Would Manikarnika collected more had Kangu not interfered with movie

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

1146481

Suspended

Posted: 6 years ago

#11

It would have collected more had Kangana NOT been a part of the film. She is too repulsive and criminal to play such a role.

Deepika, Kareena, Priyanka would have turned the subject into a Blockbuster.

Edited by ThunderLight - 6 years ago

Quote

liberiangirl

@liberiangirl

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 6 years ago

#12

Manikarnika would've had made more and would've been successful if Kangu wouldn't have been part of the movie.

Krish should've chosen someone else in her place for such an iconic character.

While Kangana may have her set of fans and neutrals who will watch her movie, there are also people like me who find her so repulsive and disgusting to even think of watching the movie for free on internet. That's the kind of emotion this woman invokes in me.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Jayashree

@jayashree.g

Beginner

Posted: 6 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: ThunderLight
It would have collected more had Kangana NOT been a part of the film. She is too repulsive and criminal to play such a role.

Deepika, Kareena, Priyanka would have turned the subject into a Blockbuster.

True. Except that im not sure about kareena carrying the role of a warrior queen. Anushka shetty would also have been a good choice apart from DP and PC

Quote

liberiangirl

@liberiangirl

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 6 years ago

#14

PC would've been a better choice. I don't think I personally would find Kareena or DP convincing in this role. But PC would've knocked it out of the park.

Quote

desicrowd

@desicrowd

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 6 years ago

#15

Definitely, if Kangy was not involved at all and another popular actress maybe it would have done better and received more support... but irrespective of that Kangy is a good actress but her habit of Ungli and creating controversies and being vile has affected the movie... this movie would have got good response from within the industry too had she been good and humble.

Irrespective of how the movie is today, I would have personally expected a better tribute to Rani Laxmi Bai...

Quote

PD_forums

@PD_forums

Stunner

+ 7

Posted: 6 years ago

#16

Based on Krish record I will say no.

Quote

Priya

@priya185

Master

+ 39

Comedy Crew

Posted: 6 years ago

#17

Yes she doesn't need to in the director's seat her acting itself is superb
I feel there was a lot of negativity surrounding this film especially from Kangana herself

Quote

v_nakshara

@v_nakshara

Explorer

+ 2

Posted: 6 years ago

#18

It would have done better had Kangana not been part of it. Her repulsive and disgusting personality is such a turnoff. I won't even watch the movie online.

I don't watch Kangana's movies anymore as I don't support a stalker.

Quote

anjs

@anjs

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 6 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: fivestars
Absolutely!!

I as an audience wanted to watch this movie but seeing her psycotic statements on daily basis and how she backstabbed krish made me avoid this movie !

Same here... Avoided cause of kangna

Edited by krystel21 - 6 years ago

Quote

anjs

@anjs

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 6 years ago

#20

Originally posted by: jayashree.g

True. Except that im not sure about kareena carrying the role of a warrior queen. Anushka shetty would also have been a good choice apart from DP and PC

I agree... DP cause m her fan and slightly biased, but definitely Pc and Anushka would've looked excellent..