would they even try to approach KJo when they know KJo will recommend Aloo?

They go to KJo because they want the financing he can give or get them. In that case, KJo definitely has a right to push his own favorite into the product. There is nothing wrong with it. That's how business works.

There are always going to be people who have things stacked in their favor like Alia does. People just have to live in that world and make the best of it. Outsiders like Kriti, Tapsee and Kangana have still made it in spite of Alia having it easy.

It's a tough but small industry. There are only 10 or 15 mainstream lead actresses. Out of that, at least half are from the outside. People aren't going to be able to dump a 100 more into that circle no matter how much they cry about it.

Originally posted by: tapori

That's the point mere dost.

Your post makes the point that uski marzi, its his hard-earned money.

Only, its NOT!

The money is owned by financiers, and more importantly the public. Making a movie requires not just money, but the investment of emotions from you, me & all the aam jantaa. So, unlike, meri marzi main apne paison ko aag lagau; nope, you are accountable, not just to your financiers but to the public as well.

So, if a director says he/she thinks a certain actor fits a role, let him/her be - till the time that actor fits your budget. Don't play games to snatch projects from outsiders, and don't malign their reputation.

Now don't get on with investment of emotions etc we are here solely talking about money. Money is not ours money its Dhrama production so whether they borrow or do anything its their loss or profit. Its how private enterprises are run. Yes he is accountable to his financiers and audience is not the financer . He has to return the money despite whatever the result so how can we who have not spent a single penny on decide anything. Until unles we decide to reimburse Dharma for their loses we don't have a say.

Originally posted by: coldbrew

Nice way of red-herring the actual, very relevant and important issue by labeling it as "hatred." You're also putting words in people's mouth by basing your entire "anatomy" on the false claim that people want KJo to blow his bank account on strangers.

How hard is it to understand that it's not "hatred" towards her on an individual level but rather towards idea of anyone who is that unsavory and sub par being propped up everywhere like she's the meryl streep of india? She's emblematic of all the things wrong with bollywood and that's not going away any time soon.