Hrithik to play Lord Krishna in Deepika's Draupadi? - Page 4

Isn't it based on palace of illusions , then he should play karna , so they can be the love couple and shippers can sail the ship

Shouldn’t they get a director first?

Originally posted by: S_H_Y

Isn't it based on palace of illusions , then he should play karna , so they can be the love couple and shippers can sail the ship

PoI rights were bought by someone else.

Still, YUCK! A wannabe assaulter with the woman he tried to have assaulted. The author and shippers of this pair both have to have sick minds!

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Drapaudi is part of Mahabharata is she not?? A most important prominent of the epic

I get its about her life her pov but still casting of other characters has to be write for it to work. Krishna was important part of her life they shared a very close relationship you can't just take any random actor and ruin Krishna s essence

As i said i can't explain you need to read epic yourself to understand what i mean

All i am saying is that deepika does not need to pull dirty tricks to take the centre stage draupaudi the character is an enigma an insiparation in itself all she needs to do is pay attention to her acting skills

Yeah, thanks I've read Mahabharata.

And what dirty tricks? You sound like some random hater. This is the story of Draupadi. People around her character are important, but she is the most important.

Originally posted by: HappyPlace

Yeah, thanks I've read Mahabharata.

And what dirty tricks? You sound like some random hater. This is the story of Draupadi. People around her character are important, but she is the most important.

Hater ?? Seriously whose hater by the way please tell me the original post that i quote said something on lines deepika interfering in the casting to hog the limelight my reply was in that regard that drapaudi the character is an enigma in herself and deepika does not need to pull any of her dirty trick to get the centre stage the character provides enough material for that

You should first understand what the conversation is about properly and then reply instead of jumping in between without knowing head or tail of matter

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

There is no such thing as "original" ved vyas version of Mahabharata. Nobody has read ved vyas s original version because that does not exist

For more information you can refer this thread

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/karnsangini/5038742/mahabharat-the-epic-sources-variations-discuss-here-only

I have read critical edition of Mahabharata other than this you can read km ganguly of Mahabharata which are usually considered for reference

Gee thanks. I had wondered for some time in what form the scriptures have been preserved. Thank you for the link.

Originally posted by: MahanalayakKarn

Butting in. Sorry.

No Ved Vyas Mahabharata is available. Of the 4 versions supposedly narrated by Vyasa to his 4 students. Only Vaishampayana version and part of Jaimini version are available.

The problem is these versions were written down centuries after they were orally narrated, so there is bound to be corruption in the stories.

The purest forms are supposed to be the Kashmiri and Nepali versions. BORI took 1600 plus versions available and put it all together, excluding stuff they considered interpolations. This is the critical edition.

The Sanskrit version of CE is available free online. The English translation by Bibek Debroy is available to buy.

That being said, the southern versions were not taken into consideration. There was one gentleman who did a critical edition of the southern recension. But that was ONE person. I hear BORI is doing CE of SR as well.

Not to mention the Southeast Asian versions. Then, there is Razm Nama, the version compiled by Akbar.

The earliest WRITTEN form available is the Spitzer Manuscript which was discovered in China. THAT, interestingly, seems to have a different arrangement acc to reports.

Wow thanks a bunch. I asked because people usually read the Debroy version and I am not sure how correct that is.

I always imagined that the real scriptures, without any corruption may be found somewhere in Thailand perhaps. After all they have their own version of Ram Lila too (here I'm not specifically referring to MB) and they were never colonized I think.

Thank you so much. P.s. I ❤️ you!

Originally posted by: nigahen

Wow thanks a bunch. I asked because people usually read the Debroy version and I am not sure how correct that is.

I always imagined that the real scriptures, without any corruption may be found somewhere in Thailand perhaps. After all they have their own version of Ram Lila too (here I'm not specifically referring to MB) and they were never colonized I think.

Thank you so much. P.s. I ❤️ you!

The CE itself (the Sanskrit form) used extensive research to exclude or include incidents. For ex, Panchali's famous rejection of Karna was taken out because it was present in only 4 out of 1600 plus northern versions. The southern versions actually say Krishna pulled a dirty trick to make Karna fail (made sure Karna got damaged bowstrings, basically). The versions considered most uncorrupt did not have the rejection, either. So 0.025% of NORTHERN versions had it and none of the purer versions and none of the non-north Indian versions. Therefore, it was excluded.

So while CE is not perfect, it is the best we have available now.

Debroy translation of said CE has definite problems. This is something expected when one person does the work.

@Red Southeast Asian versions may well be purer than Indian forms. BORI's determination that Kashmiri/Nepali versions are purer was only for northern Indian recension. I think one of the Indonesian versions says Panchali was only married to Yudhishtira. A Nepali version gives an alternate ending to Mahabharata. Basically, after the war, Panchali simply walks out on the Pandavas. Bheema blocks anyone from following. The version says she went on a "pilgrimage of fire" which I take to mean she returned to her biological father's house. Arjuna went somewhere north. I forgot what happened to the rest.

Even within Indian versions, Bhagavatham says Krishna simply disappeared, and it looks like Arjuna helped him disappear. The Pandavas scatter after Krishna's disappearance, and Panchali dies in the palace.

Originally posted by: MahanalayakKarn

The CE itself (the Sanskrit form) used extensive research to exclude or include incidents. For ex, Panchali's famous rejection of Karna was taken out because it was present in only 4 out of 1600 plus northern versions. The southern versions actually say Krishna pulled a dirty trick to make Karna fail (made sure Karna got damaged bowstrings, basically). The versions considered most uncorrupt did not have the rejection, either. So 0.025% of NORTHERN versions had it and none of the purer versions and none of the non-north Indian versions. Therefore, it was excluded.

So while CE is not perfect, it is the best we have available now.

Debroy translation of said CE has definite problems. This is something expected when one person does the work.

@Red Southeast Asian versions may well be purer than Indian forms. BORI's determination that Kashmiri/Nepali versions are purer was only for northern Indian recension. I think one of the Indonesian versions says Panchali was only married to Yudhishtira. A Nepali version gives an alternate ending to Mahabharata. Basically, after the war, Panchali simply walks out on the Pandavas. Bheema blocks anyone from following. The version says she went on a "pilgrimage of fire" which I take to mean she returned to her biological father's house. Arjuna went somewhere north. I forgot what happened to the rest.

Even within Indian versions, Bhagavatham says Krishna simply disappeared, and it looks like Arjuna helped him disappear. The Pandavas scatter after Krishna's disappearance, and Panchali dies in the palace.

I am so pleased...you are so knowledgeable!....And thank you for taking the time to reply to me..

But what about South Indian versions. Why are they mostly considering north Indian versions?

So Panchali was only married to Yudhishthir in an Indonesian version? I have read that it's allegorical...like Draupadi respresnts the fire of kundalini and the Pandavas the lower five chakras...could be....wish we could know the real version..

Its hard to imagine HR as the Lord Krishna....May be one of Shahid/RS/RK or even Ayushmann should do it....